• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prosocial behavior in students with intellectual disabilities: Individual level predictors and the role of the classroom peer context.智障学生的亲社会行为:个体水平的预测因素和课堂同伴环境的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281598. eCollection 2023.
2
Peer influence on problem behaviors among students with intellectual disabilities.同伴对智障学生问题行为的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Jul;114:103994. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103994. Epub 2021 May 18.
3
Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates' prosocial behavior.避免青少年的反社会行为:同学亲社会行为的积极影响。
J Adolesc. 2018 Oct;68:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
The Role of Classmates' Modeling and Reinforcement in Adolescents' Perceived Classroom Peer Context.同学榜样作用和强化在青少年感知的课堂同伴环境中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Feb;50(2):260-270. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01325-8. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
Challenging behaviour in students with intellectual disabilities: the role of individual and classmates' communication skills.智障学生的挑战性行为:个体和同学沟通技巧的作用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Apr;66(4):353-367. doi: 10.1111/jir.12922. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Student's and Classmates' Prosocial Behavior predict Academic Engagement in Middle School.学生和同学的亲社会行为预测中学生的学业投入。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Dec;53(12):2789-2800. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02027-1. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
8
Effect of prosocial behavior on school bullying victimization among children and adolescents: Peer and student-teacher relationships as mediators.亲社会行为对儿童和青少年校园欺凌受害情况的影响:以同伴关系和师生关系作为中介变量
J Adolesc. 2023 Feb;95(2):322-335. doi: 10.1002/jad.12116. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
9
How popularity goal and popularity status are related to observed and peer-nominated aggressive and prosocial behaviors in elementary school students.小学生的受欢迎度目标和受欢迎度状况如何与观察到的以及同伴提名的攻击性行为和亲社会行为相关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Mar;227:105590. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105590. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
10
Susceptibility to peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disability or Borderline Intellectual Functioning.青少年的亲社会行为易受同伴影响,患有轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能障碍的青少年也是如此。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jan;120:104143. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104143. Epub 2021 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between physical activity and emotional and behavioural problems in Chinese children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.中国智障儿童和青少年的身体活动与情绪及行为问题之间的关联。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 14;13:e18949. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18949. eCollection 2025.
2
Strengths and Difficulties among Adolescent with and without Specific Learning Disorders (SLD).患有和未患有特定学习障碍(SLD)的青少年的优势与困难
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 27;10(11):1741. doi: 10.3390/children10111741.

本文引用的文献

1
Susceptibility to peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disability or Borderline Intellectual Functioning.青少年的亲社会行为易受同伴影响,患有轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能障碍的青少年也是如此。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jan;120:104143. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104143. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
2
An Overview of Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports (12th ed.).《智力残疾概述:定义、诊断、分类及支持体系》(第12版)
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021 Nov 1;126(6):439-442. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-126.6.439.
3
Peer influence on problem behaviors among students with intellectual disabilities.同伴对智障学生问题行为的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Jul;114:103994. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103994. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Empathy, cognitive functioning, and prosocial behavior in mentored children.导师制儿童的同理心、认知功能与亲社会行为。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021 Sep;2021(179):41-57. doi: 10.1002/cad.20409. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Increased openness to external influences in adolescents with intellectual disability: Insights from an experimental study on social judgments.智障青少年对外界影响的开放性增加:一项关于社会判断的实验研究的启示。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Jun;113:103918. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103918. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
Information for researchers and professionals about the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires.面向研究人员和专业人士的关于优势与困难问卷的信息。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2007 May;12(2):98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00443_2.x.
7
With a Little Help from Their Peers: The Impact of Classmates on Adolescents' Development of Prosocial Behavior.同伴的一点帮助:同学对青少年亲社会行为发展的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Sep;49(9):1849-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Developmental trajectories of behaviour problems and prosocial behaviours of children with intellectual disabilities in a population-based cohort.基于人群的队列中智力残疾儿童行为问题和亲社会行为的发展轨迹。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;60(11):1210-1218. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13080. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Theory of mind development in school environment: A case of children with mild intellectual disability learning in inclusive and special education classrooms.学校环境中心理理论的发展:融合教育和特殊教育课堂中轻度智力障碍儿童学习的案例。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;32(5):1241-1254. doi: 10.1111/jar.12616. Epub 2019 May 8.
10
The Need to Contribute During Adolescence.青少年的参与需求。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):331-343. doi: 10.1177/1745691618805437. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

智障学生的亲社会行为:个体水平的预测因素和课堂同伴环境的作用。

Prosocial behavior in students with intellectual disabilities: Individual level predictors and the role of the classroom peer context.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Research Priority Area Yield, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281598. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0281598
PMID:36758049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9910739/
Abstract

Prosocial behavior at school, such as helping and sharing, contributes to positive individual development, peer relations, and classroom climate. Students with intellectual disabilities (ID) may have difficulty to demonstrate prosocial behavior, but little is known about the levels of prosocial behavior and its predictors in this population. This study aims to describe the prosocial behavior of students with ID attending special needs schools and related individual (i.e., age, sex, and general functioning) and classroom level (i.e., classmates' mean prosocial behavior) predictors. School staff members assessed prosocial behavior of 1022 students with ID (69.5% boys; Mage = 11.34 years, SD = 3.73, range: 4-19 years) at the beginning and the end of a schoolyear. We found that students with ID on average demonstrated moderate levels of prosocial behavior, this was lower compared to norms of typically developing students. Correlations within each timepoint proved that prosocial behavior was more present in older students, girls, and students with higher general functioning. Using a longitudinal multilevel model, we found that, prosocial behavior increased more over the schoolyear in older students and in students with higher general functioning. Classmates' mean levels of prosocial behavior did not affect later individual prosocial behavior. We conclude that prosocial behavior in students with ID depends on several individual characteristics, but less on the levels of prosocial behaviors in their special needs classroom peer context.

摘要

学校中的亲社会行为,如帮助和分享,有助于个体的积极发展、同伴关系和课堂氛围。智障学生可能难以表现出亲社会行为,但人们对这一人群的亲社会行为水平及其预测因素知之甚少。本研究旨在描述特殊需要学校智障学生的亲社会行为及其相关个体(即年龄、性别和一般功能)和课堂水平(即同学的平均亲社会行为)预测因素。学校工作人员在一学年的开始和结束时评估了 1022 名智障学生(69.5%为男生;平均年龄为 11.34 岁,标准差为 3.73,年龄范围为 4-19 岁)的亲社会行为。我们发现,智障学生的亲社会行为平均水平处于中等水平,与典型发展学生的水平相比较低。每个时间点的相关性证明,年龄较大的学生、女孩和一般功能较高的学生更具有亲社会行为。使用纵向多层模型,我们发现,随着学年的增加,年龄较大的学生和一般功能较高的学生的亲社会行为增长得更多。同学的平均亲社会行为水平不会影响后来的个体亲社会行为。我们的结论是,智障学生的亲社会行为取决于几个个体特征,但与其特殊需要课堂同伴环境中的亲社会行为水平关系不大。