Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, Otto-Von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation (GC-I3), Medical Faculty, Otto-Von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Neuroinflammation. 2023 Feb 9;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02711-2.
Patients with COVID-19 can have a variety of neurological symptoms, but the active involvement of central nervous system (CNS) in COVID-19 remains unclear. While routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses in patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19 generally show no or only mild inflammation, more detailed data on inflammatory mediators in the CSF of patients with COVID-19 are scarce. We studied the inflammatory response in paired CSF and serum samples of patients with COVID-19 (n = 38). Patients with herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSVE, n = 10) and patients with non-inflammatory, non-neurodegenerative neurological diseases (n = 28) served as controls. We used proteomics, enzyme-linked immunoassays, and semiquantitative cytokine arrays to characterize inflammatory proteins. Autoantibody screening was performed with cell-based assays and native tissue staining. RNA sequencing of long-non-coding RNA and circular RNA was done to study the transcriptome. Proteomics on single protein level and subsequent pathway analysis showed similar yet strongly attenuated inflammatory changes in the CSF of COVID-19 patients compared to HSVE patients with, e.g., downregulation of the apolipoproteins and extracellular matrix proteins. Protein upregulation of the complement system, the serpin proteins pathways, and other proteins including glycoproteins alpha-2 and alpha-1 acid. Importantly, calculation of interleukin-6, interleukin-16, and CXCL10 CSF/serum indices suggest that these inflammatory mediators reach the CSF from the systemic circulation, rather than being produced within the CNS. Antibody screening revealed no pathological levels of known neuronal autoantibodies. When stratifying COVID-19 patients into those with and without bacterial superinfection as indicated by elevated procalcitonin levels, inflammatory markers were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in those with bacterial superinfection. RNA sequencing in the CSF revealed 101 linear RNAs comprising messenger RNAs, and two circRNAs being significantly differentially expressed in COVID-19 than in non-neuroinflammatory controls and neurodegenerative patients. Our findings may explain the absence of signs of intrathecal inflammation upon routine CSF testing despite the presence of SARS-CoV2 infection-associated neurological symptoms. The relevance of blood-derived mediators of inflammation in the CSF for neurological COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 symptoms deserves further investigation.
COVID-19 患者可能会出现各种神经系统症状,但 COVID-19 对中枢神经系统(CNS)的活跃影响仍不清楚。虽然 COVID-19 有神经系统表现的患者的常规脑脊液(CSF)分析通常显示无或仅有轻度炎症,但 COVID-19 患者 CSF 中炎症介质的更详细数据却很少。我们研究了 38 例 COVID-19 患者配对的 CSF 和血清样本中的炎症反应。单纯疱疹病毒脑炎(HSVE,n=10)和非炎症性、非神经退行性神经疾病(n=28)患者作为对照。我们使用蛋白质组学、酶联免疫吸附试验和半定量细胞因子阵列来描述炎症蛋白。使用基于细胞的检测和天然组织染色进行自身抗体筛查。进行长非编码 RNA 和环状 RNA 的 RNA 测序以研究转录组。对单个蛋白水平的蛋白质组学和随后的通路分析表明,COVID-19 患者的 CSF 中存在类似但强烈减弱的炎症变化,例如载脂蛋白和细胞外基质蛋白下调。补体系统、丝氨酸蛋白酶途径和其他蛋白(包括糖蛋白 alpha-2 和 alpha-1 酸性)的蛋白上调。重要的是,计算白细胞介素 6、白细胞介素 16 和 CXCL10 CSF/血清指数表明,这些炎症介质是从全身循环进入 CSF 的,而不是在 CNS 内产生的。抗体筛查未发现已知神经元自身抗体的病理性水平。当根据降钙素原水平升高将 COVID-19 患者分为伴有和不伴有细菌合并感染的亚组时,伴有细菌合并感染的患者的炎症标志物显著(p<0.01)升高。CSF 中的 RNA 测序显示,在 COVID-19 患者中,有 101 个线性 RNA 包括信使 RNA 和两个 circRNA 与非神经炎症对照和神经退行性疾病患者相比存在显著差异表达。我们的发现可以解释为什么尽管存在 SARS-CoV2 感染相关的神经系统症状,但常规 CSF 检测仍未显示出鞘内炎症的迹象。在 CSF 中,炎症的血液来源介质对 COVID-19 神经症状和 COVID-19 后症状的相关性值得进一步研究。