Weiss Roger D, Potter Jennifer Sharpe, Fiellin David A, Byrne Marilyn, Connery Hilary S, Dickinson William, Gardin John, Griffin Margaret L, Gourevitch Marc N, Haller Deborah L, Hasson Albert L, Huang Zhen, Jacobs Petra, Kosinski Andrzej S, Lindblad Robert, McCance-Katz Elinore F, Provost Scott E, Selzer Jeffrey, Somoza Eugene C, Sonne Susan C, Ling Walter
Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;68(12):1238-46. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.121. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
No randomized trials have examined treatments for prescription opioid dependence, despite its increasing prevalence.
To evaluate the efficacy of brief and extended buprenorphine hydrochloride-naloxone hydrochloride treatment, with different counseling intensities, for patients dependent on prescription opioids.
Multisite, randomized clinical trial using a 2-phase adaptive treatment research design. Brief treatment (phase 1) included 2-week buprenorphine-naloxone stabilization, 2-week taper, and 8-week postmedication follow-up. Patients with successful opioid use outcomes exited the study; unsuccessful patients entered phase 2: extended (12-week) buprenorphine-naloxone treatment, 4-week taper, and 8-week postmedication follow-up.
Ten US sites. Patients A total of 653 treatment-seeking outpatients dependent on prescription opioids.
In both phases, patients were randomized to standard medical management (SMM) or SMM plus opioid dependence counseling; all received buprenorphine-naloxone.
Predefined "successful outcome" in each phase: composite measures indicating minimal or no opioid use based on urine test-confirmed self-reports.
During phase 1, only 6.6% (43 of 653) of patients had successful outcomes, with no difference between SMM and SMM plus opioid dependence counseling. In contrast, 49.2% (177 of 360) attained successful outcomes in phase 2 during extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment (week 12), with no difference between counseling conditions. Success rates 8 weeks after completing the buprenorphine-naloxone taper (phase 2, week 24) dropped to 8.6% (31 of 360), again with no counseling difference. In secondary analyses, successful phase 2 outcomes were more common while taking buprenorphine-naloxone than 8 weeks after taper (49.2% [177 of 360] vs 8.6% [31 of 360], P < .001). Chronic pain did not affect opioid use outcomes; a history of ever using heroin was associated with lower phase 2 success rates while taking buprenorphine-naloxone.
Prescription opioid-dependent patients are most likely to reduce opioid use during buprenorphine-naloxone treatment; if tapered off buprenorphine-naloxone, even after 12 weeks of treatment, the likelihood of an unsuccessful outcome is high, even in patients receiving counseling in addition to SMM.
尽管处方阿片类药物依赖的患病率不断上升,但尚无随机试验对其治疗方法进行研究。
评估不同咨询强度的短期和长期盐酸丁丙诺啡 - 盐酸纳洛酮治疗对处方阿片类药物依赖患者的疗效。
采用两阶段适应性治疗研究设计的多中心随机临床试验。短期治疗(第1阶段)包括为期2周的丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮稳定期、为期2周的减量期以及停药后8周的随访。阿片类药物使用结果成功的患者退出研究;未成功的患者进入第2阶段:长期(12周)丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗、为期4周的减量期以及停药后8周的随访。
美国的10个地点。患者共有653名寻求治疗的依赖处方阿片类药物的门诊患者。
在两个阶段中,患者均被随机分配至标准医疗管理(SMM)组或SMM加阿片类药物依赖咨询组;所有患者均接受丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗。
每个阶段预先定义的“成功结局”:基于尿检测证实的自我报告,综合指标表明阿片类药物使用极少或未使用。
在第1阶段,只有6.6%(653名中的43名)的患者获得成功结局,SMM组和SMM加阿片类药物依赖咨询组之间无差异。相比之下,在第2阶段长期丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗期间(第12周),49.2%(360名中的177名)获得成功结局,咨询条件之间无差异。完成丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮减量(第2阶段,第24周)后8周的成功率降至8.6%(360名中的31名),咨询方面同样无差异。在二次分析中,第2阶段成功结局在服用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮时比减量后8周更常见(49.2% [360名中的177名] 对8.6% [360名中的31名],P <.001)。慢性疼痛不影响阿片类药物使用结果;有海洛因使用史与服用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮时第2阶段成功率较低相关。
处方阿片类药物依赖患者在丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗期间最有可能减少阿片类药物使用;如果停用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮,即使经过12周治疗,即使在接受SMM加咨询的患者中,未成功结局的可能性也很高。