Caleça Telma, Ribeiro Pedro, Vitorino Marina, Menezes Maria, Sampaio-Alves Mafalda, Mendes Ana Duarte, Vicente Rodrigo, Negreiros Ida, Faria Ana, Costa Diogo Alpuim
Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, 2720-276 Amadora, Portugal.
Laboratory Medicine Centre Germano de Sousa, 1600-513 Lisbon, Portugal.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;15(3):594. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030594.
In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the "16S rRNA" gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called 'GutHealth_DB'. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 ( = 0.28 × 10 for the Chao index and = 1.64 × 10 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups ( = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA ( = 9.99 × 10) and Anosim ( = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion ( = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.
在这首次分析中,对23名乳腺癌幸存者(第1组)和291名健康女性对照者(第2组)的样本,通过编码各细菌“16S rRNA”基因的V3和V4区域进行了特征分析。样本通过下一代测序(NGS)进行测序,并借助Kraken2进行分类鉴定,然后使用名为“GutHealth_DB”的精选数据库通过Bracken进行改进。采用α和β多样性分析来确定肠道微生物群的丰富度和均匀度。应用非参数曼 - 惠特尼检验来评估两组之间的差异丰度。使用克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯卡方检验计算厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门(F/B)比率。第1组的α多样性显著更高(Chao指数为 = 0.28×10,ACE指数为 = 1.64×10)。作为丰富度和均匀度指标的香农指数在两组之间无统计学差异( = 0.72)。两组之间的微生物群组成不同:使用加权Unifrac距离,PERMANOVA( = 9.99×10)和Anosim( = 0.04)的零假设被拒绝,而β离散度的零假设未被拒绝( = 0.158)。两组之间14个门、29个纲、25个目、64个科、116个属和74个种的相对丰度存在显著差异。第1组的F/B比率显著低于第2组, < 0.001。我们的研究通过测试乳腺癌幸存者与健康对照者之间的差异,使我们能够观察到两组之间显著的分类学差异。需要进一步的研究来阐明其中涉及的机制,并探索微生物群与乳腺癌生存之间的关系。