• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for and Characteristics of Pharmacy-Dispensed Buprenorphine Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment by Type of Payer, 2015 to 2020.2015 年至 2020 年按支付类型划分的用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药房配给丁丙诺啡药物的自付费用和特征趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54590.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Buprenorphine and Extended-Release Naltrexone Filled Prescriptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮控释制剂的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14765.
3
A comparison of costs of Medicare Part D prescriptions dispensed at retail and mail order pharmacies.比较在零售和邮购药店配药的医疗保险处方药 D 部分的成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):959-67. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.959.
4
Patient, prescriber, and Community factors associated with filled naloxone prescriptions among patients receiving buprenorphine 2017-18.2017-18 年接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者中,与纳洛酮处方填写相关的患者、处方医生和社区因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108569. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108569. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Buprenorphine Use and Spending for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Trends From 2003 to 2015.美沙酮使用与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗费用:2003 年至 2015 年趋势
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):832-835. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700315. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
Vital Signs: Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Dispensing - United States, 2012-2018.生命体征:2012-2018 年美国基于药房的纳洛酮配药情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 9;68(31):679-686. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6831e1.
7
Barriers to Buprenorphine Dispensing by Medicaid-Participating Community Retail Pharmacies.参与医疗补助计划的社区零售药店配给丁丙诺啡的障碍。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 May 3;5(5):e241077. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1077.
8
Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Naloxone by Drug Brand and Payer in the US, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国按药物品牌和支付方划分的纳洛酮自付费用趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222663. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2663.
9
Do out-of-pocket costs influence retention and adherence to medications for opioid use disorder?自付费用是否会影响阿片类药物使用障碍药物的保留和依从性?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108784. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108784. Epub 2021 May 21.
10
Changes in Buprenorphine-Naloxone and Opioid Pain Reliever Prescriptions After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion.平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助计划后丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮和阿片类止痛药处方的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181588. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1588.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to accessing medications for opioid use disorder among rural individuals.农村地区个体在获取阿片类物质使用障碍药物方面的障碍。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jun;140:104805. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104805. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
2
Trends in Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.阿片类物质使用障碍药物获取趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Apr 4;6(4):e250393. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0393.
3
Individuals Dispensed Buprenorphine in the United States Before and After Federal Policy Changes Aimed at Increasing Access.在美国,旨在增加可及性的联邦政策变化前后接受丁丙诺啡治疗的个体。
J Addict Med. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001457.
4
Enhancing Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: An Economic Evaluation of Improving Medication Adherence for Buprenorphine Through Blister-Packaging.改善阿片类物质使用障碍治疗效果:通过泡罩包装提高丁丙诺啡药物依从性的经济学评估
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2024 Oct 22;15:209-222. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S484831. eCollection 2024.
5
Payment-related barriers to medications for opioid use disorder: A critical review of the literature and real-world application.支付相关的阿片类药物使用障碍治疗障碍:文献综述及真实世界应用的批判性评价。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Oct;165:209441. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209441. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
Use of in-network insurance benefits is critical for improving retention in telehealth-based buprenorphine treatment.使用网络内保险福利对于提高基于远程医疗的丁丙诺啡治疗的留存率至关重要。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jan 30;2(3):qxae009. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Out-of-pocket spending and health care utilization associated with initiation of different medications for opioid use disorder: Findings from a national commercially insured cohort.与阿片类药物使用障碍的不同药物治疗起始相关的自付支出和医疗保健利用:来自全国商业保险队列的研究结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Apr;159:209281. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209281. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Sources of nonmedically used prescription psychotherapeutic drugs using real-world data from adolescents and adults assessed for substance use treatment--2014-2022.利用 2014-2022 年接受物质使用治疗评估的青少年和成年人的真实世界数据,评估非医疗使用处方精神治疗药物的来源。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
9
Trends in Drug Spending of Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation, 2014-2021.2014-2021 年口服抗凝药物治疗心房颤动的药物支出趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Mar;66(3):463-472. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Opioid Agonist Treatment With All-Cause Mortality and Specific Causes of Death Among People With Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿片类激动剂治疗与阿片类药物依赖患者全因死亡率及特定死因的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):979-993. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976.
2
Do out-of-pocket costs influence retention and adherence to medications for opioid use disorder?自付费用是否会影响阿片类药物使用障碍药物的保留和依从性?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108784. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108784. Epub 2021 May 21.
3
Buprenorphine Use and Spending for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Trends From 2003 to 2015.美沙酮使用与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗费用:2003 年至 2015 年趋势
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):832-835. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700315. Epub 2018 May 8.
4
Primary care-based buprenorphine taper vs maintenance therapy for prescription opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial.基于初级保健的丁丙诺啡递减疗法与维持治疗用于处方类阿片类药物依赖:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1947-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5302.
5
Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial.在短期和长期丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗处方阿片类药物依赖期间的辅助咨询:一项两阶段随机对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;68(12):1238-46. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.121. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

2015 年至 2020 年按支付类型划分的用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药房配给丁丙诺啡药物的自付费用和特征趋势。

Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for and Characteristics of Pharmacy-Dispensed Buprenorphine Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment by Type of Payer, 2015 to 2020.

