Praud Delphine, Deygas Floriane, Amadou Amina, Bouilly Maryline, Turati Federica, Bravi Francesca, Xu Tingting, Grassot Lény, Coudon Thomas, Fervers Béatrice
Prevention Cancer Environment Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France.
Inserm, U1296 Unit, "Radiation: Defense, Health and Environment", Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;15(3):927. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030927.
Current evidence of an association of breast cancer (BC) risk with air pollution exposure, in particular from traffic exhaust, remains inconclusive, and the exposure assessment methodologies are heterogeneous. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) and BC incidence (PROSPERO CRD42021286774). We systematically reviewed observational studies assessing exposure to TRAP and BC risk published until June 2022, available on Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Studies using models for assessing exposure to traffic-related air pollutants or using exposure proxies (including traffic density, distance to road, etc.) were eligible for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis of studies investigating the association between NO/NO exposure and BC risk was conducted. Overall, 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included (seven case-control, one nested case-control, 13 cohort studies); 13 studies (five case-control, eight cohort) provided data for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Individual studies provided little evidence of an association between TRAP and BC risk; exposure assessment methods and time periods of traffic emissions were different. The meta-estimate on NO exposure indicated a positive association (pooled relative risk per 10 µg/m of NO: 1.015; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.003; 1.028). No association between NO exposure and BC was found (three studies). Although there was limited evidence of an association for TRAP estimated with proxies, the meta-analysis showed a significant association between NO exposure, a common TRAP pollutant marker, and BC risk, yet with a small effect size. Our findings provide additional support for air pollution carcinogenicity.
目前,关于乳腺癌(BC)风险与空气污染暴露,尤其是交通尾气暴露之间关联的证据仍不确凿,且暴露评估方法各异。本研究旨在对交通相关空气污染(TRAP)与BC发病率之间的关联进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO CRD42021286774)。我们系统评价了截至2022年6月发表的、可在Medline/PubMed和Web of Science数据库中获取的评估TRAP暴露与BC风险的观察性研究。使用模型评估交通相关空气污染物暴露或使用暴露替代指标(包括交通密度、距道路距离等)的研究符合纳入标准。对调查NO/NO₂暴露与BC风险之间关联的研究进行了随机效应荟萃分析。总体而言,纳入了21项符合纳入标准的研究(7项病例对照研究、1项巢式病例对照研究、13项队列研究);13项研究(5项病例对照研究、8项队列研究)提供了纳入荟萃分析的数据。个别研究几乎没有提供TRAP与BC风险之间存在关联的证据;暴露评估方法和交通排放的时间段各不相同。关于NO暴露的荟萃估计显示存在正相关(每10μg/m³ NO的合并相对风险:1.015;95%置信区间,CI:1.003;1.028)。未发现NO₂暴露与BC之间存在关联(3项研究)。尽管使用替代指标估计的TRAP存在关联的证据有限,但荟萃分析显示,常见的TRAP污染物标志物NO暴露与BC风险之间存在显著关联,不过效应量较小。我们的研究结果为空气污染致癌性提供了更多支持。