Suppr超能文献

有症状患者中基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)及其他结直肠肿瘤风险预测模型的性能:一项系统评价

The performance of FIT-based and other risk prediction models for colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients: a systematic review.

作者信息

Hampton James S, Kenny Ryan P W, Rees Colin J, Hamilton William, Eastaugh Claire, Richmond Catherine, Sharp Linda

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Sep 21;64:102204. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102204. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are increasing internationally. Endoscopy services are under significant pressure with many overwhelmed. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has been advocated to identify a high-risk population of symptomatic patients requiring definitive investigation by colonoscopy. Combining FIT with other factors in a risk prediction model could further improve performance in identifying those requiring investigation most urgently. We systematically reviewed performance of models predicting risk of CRC and/or advanced colorectal polyps (ACP) in symptomatic patients, with a particular focus on those models including FIT.

METHODS

The review protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42022314710). Searches were conducted from database inception to April 2023 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane libraries, SCOPUS and CINAHL. Risk of bias of each study was assessed using The Prediction study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis based on the guidelines for Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis was performed due to study heterogeneity.

FINDINGS

We included 62 studies; 23 included FIT (n = 22) or guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Testing (n = 1) combined with one or more other variables. Twenty-one studies were conducted solely in primary care. Generally, prediction models including FIT consistently had good discriminatory ability for CRC/ACP (i.e. AUC >0.8) and performed better than models without FIT although some models without FIT also performed well. However, many studies did not present calibration and internal and external validation were limited. Two studies were rated as low risk of bias; neither model included FIT.

INTERPRETATION

Risk prediction models, including and not including FIT, show promise for identifying those most at risk of colorectal neoplasia. Substantial limitations in evidence remain, including heterogeneity, high risk of bias, and lack of external validation. Further evaluation in studies adhering to gold standard methodology, in appropriate populations, is required before widespread adoption in clinical practice.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA) Programme (Project number 133852).

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率都在上升。内镜检查服务面临巨大压力,许多地方不堪重负。粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)被提倡用于识别有症状患者中的高危人群,这些患者需要通过结肠镜检查进行明确诊断。在风险预测模型中将FIT与其他因素相结合,可能会进一步提高识别最急需检查患者的效能。我们系统回顾了预测有症状患者患CRC和/或进展期大肠息肉(ACP)风险的模型的效能,特别关注那些包含FIT的模型。

方法

该综述方案发表在PROSPERO(CRD42022314710)上。从数据库建立到2023年4月,在MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、SCOPUS和CINAHL中进行检索。使用预测研究偏倚风险评估工具评估每项研究的偏倚风险。由于研究的异质性,根据非Meta分析的综合指南进行叙述性综合分析。

结果

我们纳入了62项研究;23项研究将FIT(n = 22)或愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(n = 1)与一个或多个其他变量相结合。21项研究仅在初级保健机构开展。总体而言,包含FIT的预测模型对CRC/ACP始终具有良好的区分能力(即AUC>0.8),并且比不包含FIT的模型表现更好,尽管一些不包含FIT的模型也表现良好。然而,许多研究未呈现校准情况,内部和外部验证也很有限。两项研究被评为低偏倚风险;两个模型均未包含FIT。

解读

包括和不包括FIT的风险预测模型在识别结直肠肿瘤风险最高的人群方面显示出前景。证据仍存在重大局限性,包括异质性、高偏倚风险和缺乏外部验证。在临床实践中广泛应用之前,需要在适当人群中采用符合金标准方法的研究进行进一步评估。

资助

英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)[卫生技术评估计划(HTA)计划(项目编号133852)]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d782/10541467/1b7f04cb9d08/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验