Suppr超能文献

在退伍军人事务部急诊科实施阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物及纳洛酮分发的障碍与促进因素

Barriers and facilitators to implementing medications for opioid use disorder and naloxone distribution in Veterans Affairs emergency departments.

作者信息

Sasson Comilla, Dieujuste Nathalie, Klocko Robert, Basrai Zahir, Celedon Manuel, Hsiao Jonie, Himstreet Julianne, Hoffman Jonathan, Pfaff Cassidy, Malmstrom Robert, Smith Jason, Holstein Ariel, Johnson-Koenke Rachel

机构信息

VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):289-298. doi: 10.1111/acem.14683. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Safer opioid prescribing patterns, naloxone distribution, and medications for opioid use disorder (M-OUD) are an important part of decreasing opioid-related adverse events. Veterans are more likely to experience these adverse events compared to the general population. Despite treatment guidelines and ED-based opioid safety programs implemented throughout Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers, many Veterans with OUD do not receive these harm reduction interventions. Prior research in other health care settings has identified barriers to M-OUD initiation and naloxone distribution; however, little is known about how this may be similar or different for health care professionals in VA ED and urgent care centers.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews with VA health care professionals and staff using a semistructured interview guide. We analyzed the data addressing barriers and facilitators to M-OUD treatment in the ED and naloxone distribution using descriptive matrix analysis, followed by team consensus.

RESULTS

We interviewed 19 VA staff in various roles. Respondent concerns and considerations regarding the initiation of M-OUD in the ED included M-OUD initiation falling outside of ED's scope of providing acute treatment, lack of VA-approved M-OUD protocols and follow-up procedures, staffing concerns, and educational gaps. Respondents reported that naloxone was important but lacked clarity on who should prescribe it. Some respondents stated that an automated system to prescribe naloxone would be helpful, and others felt that it would not offer needed support and education to patients. Some respondents reported that naloxone would not address opioid misuse, which other respondents felt was a belief due to stigma around substance use and lack of education about treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Our VA-based research highlights similarities of barriers and facilitators, seen in other health care settings, when implementing opioid safety initiatives. Education and training, destigmatizing substance use disorder care, and leveraging technology are important facilitators to increasing access to lifesaving therapies for OUD treatment and harm reduction.

摘要

目标

更安全的阿片类药物处方模式、纳洛酮分发以及阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物(M - OUD)是减少阿片类药物相关不良事件的重要组成部分。与普通人群相比,退伍军人更易发生这些不良事件。尽管退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心已实施了治疗指南和基于急诊科的阿片类药物安全项目,但许多患有阿片类药物使用障碍的退伍军人并未接受这些减少伤害的干预措施。此前在其他医疗环境中的研究已确定了启动M - OUD和分发纳洛酮的障碍;然而,对于VA急诊科和紧急护理中心的医疗保健专业人员而言,情况是否相似或不同却知之甚少。

方法

我们使用半结构化访谈指南对VA医疗保健专业人员和工作人员进行了定性访谈。我们使用描述性矩阵分析方法分析了有关急诊科M - OUD治疗和纳洛酮分发的障碍及促进因素的数据,随后达成团队共识。

结果

我们采访了19名担任不同角色的VA工作人员。受访者对在急诊科启动M - OUD的担忧和考虑因素包括:M - OUD启动超出了急诊科提供急性治疗的范围、缺乏VA批准的M - OUD方案和后续程序、人员配备问题以及教育差距。受访者表示纳洛酮很重要,但对于应由谁开具纳洛酮处方并不明确。一些受访者称,自动开具纳洛酮的系统会有所帮助,而另一些人则认为该系统无法为患者提供所需的支持和教育。一些受访者报告说纳洛酮无法解决阿片类药物滥用问题,而其他受访者认为这是由于物质使用方面的污名以及对治疗选择缺乏了解所致。

结论

我们基于VA的研究凸显了在实施阿片类药物安全举措时,其他医疗环境中所存在的障碍和促进因素的相似之处。教育与培训、消除物质使用障碍护理的污名化以及利用技术是增加获得用于阿片类药物使用障碍治疗和减少伤害的救生疗法机会的重要促进因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验