Enoch Jamie, Ghulakhszian Arevik, Sekhon Mandeep, Crabb David P, Taylor Deanna J, Dinah Christiana
Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Ophthalmology Department, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Feb 1;17:299-310. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S386662. eCollection 2023.
Geographic atrophy (GA) is the advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of age-related macular degeneration. Presently, GA cannot be treated. However, new therapies administered by intravitreal injection are in late-stage development. These can slow down, but do not stop or reverse, GA progression. The acceptability of these emerging therapies to people with GA is currently unknown. The present case study explores the perspectives of a person living with GA who took part in the terminated Phase 3 clinical trial of Lampalizumab, a candidate intravitreal treatment for GA. We explored this patient's perspective on the retrospective acceptability of regular Lampalizumab injections, and the prospective acceptability of future intravitreal therapies for GA.
A 78-year-old woman living in the UK was recruited as part of a mixed-methods pilot study and interviewed by telephone, regarding: her experience of the Lampalizumab trial injections; and her thoughts regarding emerging intravitreal therapies for GA. The Framework Method was used for initial inductive analysis of the interview transcript. Subsequently, deductive analysis was undertaken, informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA).
For this participant, intravitreal injections in the Lampalizumab trial were acceptable, although streamlining processes within the clinic would have improved the patient experience. Regarding prospective acceptability of new intravitreal therapies, the participant considered a delay in progression of GA a valuable goal. Potential discomfort, anxiety and inconvenience associated with regular intravitreal injections would be acceptable in the context of preserving her vision for as long as possible.
Analysis of one participant's experience demonstrates the value of exploring GA patients' unique views on the acceptability of new intravitreal treatments. Larger prospective studies will provide more insight that help to optimise treatment design and delivery, thereby maximising likelihood of adherence and persistence when these therapies eventually arrive in clinic.
地图样萎缩(GA)是年龄相关性黄斑变性非新生血管(干性)型的晚期形式。目前,GA无法治疗。然而,通过玻璃体内注射给药的新疗法正处于后期研发阶段。这些疗法可以减缓但不能阻止或逆转GA的进展。目前尚不清楚这些新兴疗法对GA患者的可接受性。本案例研究探讨了一名GA患者的观点,该患者参与了终止的玻璃体内注射药物兰帕珠单抗治疗GA的3期临床试验。我们探讨了该患者对定期注射兰帕珠单抗回顾性可接受性的看法,以及对未来GA玻璃体内治疗前瞻性可接受性的看法。
一名居住在英国的78岁女性被招募入一项混合方法试点研究,并通过电话进行访谈,内容包括:她接受兰帕珠单抗试验注射的经历;以及她对新兴的GA玻璃体内治疗的想法。采用框架法对访谈记录进行初步归纳分析。随后,在可接受性理论框架(TFA)的指导下进行演绎分析。
对于该参与者来说,兰帕珠单抗试验中的玻璃体内注射是可以接受的,尽管简化诊所流程会改善患者体验。关于新的玻璃体内治疗的前瞻性可接受性,参与者认为延缓GA进展是一个有价值的目标。在尽可能长时间保留视力的情况下,与定期玻璃体内注射相关的潜在不适、焦虑和不便将是可以接受的。
对一名参与者经历的分析表明,探索GA患者对新的玻璃体内治疗可接受性的独特观点具有重要意义。更大规模的前瞻性研究将提供更多见解,有助于优化治疗设计和实施,从而在这些疗法最终应用于临床时最大限度地提高依从性和持续性。