Porter Anna K, Evenson Kelly R, Griffin G P
Ramboll, Raleigh, North Carolina, US.
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US.
Findings (Syd). 2022;2022. doi: 10.32866/001c.57773. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
This study evaluates concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and usability of the Strava smartphone app for measuring bicycling locations in urban and rural field tests. Strava location data were inside an 11-meter buffer on average 64% of the time compared to Qstarz' 52%, over 100 evaluations (n participants=73). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that the Strava app was useful (83%) and that they would prefer to use a smartphone app to track their bicycling (42%). Results indicate that the Strava app is reliable and valid for measuring bicycling locations in these field tests.
本研究评估了Strava智能手机应用程序在城市和农村实地测试中测量骑行位置的同时效度、重测信度和可用性。在超过100次评估(n参与者 = 73)中,与Qstarz的52%相比,Strava位置数据平均有64%的时间位于11米缓冲区内。大多数参与者同意或强烈同意Strava应用程序很有用(83%),并且他们更愿意使用智能手机应用程序来跟踪自己的骑行情况(42%)。结果表明,在这些实地测试中,Strava应用程序在测量骑行位置方面是可靠且有效的。