• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种结合四种生物标志物的即时粪便检测可避免正常结肠镜检查,并优先处理有高风险的有症状结直肠癌患者。

A Point-of-Care Faecal Test Combining Four Biomarkers Allows Avoidance of Normal Colonoscopies and Prioritizes Symptomatic Patients with a High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Hijos-Mallada Gonzalo, Saura Nuria, Lué Alberto, Velamazan Raúl, Nieto Rocío, Navarro Mercedes, Arechavaleta Samantha, Chueca Eduardo, Gomollon Fernando, Lanas Angel, Sostres Carlos

机构信息

Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):721. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030721.

DOI:10.3390/cancers15030721
PMID:36765678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9913693/
Abstract

Most colonoscopies performed to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms detect only non-relevant pathologies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a qualitative point-of-care (POC) test combining four biomarkers (haemoglobin, transferrin, calprotectin, and lactoferrin), a quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin, and a quantitative faecal calprotectin (FC) test in symptomatic patients prospectively recruited. Colorectal cancer (CRC), adenoma requiring surveillance, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), microscopic colitis, and angiodysplasia were considered significant pathologies. A total of 571 patients were included. Significant pathology was diagnosed in 118 (20.7%), including 30 CRC cases (5.3%). The POC test yielded the highest negative predictive values: 94.8% for a significant pathology and 100% for CRC or IBD if the four markers turned negative (36.8% of the patients). Negative predictive values of FIT, FC, and its combination for diagnosis of a significant pathology were 88.4%, 87.6%, and 90.8%, respectively. Moreover, the positive predictive value using the POC test was 82.3% for significant pathology when all biomarkers tested positive (6% of the patients), with 70.6% of these patients diagnosed with CRC or IBD. The AUC of the POC test was 0.801 (95%CI 0.754-0.848) for the diagnosis of a significant pathology. Therefore, this POC faecal test allows the avoidance of unnecessary colonoscopies and prioritizes high risk symptomatic patients.

