• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国家庭购买的软饮料变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:对照中断时间序列分析。

Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.

Faculty of Health, School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.n254
PMID:33692200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7944367/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine changes in household purchases of drinks and confectionery one year after implementation of the UK soft drinks industry levy (SDIL).

DESIGN

Controlled interrupted time series analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of a panel of households reporting their purchasing on a weekly basis to a market research company (average weekly number of participants n=22 183), March 2014 to March 2019.

INTERVENTION

A two tiered tax levied on manufacturers of soft drinks, announced in March 2016 and implemented in April 2018. Drinks with ≥8 g sugar/100 mL (high tier) are taxed at £0.24/L and drinks with ≥5 to <8 g sugar/100 mL (low tier) are taxed at £0.18/L. Drinks with <5 g sugar/100 mL (no levy) are not taxed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Absolute and relative differences in the volume of, and amount of sugar in, soft drinks categories, all soft drinks combined, alcohol, and confectionery purchased per household per week one year after implementation of the SDIL compared with trends before the announcement of the SDIL.

RESULTS

In March 2019, compared with the counterfactual estimated from pre-announcement trends, purchased volume of drinks in the high levy tier decreased by 155 mL (95% confidence interval 240.5 to 69.5 mL) per household per week, equivalent to 44.3% (95% confidence interval 59.9% to 28.7%), and sugar purchased in these drinks decreased by 18.0 g (95% confidence interval 32.3 to 3.6 g), or 45.9% (68.8% to 22.9%). Purchases of low tier drinks decreased by 177.3 mL (225.3 to 129.3 mL) per household per week, or 85.9% (95.1% to 76.7%), with a 12.5 g (15.4 to 9.5 g) reduction in sugar in these drinks, equivalent to 86.2% (94.2% to 78.1%). Despite no overall change in volume of no levy drinks purchased, there was an increase in sugar purchased of 15.3 g (12.6 to 17.9 g) per household per week, equivalent to 166.4% (94.2% to 238.5%). When all soft drinks were combined, the volume of drinks purchased did not change, but sugar decreased by 29.5 g (55.8 to 3.1 g), or 9.8% (17.9% to 1.8%). Purchases of confectionery and alcoholic drinks did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with trends before the SDIL was announced, one year after implementation, the volume of soft drinks purchased did not change. The amount of sugar in those drinks was 30 g, or 10%, lower per household per week-equivalent to one 250 mL serving of a low tier drink per person per week. The SDIL might benefit public health without harming industry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN18042742.

摘要

目的

在英国软饮料行业征税(SDIL)实施一年后,确定家庭购买饮料和糖果的变化。

设计

对照中断时间序列分析。

参与者

向市场研究公司每周报告购买情况的家庭小组的成员(平均每周参与者人数 n=22183),2014 年 3 月至 2019 年 3 月。

干预措施

对软饮料制造商征收两级税,于 2016 年 3 月宣布,并于 2018 年 4 月实施。含糖量≥8g/100mL(高等级)的饮料每升征收 0.24 英镑的税,含糖量≥5g但<8g/100mL(低等级)的饮料每升征收 0.18 英镑的税,含糖量<5g/100mL(无征税)的饮料不征税。

主要观察指标

与 SDIL 宣布前的趋势相比,实施 SDIL 一年后,家庭每周购买的软饮料类别、所有软饮料、酒精和糖果的绝对和相对差异,以及每家庭每周购买的软饮料中的糖量。

结果

2019 年 3 月,与从预公告趋势估计的反事实相比,每个家庭每周购买的高征税等级饮料量减少了 155 毫升(95%置信区间为 240.5 至 69.5 毫升),相当于 44.3%(95%置信区间为 59.9%至 28.7%),且这些饮料中购买的糖减少了 18.0 克(95%置信区间为 32.3 至 3.6 克),相当于 45.9%(68.8%至 22.9%)。低征税等级饮料的购买量每周减少 177.3 毫升(225.3 至 129.3 毫升),相当于 85.9%(95.1%至 76.7%),其中糖的摄入量减少了 12.5 克(15.4 至 9.5 克),相当于 86.2%(94.2%至 78.1%)。尽管购买无征税饮料的总量没有变化,但每个家庭每周购买的糖量增加了 15.3 克(12.6 至 17.9 克),相当于 166.4%(94.2%至 238.5%)。当所有软饮料合并时,饮料购买量没有变化,但糖的含量减少了 29.5 克(55.8 至 3.1 克),或 9.8%(17.9%至 1.8%)。糖果和酒精饮料的购买量没有变化。

结论

与 SDIL 宣布前的趋势相比,实施一年后,家庭购买软饮料的数量没有变化。这些饮料中的含糖量减少了 30 克,或 10%,相当于每人每周少喝一份低等级饮料(每份 250 毫升)。SDIL 可能在不损害行业的情况下有益于公众健康。

