Wu Junxiang, Song Hongchang, Li Jie, Tang Bin, Wu Fan
Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Department of Oncology, Xichang People's Hospital, Xichang, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1108142. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1108142. eCollection 2023.
The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams is becoming more prevalent in lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim in this study was to assess the impact of dosimetric and radiobiological differences between FFF and flattening filter (FF) beams for lung SBRT based on the target volume.
A total of 198 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans with FFF beams and FF beams were retrospectively selected for this study. For all plans, the prescribed dose was 50 Gy/5 fractions, and the dose volume histogram (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung were recorded and compared. Moreover, monitor units (MUs), the beam on-time and the treatment time were evaluated.
The study was performed following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 and 0915 protocols. No significant differences in D, coverage rate (CR) or conformity index (CI) of the target were observed between FFF beams and FF beams (>0.05). The D, R and gradient index (GI) for the target improved with FFF beams compared with FF beams (<0.05). FFF beams also significantly reduced the dose for the lung, heart, spinal cord, esophagus and NTCP of the lung (<0.05), compared with FF beams. However, there was no significant difference in sparing of the trachea (>0.05). The mean MUs, beam on-time and treatment time were 1871 ± 278 MUs, 3.2 ± 0.2 min and 3.9 ± 0.3 min for FFF beams, and 1890 ± 260 MUs, 4.2 ± 0.3 min and 4.8 ± 0.4 min for FF beams, respectively.
The FFF beam technique for lung SBRT with VMAT results in a better dose fall-off, better dose-sparing of OAR, lower NTCP of the lung and a shorter beam on-time compared with the FF beam technique. Additionally, the improvement in target and OAR-sparing for FFF beams was increased with increasing target volume.
在肺癌立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)中,使用容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)结合无 flattening 滤过器(FFF)射线束的情况越来越普遍。本研究的目的是基于靶区体积评估 FFF 射线束和平坦滤过器(FF)射线束在肺 SBRT 中剂量学和放射生物学差异的影响。
本研究回顾性选取了 198 个采用 FFF 射线束和 FF 射线束的肺立体定向体部放射治疗计划。对于所有计划,处方剂量为 50 Gy/5 次分割,记录并比较靶区和危及器官(OAR)的剂量体积直方图(DVH)以及肺的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。此外,评估了监测单位(MU)、射束开启时间和治疗时间。
本研究按照放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)0813 和 0915 方案进行。FFF 射线束和 FF 射线束在靶区的 D、覆盖率(CR)或适形指数(CI)方面未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。与 FF 射线束相比,FFF 射线束使靶区的 D、R 和梯度指数(GI)得到改善(<0.05)。与 FF 射线束相比,FFF 射线束还显著降低了肺、心脏、脊髓、食管的剂量以及肺的 NTCP(<0.05)。然而,在气管的剂量 sparing 方面没有显著差异(>0.05)。FFF 射线束的平均 MU、射束开启时间和治疗时间分别为 1871±278 MU、3.2±0.2 分钟和 3.9±0.3 分钟,FF 射线束分别为 1890±260 MU、4.2±0.3 分钟和 4.8±0.4 分钟。
与 FF 射线束技术相比,采用 VMAT 的肺 SBRT 的 FFF 射线束技术可实现更好的剂量跌落、更好的 OAR 剂量 sparing、更低的肺 NTCP 以及更短的射束开启时间。此外,随着靶区体积的增加,FFF 射线束在靶区和 OAR sparing 方面的改善更为明显。