摘要

大多数为评估胃肠道症状而进行的结肠镜检查仅发现不相关的病变。我们旨在评估一种定性即时检验(POC)联合四种生物标志物(血红蛋白、转铁蛋白、钙卫蛋白和乳铁蛋白)、一种用于血红蛋白的定量粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)以及一种定量粪便钙卫蛋白(FC)检验在对前瞻性招募的有症状患者中的诊断准确性。结直肠癌(CRC)、需要监测的腺瘤、炎症性肠病(IBD)、显微镜下结肠炎和血管发育异常被视为重大病变。共纳入571例患者。118例(20.7%)被诊断为重大病变,包括30例CRC病例(5.3%)。POC检验产生了最高的阴性预测值:如果四种标志物均为阴性(36.8%的患者),重大病变的阴性预测值为94.8%,CRC或IBD的阴性预测值为100%。FIT、FC及其联合用于诊断重大病变的阴性预测值分别为88.4%、87.6%和90.8%。此外,当所有生物标志物检测均为阳性时(6%的患者),使用POC检验对重大病变的阳性预测值为82.3%,其中70.6%的患者被诊断为CRC或IBD。POC检验诊断重大病变的AUC为0.801(95%CI 0.754 - 0.848)。因此,这种POC粪便检验可避免不必要的结肠镜检查,并对高风险有症状患者进行优先排序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a2/9913693/f842ba97ec7c/cancers-15-00721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a2/9913693/01fd21f9f8ec/cancers-15-00721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a2/9913693/f842ba97ec7c/cancers-15-00721-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a2/9913693/01fd21f9f8ec/cancers-15-00721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a2/9913693/f842ba97ec7c/cancers-15-00721-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Point-of-Care Faecal Test Combining Four Biomarkers Allows Avoidance of Normal Colonoscopies and Prioritizes Symptomatic Patients with a High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.一种结合四种生物标志物的即时粪便检测可避免正常结肠镜检查,并优先处理有高风险的有症状结直肠癌患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):721. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030721.
2
The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology.定量粪便潜血试验和粪便钙卫蛋白联合检测是一种经济有效的策略,可避免对无相关病理的有症状患者进行结肠镜检查。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 May 18;13:1756284820920786. doi: 10.1177/1756284820920786. eCollection 2020.
3
Diagnosing colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease in primary care: The usefulness of tests for faecal haemoglobin, faecal calprotectin, anaemia and iron deficiency. A prospective study.基层医疗中结直肠癌和炎症性肠病的诊断:粪便血红蛋白、粪便钙卫蛋白、贫血及缺铁检测的效用。一项前瞻性研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;52(1):69-75. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1228120. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Is there an added value of faecal calprotectin and haemoglobin in the diagnostic work-up for primary care patients suspected of significant colorectal disease? A cross-sectional diagnostic study.对于疑似患有严重结直肠疾病的基层医疗患者,粪便钙卫蛋白和血红蛋白在诊断检查中是否具有附加价值?一项横断面诊断研究。
BMC Med. 2016 Sep 26;14(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0684-5.
5
The Addition of Other Fecal Biomarkers Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test Alone in a Colorrectal Cancer Screening Cohort.在结直肠癌筛查队列中,添加其他粪便生物标志物并不能提高单独免疫化学粪便潜血试验的诊断准确性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 4;8:665786. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.665786. eCollection 2021.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of faecal biomarkers in detecting colorectal cancer and adenoma in symptomatic patients.粪便生物标志物诊断检测症状性患者结直肠癌和腺瘤的准确性。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(2):354-363. doi: 10.1111/apt.13865. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.粪便血红蛋白可定义结直肠腺瘤性息肉患者在结直肠肿瘤筛查中风险。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Jun;8(5):559-566. doi: 10.1177/2050640620913674. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms.粪便血红蛋白和粪便钙卫蛋白作为肠道症状患者肠道疾病的指标,这些患者因肠道症状就诊于初级保健机构。
Gut. 2016 Sep;65(9):1463-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309579. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of one or two faecal haemoglobin and calprotectin measurements in patients with suspected colorectal cancer.疑似结直肠癌患者进行一两次粪便血红蛋白和钙卫蛋白检测的诊断准确性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;53(12):1526-1534. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1539761. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
10
Reduction of faecal immunochemical test false-positive results using a signature based on faecal bacterial markers.基于粪便细菌标志物的特征减少粪便免疫化学检测的假阳性结果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;49(11):1410-1420. doi: 10.1111/apt.15251. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on the diagnostic value of fecal calprotectin in colorectal tumors.粪便钙卫蛋白在结直肠肿瘤诊断价值中的研究进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1626197. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1626197. eCollection 2025.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compound analysis in detecting colorectal polyps: meta-analysis.粪便免疫化学检测和挥发性有机化合物分析在检测大肠息肉中的诊断准确性:荟萃分析
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae154.
3
The Diagnostic Utility of Biochemical Markers and Intestinal Ultrasound Compared with Endoscopy in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The usefulness of fecal hemoglobin and calprotectin tests in diagnosing significant bowel diseases: a prospective study.粪便血红蛋白和钙卫蛋白检测在诊断显著肠道疾病中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr;58(4):368-374. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2133551. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
2
Role of the faecal immunochemical test in patients with risk-stratified suspected colorectal cancer symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the ACPGBI/BSG guidelines.粪便免疫化学检测在具有风险分层的疑似结直肠癌症状患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析以指导英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科医师协会/英国胃肠病学会指南
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Oct 3;23:100518. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100518. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
与内镜检查相比,生化标志物和肠道超声在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者中的诊断效用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 21;13(11):3030. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113030.
4
The performance of FIT-based and other risk prediction models for colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients: a systematic review.有症状患者中基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)及其他结直肠肿瘤风险预测模型的性能:一项系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Sep 21;64:102204. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102204. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Patients With Gastrointestinal Conditions Consider Telehealth Equivalent to In-Person Care.
患有胃肠道疾病的患者认为远程医疗等同于面对面就诊。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jan;164(1):156-158.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.035. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
4
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer patients.2019冠状病毒病大流行对结直肠癌患者诊断和管理的影响。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 22;15:17562848221117636. doi: 10.1177/17562848221117636. eCollection 2022.
5
Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG).疑似结直肠癌(CRC)体征或症状患者的粪便免疫化学检测(FIT):英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI)与英国胃肠病学会(BSG)联合指南
Gut. 2022 Jul 12;71(10):1939-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327985.
6
Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies.当前和未来的结直肠癌筛查策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;19(8):521-531. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y. Epub 2022 May 3.
7
The role of faecal calprotectin in diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便钙卫蛋白在结直肠肿瘤诊断和分期中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02220-1.
8
Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: meta-analysis.粪便免疫化学试验对疑似结直肠癌症状患者的分诊:荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):182-190. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab411.
9
Comparison of the QuikRead go point-of-care faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin with the FOB Gold Wide laboratory analyser to diagnose colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients.比较 QuikRead go 即时护理粪便免疫化学试验血红蛋白与 FOB Gold Wide 实验室分析仪,以诊断有症状患者的结直肠癌。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Oct 25;60(1):101-108. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0655. Print 2022 Jan 26.
10
Faecal immunochemical test for suspected colorectal cancer symptoms: patient survey of usability and acceptability.针对疑似结直肠癌症状的粪便免疫化学检测:患者对可用性和可接受性的调查
BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0102. Print 2022 Mar.