• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测误差对人类显性注意力和学习的影响。

The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.

作者信息

Torrents-Rodas David, Koenig Stephan, Uengoer Metin, Lachnit Harald

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Department of Psychology, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2023 Mar;206:104843. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104843. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104843
PMID:36758733
Abstract

It has been suggested that attention modulates the speed at which cues come to predict contingent outcomes, and that attention changes with the prediction errors generated by cues. Evidence for this interaction in humans is inconsistent, with divergent findings depending on whether attention was measured with eye fixations or learning speed. We included both measures in our experiment. Initially, predictive cues (A and B) were consistently followed by one outcome (o1), while nonpredictive cues (X and Y) were followed by two randomly alternating outcomes (o1 and o2). Consistent with an effect of prediction error, participants' fixated for longer on the nonpredictive cues than on the predictive ones. Then, the cues were combined in three pairs: AX, followed by o1, and AY and BX, followed by o2. Discrimination of AX and AY depended on the previously nonpredictive cues and, given that these received more attention during initial training, it should proceed faster than discrimination of AX and BX, which depended on the previously predictive cues. However, participants learned to predict the outcomes of AY and BX at a similar rate. The fixation times were similar for the previously predictive and previously nonpredictive cues. We discuss reasons that could explain these findings.

摘要

有人提出,注意力会调节线索预测偶然结果的速度,并且注意力会随着线索产生的预测误差而变化。关于这种相互作用在人类中的证据并不一致,根据注意力是通过注视还是学习速度来衡量,会有不同的结果。我们在实验中纳入了这两种测量方法。最初,预测性线索(A和B)之后总是跟着一个结果(o1),而非预测性线索(X和Y)之后跟着两个随机交替的结果(o1和o2)。与预测误差的影响一致,参与者对非预测性线索的注视时间比对预测性线索的注视时间更长。然后,线索被组合成三对:AX,之后跟着o1;AY和BX,之后跟着o2。对AX和AY的辨别取决于先前的非预测性线索,鉴于这些线索在初始训练期间受到更多关注,它应该比取决于先前预测性线索的AX和BX的辨别进行得更快。然而,参与者以相似的速度学会预测AY和BX的结果。先前的预测性线索和先前的非预测性线索的注视时间相似。我们讨论了可以解释这些发现的原因。

相似文献

1
The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.预测误差对人类显性注意力和学习的影响。
Behav Processes. 2023 Mar;206:104843. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104843. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
A rise in prediction error increases attention to irrelevant cues.预测误差的增加会增加对不相关线索的注意力。
Biol Psychol. 2021 Feb;159:108007. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.108007. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
A test for a difference in the associability of blocked and uninformative cues in human predictive learning.一项关于人类预测性学习中阻塞性线索与非信息性线索关联性差异的测试。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):222-237. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1345957. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.不确定性的出现通过增加对线索的关注促进新关联的学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):193-208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1363257. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions.条件反射过程中的偶然与附带情境加工:兴奋性毒性海马加齿状回损伤后的分离
Hippocampus. 1998;8(2):147-59. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:2<147::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-I.
6
Evidence for two attentional mechanisms during learning.学习过程中两种注意机制的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Dec;74(12):2112-2123. doi: 10.1177/17470218211019308. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.人类联想学习中可联想性与关系结构的转移
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):125-142. doi: 10.1037/xan0000197. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
8
The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.冗余线索的命运:对冗余效应的进一步分析。
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):72-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0162-x.
9
The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning: The outcome ratio effect.人类预测性学习中多余线索的命运:结果比率效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1945-1960. doi: 10.1177/1747021818820042. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.线索竞争影响双条件辨别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):182-192. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1363256. Epub 2018 Jan 1.