• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与术前目标关怀谈话发生相关的患者特征。

Patient Characteristics Associated With Occurrence of Preoperative Goals-of-Care Conversations.

机构信息

Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California.

Office of Research Patient Care Services, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55407.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55407
PMID:36757697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9912129/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Communication about patients' goals and planned and potential treatment is central to advance care planning. Undertaking or confirming advance care plans is also essential to preoperative preparation, particularly among patients who are frail or will undergo high-risk surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between patient risk of hospitalization or death and goals-of-care conversations documented with a completed Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decisions Initiative note among veterans undergoing surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 190 040 veterans who underwent operations between January 1, 2017, and February 28, 2020. Statistical analysis took place from November 1, 2021, to November 17, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Patient risk of hospitalization or death, evaluated with a Care Assessment Need (CAN) score (range, 0-99, with a higher score representing a greater risk of hospitalization or death), dichotomized as less than 80 or 80 or more.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Preoperative LST note completion (30 days before or on the day of surgery) or no LST note completion within the 30-day preoperative period prior to or on the day of the index operation.

RESULTS

Of 190 040 veterans (90.8% men; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [11.9] years), 3.8% completed an LST note before surgery, and 96.2% did not complete an LST note. In the groups with and without LST note completion before surgery, most were aged between 65 and 84 years (62.1% vs 56.7%), male (94.3% vs 90.7%), and White (82.2% vs 78.3%). Compared with patients who completed an LST note before surgery, patients who did not complete an LST note before surgery tended to be female (9.3% vs 5.7%), Black (19.2% vs 15.7%), married (50.2% vs 46.5%), and in better health (Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0, 25.9% vs 15.2%); to have a lower risk of hospitalization or death (CAN score <80, 98.3% vs 96.9%); or to undergo neurosurgical (9.8% vs 6.2%) or urologic surgical procedures (5.9% vs 2.0%). Over the 3-year interval, unadjusted rates of LST note completion before surgery increased from 0.1% to 9.6%. Covariate-adjusted estimates of LST note completion indicated that veterans at a relatively elevated risk of hospitalization or death (CAN score ≥80) had higher odds of completing an LST note before surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.53) compared with those with CAN scores less than 80. High-risk surgery was not associated with increased LST note completion before surgery (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.01). Veterans who underwent cardiothoracic surgery had the highest likelihood of LST note completion before surgery (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.24-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Despite increasing LST note implementation, a minority of veterans completed an LST note preoperatively. Although doing so was more common among veterans with an elevated risk compared with those at lower risk, improving proactive communication and documentation of goals, particularly among higher-risk veterans, is needed. Doing so may promote goal-concordant surgical care and outcomes.

摘要

重要性:与患者讨论目标以及计划中的和潜在的治疗方案是预先护理计划的核心。进行或确认预先护理计划对于术前准备也至关重要,尤其是在体弱或接受高危手术的患者中。

目的:评估患者住院或死亡风险与接受手术的退伍军人中记录在生命维持治疗(LST)决策倡议说明中的目标关怀对话之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,包括 190400 名于 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日期间接受手术的退伍军人。统计分析于 2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 17 日进行。

暴露:患者的住院或死亡风险,使用护理评估需求(CAN)评分(范围为 0-99,得分越高表示住院或死亡的风险越高)进行评估,分为小于 80 或 80 或更高。

主要结果和措施:术前 LST 说明的完成(手术前 30 天或手术当天)或在手术前 30 天内未完成 LST 说明。

结果:在 190400 名退伍军人中(90.8%为男性;平均[标准差]年龄 65.2[11.9]岁),3.8%的人在手术前完成了 LST 说明,96.2%的人没有完成 LST 说明。在有和没有术前完成 LST 说明的组中,大多数人的年龄在 65 至 84 岁之间(62.1%对 56.7%)、男性(94.3%对 90.7%)和白人(82.2%对 78.3%)。与术前完成 LST 说明的患者相比,术前未完成 LST 说明的患者更可能为女性(9.3%对 5.7%)、黑人(19.2%对 15.7%)、已婚(50.2%对 46.5%)和健康状况较好(Charlson 合并症指数评分为 0 的患者占 25.9%对 15.2%);住院或死亡风险较低(CAN 评分<80 的患者占 98.3%对 96.9%);或接受神经外科(9.8%对 6.2%)或泌尿科手术(5.9%对 2.0%)。在 3 年的时间间隔内,术前完成 LST 说明的未调整率从 0.1%增加到 9.6%。协变量调整后的 LST 说明完成估计表明,与 CAN 评分小于 80 的患者相比,住院或死亡风险相对较高(CAN 评分≥80)的退伍军人更有可能在术前完成 LST 说明(比值比[OR],1.29;95%置信区间[CI],1.09-1.53)。高危手术与术前 LST 说明的增加无关(OR,0.93;95%CI,0.86-1.01)。接受心胸外科手术的退伍军人最有可能在术前完成 LST 说明(OR,1.35;95%CI,1.24-1.47)。