试验注册

ISRCTN86545338。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/1e103ab58183/peld062092.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/5c0f6a853bac/peld062092.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/daa8c5da5f6d/peld062092.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/1e103ab58183/peld062092.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/5c0f6a853bac/peld062092.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/daa8c5da5f6d/peld062092.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68a/7944367/1e103ab58183/peld062092.f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买的软饮料变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254.
2
Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的预期变化与软饮料行业征税公告相关:一项基于对照的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 12;17(11):e1003269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003269. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:一项对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 5;13(12):e077059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077059.
4
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
The impact of the UK soft drink industry levy on the soft drink marketplace, 2017-2020: An interrupted time series analysis with comparator series.2017-2020 年英国软饮料行业征税对软饮料市场的影响:基于比较序列的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0301890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301890. eCollection 2024.
6
The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.英国软饮料行业征税对制造商国内营业额的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100866. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Estimated changes in free sugar consumption one year after the UK soft drinks industry levy came into force: controlled interrupted time series analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2011-2019).英国软饮料行业征税实施一年后,游离糖摄入量的预估变化:国家饮食与营养调查(2011-2019)的对照中断时间序列分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Aug 9;78(9):578-584. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-221051.
8
An analysis of the stock market reaction to the announcements of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy.对英国软饮料行业征税公告对股市反应的分析。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100834. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
Impact of the UK soft drinks industry levy on health and health inequalities in children and adolescents in England: An interrupted time series analysis and population health modelling study.英国软饮料行业征税对英格兰儿童和青少年健康和健康不平等的影响:一项中断时间序列分析和人群健康建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Mar 28;21(3):e1004371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004371. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Industry views of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a thematic analysis of elite interviews with food and drink industry professionals, 2018-2020.行业视角下的英国软饮料行业征税:对食品和饮料行业专业人士的精英访谈的主题分析,2018-2020 年。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e072223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072223.

引用本文的文献

1
How is health equity considered in policy evaluations employing quasi-experimental methods? A scoping review and content analysis.在采用准实验方法的政策评估中,如何考量健康公平性?一项范围综述与内容分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Feb 1;35(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae188.
2
Ultra-processed food consumption in UK adolescents: distribution, trends, and sociodemographic correlates using the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008/09 to 2018/19.英国青少年超加工食品消费:使用 2008/09 年至 2018/19 年全国饮食和营养调查数据的分布、趋势和社会人口学相关性
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Oct;63(7):2709-2723. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03458-z. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的预期变化与软饮料行业征税公告相关:一项基于对照的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 12;17(11):e1003269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003269. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
3
The equitable impact of sugary drink taxation structures on sugary drink consumption among Canadians: a modelling study using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.
含糖饮料税收结构对加拿大人含糖饮料消费的公平影响:一项使用2015年加拿大社区健康调查-营养数据的建模研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Apr 15;27(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000545.
4
A Behaviorally Informed Mobile App to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Grocery Shopping (SwapSHOP): Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.行为信息学指导的移动应用改善食品杂货购物的营养质量(SwapSHOP):可行性随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 11;12:e45854. doi: 10.2196/45854.
5
New Zealand household purchases of sugar-sweetened, artificially sweetened, and unsweetened beverages: 2015-2019.新西兰家庭购买的含糖、人工甜味和无甜味饮料:2015-2019 年。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec 20;27(1):e22. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002793.
6
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:一项对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 5;13(12):e077059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077059.
7
RETRACTION: Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.撤回声明:英国家庭购买软饮料的变化与英国软饮料行业税的关联:对照中断时间序列分析
BMJ. 2023 Dec 5;383:p2705. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2705.
8
Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.德国含糖饮料征税对健康和经济的预估影响:交叉验证模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 21;20(11):e1004311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Building upon the sugar beverage tax in Mexico: a modelling study of tax alternatives to increase benefits.在墨西哥征收含糖饮料税的基础上:增加税收以提高效益的替代方案建模研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012227.
10
Representational shifts: increasing motivation for bottled water through simulation-enhancing advertisements.代表性转变:通过模拟增强广告提高对瓶装水的购买动机。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):2209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17109-1.
The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.
英国软饮料行业征税对制造商国内营业额的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100866. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
An analysis of the stock market reaction to the announcements of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy.对英国软饮料行业征税公告对股市反应的分析。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100834. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018.2015 年至 2018 年期间,英国软饮料中的糖销售量减少。
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1477-4.
7
Impact of an excise tax on the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in young people living in poorer neighbourhoods of Catalonia, Spain: a difference in differences study.西班牙加泰罗尼亚贫困社区年轻人中含糖饮料消费税对消费的影响:一项差分研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1553. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7908-5.
8
Potential impact on prevalence of obesity in the UK of a 20% price increase in high sugar snacks: modelling study.英国高糖零食价格上涨 20%对肥胖患病率的潜在影响:建模研究。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 4;366:l4786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4786.
9
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.费城饮料税对成年人和儿童购买和消费的影响。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: Evidence from South Africa's Health Promotion Levy.含糖饮料税和饮料价格:来自南非健康促进税的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112465. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112465. Epub 2019 Jul 31.