Wilson Emma, Onwumere Juliana, Hirsch Colette
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Clin Psychol Eur. 2022 Dec 22;4(4):e10313. doi: 10.32872/cpe.10313. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Unpaid caregivers have faced and dealt with additional challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological processes associated with their resilience is warranted. The objective of this study was to examine the associations between resilience with mental distress, emotion regulation strategies (i.e., reappraisal and suppression) and interpretation bias in adult caregivers.
Participants were living in the UK, aged 18+, and consisted of 182 unpaid caregivers of an adult aged 18+ living with a long-term health condition, and 120 non-caregivers. Data were collected in an online study during the first national UK COVID-19 lockdown (May and September 2020). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses explored whether emotion regulation strategies and interpretation bias explained unique variance in levels of resilience in caregivers whilst controlling for anxiety and depression.
Compared to non-caregivers, caregivers reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, negative interpretation bias and lower levels of resilience. Emotion regulation strategies did not differ between groups. Within caregivers, greater resilience was associated with lower mood disturbance, a positive interpretation bias, and greater use of cognitive reappraisal and lower use of suppression strategies to regulate emotions. Emotion regulation and interpretation bias together predicted an additional 15% of variance in current levels of resilience.
Our findings indicate that psychological mechanisms such as emotion regulation strategies, particularly reappraisal, and interpretation bias are associated with resilience in caregivers. Although preliminary, our findings speak to exciting clinical possibilities that could form the target of interventions to improve resilience and lower mental distress in unpaid caregivers.
在新冠疫情期间,无偿照料者面临并应对了额外的挑战。有必要了解与他们的复原力相关的心理过程。本研究的目的是探讨成年照料者的复原力与心理困扰、情绪调节策略(即重新评价和抑制)以及解释偏差之间的关联。
参与者居住在英国,年龄在18岁及以上,包括182名18岁及以上患有长期健康状况的成年无偿照料者和120名非照料者。数据是在英国首次全国新冠疫情封锁期间(2020年5月和9月)通过在线研究收集的。分层多元回归分析探讨了情绪调节策略和解释偏差是否在控制焦虑和抑郁的同时,解释了照料者复原力水平的独特差异。
与非照料者相比,照料者报告的焦虑、抑郁、消极解释偏差水平更高,复原力水平更低。两组之间的情绪调节策略没有差异。在照料者中,更强的复原力与更低的情绪困扰、积极的解释偏差以及更多地使用认知重新评价和更少地使用抑制策略来调节情绪有关。情绪调节和解释偏差共同预测了当前复原力水平中另外15%的差异。
我们的研究结果表明,情绪调节策略,尤其是重新评价,以及解释偏差等心理机制与照料者的复原力有关。尽管是初步的,但我们的研究结果揭示了令人兴奋的临床可能性,这些可能性可能成为干预措施的目标,以提高无偿照料者的复原力并降低其心理困扰。