结论和相关性:尽管 LST 说明的实施有所增加,但少数退伍军人在术前完成了 LST 说明。尽管与低风险患者相比,高风险患者更有可能这样做,但需要改善积极的沟通和目标的记录,特别是在高风险的退伍军人中。这样做可能会促进目标一致的手术护理和结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/04231487c0d5/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/1f170dcf5131/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/db03274e904c/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/04231487c0d5/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/1f170dcf5131/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/db03274e904c/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b7/9912129/04231487c0d5/jamanetwopen-e2255407-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Characteristics Associated With Occurrence of Preoperative Goals-of-Care Conversations.与术前目标关怀谈话发生相关的患者特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55407.
2
Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans. Veterans 术前照护目标记录中的差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48235.
3
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.维持生命治疗决策倡议:国家退伍军人事务部计划尊重退伍军人护理偏好的早期实施结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease.VA 生命维持治疗决策倡议:晚期肾病退伍军人的定性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2517-2529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17807. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Family members' experience improves with care preference documentation in home based primary care.家庭照护偏好记录可改善家庭初级保健中家庭成员的体验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3576-3583. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17410. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Life-sustaining treatment decisions and family evaluations of end-of-life care for Veteran decedents in Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes.维持生命治疗决策和退伍军人事务部疗养院已故退伍军人生命终期照护的家庭评估。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep;72(9):2709-2720. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19050. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
7
Pilot of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative Among Veterans With Serious Illness.严重疾病退伍军人生命维持治疗决策倡议的飞行员。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;38(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1049909120923595. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
Assessing concordance between patient preferences in advance care plans and in-hospital care.评估预先护理计划中的患者偏好与住院治疗之间的一致性。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):425-431. doi: 10.1071/AH18011.
9
Honoring Veterans' Preferences: The Association Between Comfort Care Goals and Care Received at the End of Life.尊重退伍军人的意愿:临终关怀目标与临终关怀接受程度之间的关联。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):743-754.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.039. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
10
Nephrology-Palliative Care Collaboration to Promote Outpatient Hemodialysis Goals of Care Conversations.肾脏病学与姑息治疗协作以促进门诊血液透析护理目标的沟通
Fed Pract. 2023 Oct;40(10):349-351a. doi: 10.12788/fp.0422. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review.终末期手术患者的姑息性预后工具:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1648-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Racial disparities in inpatient palliative care consultation among frail older patients undergoing high-risk elective surgical procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional study of the national inpatient sample.美国接受高风险择期外科手术的体弱老年患者住院姑息治疗咨询中的种族差异:一项基于全国住院患者样本的横断面研究
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jul 13;1(2):qxad026. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad026. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease.VA 生命维持治疗决策倡议:晚期肾病退伍军人的定性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2517-2529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17807. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Surgical Overtreatment and Shared Decision-making-The Limits of Choice.手术过度治疗与共同决策——选择的局限
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jan 1;157(1):5-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4425.
3
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans.
Veterans 术前照护目标记录中的差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48235.
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
4
Preoperative Conversations About Postoperative Risks, Outcomes, and Quality of Life-Time to Start Thinking Outside the Box.关于术后风险、结果和生活质量的术前谈话——是时候跳出框框思考了。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024048. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24048.
5
Patient Electronic Health Records Score for Preoperative Risk Assessment Before Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术前用于术前风险评估的患者电子健康记录评分
JB JS Open Access. 2020 May 6;5(2):e0061. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00061. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
6
Implementing Goals-of-Care Conversations: Lessons From High- and Low-Performing Sites From a VA National Initiative.实施目标关怀对话:一项退伍军人事务部全国倡议中高绩效和低绩效地点的经验教训。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Feb;61(2):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
7
Pilot of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative Among Veterans With Serious Illness.严重疾病退伍军人生命维持治疗决策倡议的飞行员。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;38(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1049909120923595. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).在2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情期间,重视预先医疗计划及关于不进行心肺复苏医嘱决策的重要性
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4894.
9
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.维持生命治疗决策倡议:国家退伍军人事务部计划尊重退伍军人护理偏好的早期实施结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes Following High-risk Surgery.高危手术后的姑息治疗和临终结局。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Feb 1;155(2):138-146. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5083.