Sommerlath K, Gillquist J
University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Linköping, Sweden.
Arthroscopy. 1987;3(3):166-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(87)80059-2.
Meniscus repair has been performed with a high success rate where the rupture occurs within the vascular zone. However, no study has compared the functional result of meniscus repair and total meniscectomy in similar patients with similar kinds of meniscus tear, with or without intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We studied 48 knees, 44 men and 4 women divided into matched pairs, some with, and some without torn anterior-cruciate ligaments. Follow-up was done 6-8 years after surgery. We concluded that meniscal repair has a high success rate in stable and unstable knees. At 7-year follow-up, meniscal repair showed no better functional result than meniscectomy. A meniscus repair technique which allows early range of motion training and muscle rehabilitation is, therefore, needed to improve functional end results.
在半月板撕裂发生于血管区时,半月板修复手术成功率较高。然而,尚无研究比较过在类似的半月板撕裂患者中,无论前交叉韧带(ACL)是否完整,半月板修复与全半月板切除术的功能效果。我们研究了48个膝关节,其中44名男性和4名女性,分为配对组,部分患者前交叉韧带撕裂,部分未撕裂。术后6至8年进行随访。我们得出结论,半月板修复在稳定和不稳定膝关节中成功率都很高。在7年随访时,半月板修复的功能效果并不比半月板切除术更好。因此,需要一种能允许早期进行活动度训练和肌肉康复的半月板修复技术,以改善功能最终结果。