Ghemiș Diana M, Marcu Loredana G
Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
MedEuropa, 410191 Oradea, Romania.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;15(3):678. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030678.
This study aimed to compare the dosimetric results of flattening filter-free (FFF) vs. flattened (FF) treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), with the goal to highlight potential advantages of FFF beams.
A group of 18 patients with brain metastases treated with fSRT (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions) were included. The dosimetric parameters evaluated were: (1) physical dosimetric parameters (number of monitor units (MUs), conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), beam on time (BOT)); (2) clinical dosimetric parameters pertaining to target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Two treatment plans were performed for all patients: one used 6 MV FFF beams and the other used 6 MV flattened beams.
A slight increase in MUs was observed for the FFF mode (+23.3 MUs). The CI showed a difference of -2.7% for the FF plans ( = 0.28), correlated with a poorer coverage of the PTV. DGI values reported in terms of PTV are in line with international recommendations and showed a +1.9% difference for FFF plans. An average BOT of 90.3 s was reported for FFF plans, which was 2.3 times shorter than that required for FF plans delivery ( ≤ 0.001). A slight decrease of PTV coverage (-1.26%, = 0.036) for FF plans can be considered relevant, but no other significant differences were observed between the two optimizations. No statistically significant benefit of using FFF beams to reduce V for normal brain could be demonstrated.
These dosimetric results encourage the implementation of fSRT with standard flattened beams in centers where FFF linacs are not available.
本研究旨在比较用于分次立体定向放射治疗(fSRT)的无均整器(FFF)与有均整器(FF)治疗计划的剂量学结果,以突出FFF射束的潜在优势。
纳入一组18例接受fSRT治疗(5次分割给予30 Gy)的脑转移瘤患者。评估的剂量学参数包括:(1)物理剂量学参数(监测单位数量(MUs)、适形指数(CI)、剂量梯度指数(DGI)、射束开启时间(BOT));(2)与靶区体积(PTV)和危及器官(OARs)相关的临床剂量学参数。为所有患者制定了两个治疗计划:一个使用6 MV FFF射束,另一个使用6 MV有均整器射束。
观察到FFF模式下MUs略有增加(增加23.3 MUs)。CI显示FF计划有-2.7%的差异( = 0.28),这与PTV覆盖较差相关。以PTV表示的DGI值符合国际建议,FFF计划显示有+1.9%的差异。FFF计划的平均BOT为90.3秒,比FF计划所需的时间短2.3倍( ≤ 0.001)。FF计划的PTV覆盖略有下降(-1.