机构信息

Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54590.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54590
PMID:36763363
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9918874/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Buprenorphine has been approved for opioid use disorder treatment, yet remains underutilized. Cost may present a barrier; little is known about how out-of-pocket costs vary.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if out-of-pocket costs and prescription characteristics for buprenorphine varied by type of payer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used all-payer data on retail pharmacy-dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2020, for adults (aged ≥18 years) in the US, excluding formulations primarily used to treat pain. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to June 2022.

EXPOSURES

Type of payer (private and commercial, self-pay, Medicaid, Medicare, assistance, and unknown) for dispensed prescription.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All outcomes are prescription-level. Mean and median daily out-of-pocket costs were calculated overall and by payer type. Prescription characteristics (days supplied, patient age and sex, generic vs name brand formulations, and prescriber's location) were examined by payer type.

RESULTS

Although mean daily out-of-pocket costs decreased overall from $4.79 (95% CI, $4.79-$4.80) in 2015 (7 375 508 prescriptions) to $1.91 (95% CI, $1.90-$1.91) in 2020 (13 486 822 prescriptions), out-of-pocket costs continued to vary by payer in 2020. Medicaid had the lowest mean daily out-of-pocket cost across all years-$0.18 (95% CI, $0.18-$0.18) in 2015, and $0.10 (95% CI, $0.10-$0.10) in 2020. Private and commercial paid prescriptions fell from $4.80 (95% CI, $4.79-$4.81) per day in 2015 to $1.82 (95% CI, $1.82-$1.83) in 2020. Self-pay and assistance categories had the highest mean daily out-of-pocket costs across study years ($9.76 [95% CI, $9.74-$9.78] and $8.72 [95% CI, $8.71-$8.73], respectively, in 2015; $8.44 [95% CI, $8.43-$8.46] and $6.31 [95% CI, $6.30-$6.31], respectively, in 2020). Medicaid paid prescriptions had a mean supply of 15.59 days (95% CI, 15.58-15.59 days) and the lowest percentage of generic prescriptions (57.88%; 95% CI, 57.84%-57.92%). Out-of-pocket cost varied by prescriber location and patient characteristics; mean costs were highest for prescriptions written in the South ($2.91; 95% CI, $2.90-$2.91), metropolitan counties ($1.93; 95% CI, $1.93-$1.93), and for individuals aged 35 to 44 years ($2.10; 95% CI, $2.09-$2.10).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that mean daily out-of-pocket costs for buprenorphine were lower in 2020 than in 2015, but variation by payer existed in all study years. Financial barriers to accessing and maintaining buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment may exist and differ by type of prescription coverage. Future research could monitor costs and identify potential barriers that may impact access and retention in care.

摘要

重要性

丁丙诺啡已被批准用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍,但仍未得到充分利用。费用可能是一个障碍;对于丁丙诺啡的自付费用如何因支付方类型而异,知之甚少。

目的

确定丁丙诺啡的自付费用和处方特征是否因支付方类型而异。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究使用了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间美国所有支付方的零售药房配药丁丙诺啡处方的所有支付方数据,排除了主要用于治疗疼痛的配方。数据于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月进行分析。

暴露

配药处方的支付方类型(私人和商业、自付、医疗补助、医疗保险、援助和未知)。

主要结果和措施

所有结果均为处方水平。计算了总体和按支付方类型的平均和中位数每日自付费用。按支付方类型检查了处方特征(供应天数、患者年龄和性别、通用与品牌配方以及处方医生的所在地)。

结果

尽管 2015 年(7375508 份处方)的平均每日自付费用从 4.79 美元(95%CI,4.79-4.80 美元)降至 2020 年的 1.91 美元(95%CI,1.90-1.91 美元),但 2020 年的自付费用仍因支付方类型而异。在所有年份中,医疗补助的平均每日自付费用最低-2015 年为 0.18 美元(95%CI,0.18-0.18 美元),2020 年为 0.10 美元(95%CI,0.10-0.10 美元)。私人和商业支付的处方从 2015 年的每天 4.80 美元(95%CI,4.79-4.81 美元)降至 2020 年的 1.82 美元(95%CI,1.82-1.83 美元)。自我支付和援助类别的平均每日自付费用在研究期间最高(2015 年分别为 9.76 美元(95%CI,9.74-9.78 美元)和 8.72 美元(95%CI,8.71-8.73 美元),2020 年分别为 8.44 美元(95%CI,8.43-8.46 美元)和 6.31 美元(95%CI,6.30-6.31 美元))。医疗补助支付的处方供应天数平均为 15.59 天(95%CI,15.58-15.59 天),通用处方的比例最低(57.88%;95%CI,57.84%-57.92%)。自付费用因处方医生所在地和患者特征而异;南部(2.91 美元;95%CI,2.90-2.91 美元)、大都市县(1.93 美元;95%CI,1.93-1.93 美元)和 35 至 44 岁的个体(2.10 美元;95%CI,2.09-2.10 美元)的处方平均费用最高。

结论和相关性

本横断面研究发现,2020 年丁丙诺啡的平均每日自付费用低于 2015 年,但所有研究年份的支付方类型都存在差异。获得和维持阿片类药物使用障碍治疗用丁丙诺啡可能存在经济障碍,且因处方覆盖类型而异。未来的研究可以监测成本,并确定可能影响获得和保留治疗的潜在障碍。