Joko Takeshi, Nagai Yoshimi, Mori Ryusaburo, Tanaka Koji, Oshima Yuji, Hikichi Yusuke, Komori Tetsushi, Carrasco Joao, Maculaitis Martine C, Will Oliver, Beusterien Kathleen, Takahashi Kanji
Department of Ophthalmology, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 12;14:553-567. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S228890. eCollection 2020.
In Japan, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) dosing regimens for wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) include pro re nata, every 2 months, and treat-and-extend, resulting in different outcomes and patient burden. Although reflecting patient preferences in treatment decision-making is desirable, few studies have examined this in Japan. This study assessed the patients willingness to trade-off between different dosing regimens.
Patients with wAMD were recruited from four Japanese university hospitals to complete a face-to-face cross-sectional survey. In a discrete choice experiment, patients were asked to choose their preferred option from two anti-VEGF treatment profiles shown side-by-side across a series of choice tasks. The profiles varied on four attributes: number of injections in 12 months, number of physician consultations in 12 months, chance of 1-year visual acuity (VA) improvement, and chance of 2-year VA maintenance. Preference weights were estimated using hierarchical Bayes' models.
Overall, 120 patients (30 treatment naïve and 90 anti-VEGF experienced) completed the survey. Patients were willing to accept an increase from three to approximately eight injections in 12 months to increase the chance of 1-year VA improvement from 25% to 40%. They would be willing to accept 11 injections in 12 months if the chance of 2-year VA maintenance increased from 80% to 96%. The most valued attributes were increasing the chance of 2-year VA maintenance and reducing the number of injections in 12 months, which were each about twice as important as decreasing physician consultations in 12 months and increasing the chance of 1-year VA improvement (<0.001). Among the dosing regimens, patients most preferred treat-and-extend because of its higher chance of 2-year VA maintenance.
Informing patients with wAMD about the likelihood of long-term VA maintenance when selecting treatment may increase the acceptance of an optimal treatment regimen and number of injections.
在日本,湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(wAMD)的玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)给药方案包括按需给药、每2个月给药一次以及治疗并延长方案,这些方案会导致不同的治疗结果和患者负担。尽管在治疗决策中考虑患者偏好是可取的,但在日本很少有研究对此进行探讨。本研究评估了患者在不同给药方案之间进行权衡的意愿。
从四家日本大学医院招募wAMD患者,以完成一项面对面的横断面调查。在一项离散选择实验中,要求患者在一系列选择任务中从并排展示的两种抗VEGF治疗方案中选择他们偏好的选项。这些方案在四个属性上有所不同:12个月内的注射次数、12个月内的医生问诊次数、1年视力(VA)改善的可能性以及2年VA维持的可能性。使用分层贝叶斯模型估计偏好权重。
总体而言,120名患者(30名初治患者和90名接受过抗VEGF治疗的患者)完成了调查。患者愿意接受12个月内注射次数从3次增加到约8次,以使1年VA改善的可能性从25%提高到40%。如果2年VA维持的可能性从80%提高到96%,他们愿意接受12个月内注射11次。最受重视的属性是提高2年VA维持的可能性和减少12个月内的注射次数,这两个属性的重要性约为减少12个月内医生问诊次数和提高1年VA改善可能性的两倍(<0.001)。在给药方案中,患者最喜欢治疗并延长方案,因为其2年VA维持的可能性更高。
在为wAMD患者选择治疗方案时告知其长期VA维持的可能性,可能会提高对最佳治疗方案和注射次数的接受度。