Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181588. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1588.
Expanding Medicaid eligibility could affect prescriptions of buprenorphine with naloxone, an established treatment for opioid use disorder, and opioid pain relievers (OPRs).
To examine changes in prescriptions of buprenorphine with naloxone and OPRs after the US Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, longitudinal, patient-level, retail pharmacy claims were extracted from IQVIA real-world data from an anonymized, longitudinal, prescription database. The sample included 11.9 million individuals who filled 2 or more prescriptions for a prescription opioid during at least 1 year between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, from California, Maryland, and Washington (expansion states) and Florida and Georgia (nonexpansion states). Data analysis was conducted from August 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018. Data were aggregated to county-year observations (N = 2082) and linked to county-level covariates. For each outcome, a difference-in-differences regression model was estimated comparing changes before and after expansion in expansion vs nonexpansion counties. Models were adjusted for county demographics, uninsured rate, and overdose mortality in the baseline year (2010).
Presence of Medicaid expansion in the year.
For buprenorphine with naloxone and OPRs, rates per 100 000 county residents were calculated separately for any prescriptions overall and by different payment sources. Mean days of medication per county among people filling prescriptions for these agents were also determined.
The study sample included 11.9 million individuals (expansion states: 40.9% men; mean [SD] age, 44.1 [13.8] years; nonexpansion states: 41.0% men; mean [SD] age, 43.7 [13.7] years). In expansion counties, 68.8 individuals per 100 000 county residents filled buprenorphine with naloxone and 5298.3 filled OPR prescriptions in 2010. After expansion, buprenorphine with naloxone fills per 100 000 county residents increased significantly in expansion relative to nonexpansion counties (8.7; 95% CI, 1.7 to 15.7). Opioid pain reliever fills per 100 000 county residents did not significantly change in expansion counties relative to nonexpansion counties (327.4; 95% CI -202.5 to 857.4). The rate of OPRs per 100 000 county residents paid for by Medicaid significantly increased (374.0; 95% CI, 258.3 to 489.7). There were no significant changes in days per 100 000 county residents of either medication after expansion.
Medicaid expansion significantly increased buprenorphine with naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 county residents in expansion counties, suggesting that expansion improved access to opioid use disorder treatment. Expansion did not significantly increase the overall rate per 100 000 county residents of OPR prescriptions, but increased the population with OPRs paid for by Medicaid. This finding therefore suggests the growing importance of Medicaid in pain management and addiction prevention.
扩大医疗补助计划的资格可能会影响丁丙诺啡纳洛酮(一种治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的既定药物)和阿片类止痛药(OPR)的处方。
在美国平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助计划后,检查丁丙诺啡纳洛酮和 OPR 的处方变化。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项队列研究中,从 IQVIA 真实世界数据中提取了纵向、患者水平、零售药房的索赔数据,该数据来自一个匿名的、纵向的、处方数据库。该样本包括 1190 万人,他们在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间至少有一年时间内,有两次或两次以上处方的处方药阿片类药物,来自加利福尼亚州、马里兰州和华盛顿州(扩大州)和佛罗里达州和佐治亚州(非扩大州)。数据分析于 2017 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 5 月 31 日进行。数据被汇总到县年观察值(N=2082)并与县一级的协变量相关联。对于每个结果,通过在扩大州和县与非扩大州进行差异的差异回归模型来估计扩张前后的变化。模型调整了县人口统计学、未参保率和基线年份(2010 年)的过量死亡率。
当年是否有医疗补助计划的扩张。
对于丁丙诺啡纳洛酮和 OPR,分别计算了全县所有处方和不同支付来源的处方率(每 10 万人中有多少人)。还确定了在这些药物的处方中有多少人平均每天用药。
研究样本包括 1190 万人(扩大州:40.9%的男性;平均[标准差]年龄,44.1[13.8]岁;非扩大州:41.0%的男性;平均[标准差]年龄,43.7[13.7]岁)。在扩大县,每 10 万县居民中有 68.8 人填写丁丙诺啡纳洛酮,2010 年有 5298.3 人填写 OPR 处方。扩张后,与非扩张县相比,丁丙诺啡纳洛酮的扩张县居民每 10 万县居民的处方量显著增加(8.7;95%CI,1.7 至 15.7)。OPR 每 10 万县居民的处方量在扩张县与非扩张县之间没有显著变化(327.4;95%CI-202.5 至 857.4)。每 10 万县居民由医疗补助计划支付的 OPR 处方率显著增加(374.0;95%CI,258.3 至 489.7)。扩张后,两种药物的每 10 万县居民的用药天数都没有明显变化。
医疗补助计划的扩大显著增加了扩张县每 10 万县居民的丁丙诺啡纳洛酮处方量,这表明扩张计划改善了阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗机会。扩张并没有显著增加全县 OPR 处方的总体比例,但增加了由医疗补助计划支付的 OPR 人群。因此,这一发现表明医疗补助计划在疼痛管理和成瘾预防方面的重要性日益增加。