Salem Ahmed M, Harris Daniel, Bray Jonathan J H, Obaid Daniel R, Stephens Jeffrey W, Halcox Julian
Cardiology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, United Kingdom; Institute of Life Sciences-2, Swansea University Medical School, United Kingdom.
Cardiology Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, United Kingdom; Institute of Life Sciences-2, Swansea University Medical School, United Kingdom.
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;377:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
To assess compliance with European Society of Cardiology (ESC) secondary prevention recommendations in a nationwide contemporary population with diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease.
We conducted a retrospective observational study using linked health data in patients across Wales with DM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (2012-2017). The follow-up was for one year. We analysed the clinical characteristics, medications, target levels for HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and blood pressure against the ESC prevention guidelines.
Overall, 3478 patients with diabetes had available data at 1-year post-PCI. Only 43% had HbA1c levels <53 mmol/L, but 81% had blood pressure < 140/80 (current ESC targets). Prescribing frequency of the newer hypoglycaemic agents (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors) was suboptimal, with a higher rate in patients with HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol. Only 51% & 27% of the patients had LDL-C levels <1.8 &1.4 mmol/L (2016 & 2019 guidelines recommendations respectively), and 55% & 34% had non-HDL-C levels <2.6 & 2.2 mmol/L (2016 & 2019 guidelines respectively). Of the uncontrolled LDL-C patients, 42% (2016 target) and 35% (2019 target) were prescribed high-intensity statins. Females were more likely to have LDL-C targets above the recommended level.
Achievement of ESC treatment goals in this very-high risk cohort for DM and hyperlipidaemia was far from optimal, with a low prescription rate of the guidelines-recommended therapy. Target goals for hypertension were met more frequently. An up-to-date analysis reflecting the current practice against the most recent guidelines is warranted.
评估在全国范围内患有糖尿病(DM)和冠状动脉疾病的当代人群中,对欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)二级预防建议的依从性。
我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,利用威尔士接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(2012 - 2017年)的糖尿病患者的关联健康数据。随访为期一年。我们对照ESC预防指南分析了临床特征、药物治疗、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)和血压的目标水平。
总体而言,3478例糖尿病患者在PCI术后1年有可用数据。只有43%的患者HbA1c水平<53 mmol/L,但81%的患者血压<140/80(当前ESC目标)。新型降糖药物(胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂)的处方频率不理想,HbA1c≥53 mmol/mol的患者中该频率较高。分别只有51%和27%的患者LDL-C水平<1.8和1.4 mmol/L(分别为2016年和2019年指南建议),55%和34%的患者non-HDL-C水平<2.6和2.2 mmol/L(分别为2016年和2019年指南)。在LDL-C未达标的患者中,42%(2016年目标)和35%(2019年目标)的患者接受了高强度他汀类药物治疗。女性更有可能使LDL-C目标高于推荐水平。
在这个糖尿病和高脂血症的极高风险队列中,ESC治疗目标的达成远未达到最佳状态,指南推荐治疗的处方率较低。高血压的目标更常得以实现。有必要进行一项反映当前实践与最新指南对比的最新分析。