• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对七个国家推荐食品政策责任的看法。

Public perceptions of responsibility for recommended food policies in seven countries.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):299-304. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad020.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckad020
PMID:36763587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food policy is important to promote healthy and sustainable diets. However, who is responsible for developing and implementing food policy remains contentious. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how the public attributes responsibility for food policy to governments, individuals and the private sector.

METHODS

A total of 7559 respondents from seven countries [Australia (n = 1033), Canada (n = 1079), China (n = 1099), India (n = 1086), New Zealand (n = 1090), the UK (n = 1079) and the USA (n = 1093)] completed an online survey assessing perceived responsibility for 11 recommended food policies.

RESULTS

Overall, preferred responsibility for the assessed food policies was primarily attributed to governments (62%), followed by the private sector (49%) and individuals (31%). Respondents from New Zealand expressed the highest support for government responsibility (70%) and those from the USA the lowest (50%). Respondents from the USA and India were most likely to nominate individuals as responsible (both 37%), while those from China were least likely (23%). The private sector had the highest attributed responsibility in New Zealand (55%) and the lowest in China and the USA (both 47%). Support for government responsibility declined with age and was higher among those on higher incomes, with a university degree, and who perceived themselves to consume a healthy diet or be in poor health.

CONCLUSIONS

Across seven diverse countries, results indicate the public considers government should take primary responsibility for the assessed food policies, with modest contribution from the private sector and minority support for individual responsibility.

摘要

背景

食品政策对于促进健康和可持续饮食非常重要。然而,谁负责制定和实施食品政策仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在调查公众如何将食品政策的责任归因于政府、个人和私营部门。

方法

本研究共纳入来自七个国家的 7559 名受访者[澳大利亚(n=1033)、加拿大(n=1079)、中国(n=1099)、印度(n=1086)、新西兰(n=1090)、英国(n=1079)和美国(n=1093)],他们完成了一项在线调查,评估了对 11 项推荐食品政策的感知责任。

结果

总体而言,受访者首选的食品政策责任主要归因于政府(62%),其次是私营部门(49%)和个人(31%)。新西兰受访者对政府责任的支持度最高(70%),美国受访者最低(50%)。美国和印度的受访者最有可能将个人视为负责方(均为 37%),而中国的受访者最不可能(23%)。新西兰私营部门的责任归因最高(55%),中国和美国最低(均为 47%)。随着年龄的增长,对政府责任的支持度下降,收入较高、拥有大学学历、认为自己饮食健康或健康状况不佳的受访者对政府责任的支持度更高。

结论

在七个不同的国家中,结果表明公众认为政府应承担评估食品政策的主要责任,私营部门应适度参与,个人责任的支持度较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f023/10066496/d099e6c5abbd/ckad020f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f023/10066496/e142a1272350/ckad020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f023/10066496/d099e6c5abbd/ckad020f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f023/10066496/e142a1272350/ckad020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f023/10066496/d099e6c5abbd/ckad020f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Public perceptions of responsibility for recommended food policies in seven countries.公众对七个国家推荐食品政策责任的看法。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):299-304. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad020.
2
Public perceptions of responsibility for alcohol control actions by actor type in seven countries.公众对七个国家不同行为者类型控制酒精行动的责任看法。
Addict Behav. 2023 Jan;136:107486. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107486. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
3
A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study.多国公众对促进健康饮食的食品政策支持的调查:国际食品政策研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):1205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7483-9.
4
An examination of public support for 35 nutrition interventions across seven countries.对七个国家的 35 项营养干预措施的公众支持情况进行考察。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;77(2):235-245. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01211-5. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Local government policy to facilitate healthy and sustainable diets and the broader policy hierarchy: insights from Milan Urban Food Policy Pact cities.地方政府促进健康和可持续饮食的政策与更广泛的政策层次:来自米兰城市粮食政策契约城市的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 24;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00988-6.
6
Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study.衡量和推动广泛推荐的食品环境政策实施进展:新西兰案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jan 25;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0278-0.
7
National policies to prevent obesity in early childhood: Using policy mapping to compare policy lessons for Australia with six developed countries.国家预防幼儿肥胖政策:利用政策图谱比较澳大利亚与六个发达国家的政策经验。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20(11):1542-1556. doi: 10.1111/obr.12925. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
8
Synergies between veterinarians and para-professionals in the public and private sectors: organisational and institutional relationships that facilitate the process of privatising animal health services in developing countries.公共和私营部门兽医与辅助专业人员之间的协同作用:促进发展中国家动物卫生服务私有化进程的组织和机构关系。
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Apr;23(1):115-35; discussion 391-401. doi: 10.20506/rst.23.1.1472.
9
Benchmarking for accountability on obesity prevention: evaluation of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) in Australia (2016-2020).肥胖预防问责制的基准测试:澳大利亚健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的评估(2016-2020 年)。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):488-497. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100447X. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Are perceptions of government intervention for prevention different by gender and age? Results from the AUStralian Perceptions Of Prevention Survey (AUSPOPS).人们对政府干预预防措施的看法是否因性别和年龄而异?来自澳大利亚预防措施看法调查(AUSPOPS)的结果。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106289. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106289. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
An examination of public support for 35 nutrition interventions across seven countries.对七个国家的 35 项营养干预措施的公众支持情况进行考察。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;77(2):235-245. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01211-5. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Public perceptions of responsibility for alcohol control actions by actor type in seven countries.公众对七个国家不同行为者类型控制酒精行动的责任看法。
Addict Behav. 2023 Jan;136:107486. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107486. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
3
Nutrient comparisons of margarine/margarine-like products, butter blend products and butter in the US marketplace in 2020 post-FDA ban on partially hydrogenated oils.
2020年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)禁止部分氢化油后,市场上人造黄油/类人造黄油产品、黄油混合产品和黄油的营养成分比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov 2;25(5):1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004511.
4
Co-benefits from sustainable dietary shifts for population and environmental health: an assessment from a large European cohort study.可持续饮食转变对人口和环境健康的共同效益:来自大型欧洲队列研究的评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Nov;5(11):e786-e796. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00250-3. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
5
Barriers and opportunities to restricting marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children in Nepal: a policy analysis.尼泊尔限制向儿童营销不健康食品和饮料的障碍和机遇:政策分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;21(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11257-y.
6
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买的软饮料变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254.
7
Research and innovation as a catalyst for food system transformation.研究与创新是推动粮食系统转型的催化剂。
Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;107:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
A Call for a National Agenda for a Healthy, Equitable, and Sustainable Food System.呼吁制定国家健康、公平和可持续食品系统议程。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1671-1673. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305926. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
The healthiness and sustainability of national and global food based dietary guidelines: modelling study.国家和全球基于食物的膳食指南的健康和可持续性:建模研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2322.
10
Mediterranean diet and health: A systematic review of epidemiological studies and intervention trials.地中海饮食与健康:系统评价流行病学研究和干预试验。
Maturitas. 2020 Jun;136:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 11.