Wen Hong, Jiang Yufeng, Deng Xueru, Nan Zhijiang, Liang Xinru, Diao Jingru
School of Environmental & Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, 730070, China; Key Laboratory of Yellow River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
School of Environmental & Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, 730070, China; Key Laboratory of Yellow River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 May 1;333:117468. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117468. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
The concern over antibiotic pollution from animal husbandry has significantly increased over recent years. However, few studies on output and environmental risk of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) throughout different exposure matrices from small-scale livestock farms (SSLFs) have been explored. This study explored the output and environmental risk of three classes of VAs (sulfonamides (SAs), tetracyclines (TCs), fluoroquinolones (FQs)) in three different types of environmental media (manure, soil, and plants/vegetables) derived from four livestock feedlots in the Hexi Corridor of Northwest China. Following, a risk assessment was conducted to identify the hazardous potential of these VAs on the ecological health of the surrounding environment. A total of 108 soil, 36 manure, 12 plants/vegetables, and 15 animal product samples were collected from the animal feedlots for analysis. The results showed that each of the three groups of VAs were detected in the soil, manure and plant samples derived from all four feedlots in varying levels. In the soil samples, the detection rate of SAs (68%) was higher than the TCs (57%) and the FQs (27%). The total concentration of VAs ranged from not detected (n.d.) to 275 ng/g, while chlortetracycline (CTC) was the most abundant (275 ng/g) of the VAs in soil samples. The SAs had the highest detection rate (100%), followed by TCs (89%), and FQs (78%) in manure samples. The total concentration of VAs residues ranged from n. d. to 105 ng/g, of which CTC was as high as 91 ng/g in manures. In the plant/vegetable samples, the TCs had the highest detection rate (58%), while sulfamethazine (SDM) was the most abundant (32 ng/g). The total concentration of the VAs ranged from n. d. to 65 ng/g in the plant/vegetable samples. The target VAs were not detected in animal products. Measurements of the composition of VAs in soil samples at different vertical depths as well as horizontal distances from the manure accumulation sites showed that VAs were partially retained in the soil of the feedlots and were distributed into the surrounding environment both horizontally and vertically. It is suspected that the detected VAs could be accumulated in agricultural soils since they could be found in most of the sampled manures and soils in SSLFs. These results highlighted the necessity of considering SSLF practices to mange the accumulation and disposal of manure mitigating and controlling VA pollution.
近年来,人们对畜牧业抗生素污染的关注度显著提高。然而,针对小规模养殖场(SSLFs)不同暴露基质中兽用抗生素(VAs)的产量和环境风险的研究却很少。本研究探究了中国西北河西走廊四个牲畜饲养场的三种环境介质(粪便、土壤和植物/蔬菜)中三类VAs(磺胺类(SAs)、四环素类(TCs)、氟喹诺酮类(FQs))的产量和环境风险。随后,进行了风险评估,以确定这些VAs对周围环境生态健康的潜在危害。从牲畜饲养场共采集了108份土壤、36份粪便、12份植物/蔬菜和15份动物产品样本进行分析。结果表明,在来自所有四个饲养场的土壤、粪便和植物样本中均检测到了这三类VAs,且含量各不相同。在土壤样本中,SAs的检出率(68%)高于TCs(57%)和FQs(27%)。VAs的总浓度范围从未检出(n.d.)到275 ng/g,而土霉素(CTC)是土壤样本中含量最高的VAs(275 ng/g)。在粪便样本中,SAs的检出率最高(100%),其次是TCs(89%)和FQs(78%)。VAs残留的总浓度范围从未检出到105 ng/g,其中粪便中CTC高达91 ng/g。在植物/蔬菜样本中,TCs的检出率最高(58%),而磺胺二甲嘧啶(SDM)含量最高(32 ng/g)。植物/蔬菜样本中VAs的总浓度范围从未检出到65 ng/g。动物产品中未检测到目标VAs。对不同垂直深度以及距粪便堆积点不同水平距离的土壤样本中VAs成分的测量表明,VAs部分保留在饲养场的土壤中,并在水平和垂直方向上扩散到周围环境中。由于在SSLFs的大多数采样粪便和土壤中都能发现VAs,因此怀疑检测到的VAs可能会在农业土壤中积累。这些结果凸显了考虑SSLFs的做法来管理粪便的积累和处置以减轻和控制VA污染的必要性。