Bergaglio Chiara, Giasotto Veronica, Marcenaro Michela, Barra Salvina, Turazzi Marianna, Bauckneht Matteo, Casaleggio Alessandro, Sciabà Francesca, Terrone Carlo, Mantica Guglielmo, Borghesi Marco, Signori Alessio, Spina Bruno, Piol Nataniele, Zanardi Elisa, Fornarini Giuseppe, Zawaideh Jeries Paolo
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy.
Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(3):387. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030387.
treated prostate cancer (PCa) patients develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 27-53% of cases; the role of MRI in this setting is still controversial. In 2021 a panel of experts proposed a "Prostate Imaging-Recurrence Reporting" (PI-RR) score, aiming to standardize the reporting. The aim of our study is to evaluate the reproducibility of the PI-RR scoring system among readers with different expertise.
in this monocentric, retrospective observational study, the images of patients who underwent MRI with BCR from January 2017 to January 2022 were analyzed by two radiologists and a radiology resident. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were obtained. Interobserver agreement was calculated. The percentage of the PI-RR score of 3 was estimated to find out the proportion of uncertain exams reported among the readers.
a total of seventy-six patients were included in our study: eight previously treated with RT and sixty-eight who underwent surgery. The accuracy range was 75-80%, the sensitivity 68.4-71.1%, the specificity 81.6-89.5%, PPV 78.8-87.1%, and NPV 72.1-75.6%. The inter-reader agreement using a binary evaluation (PI-RR ≥ 3 as positive mpMRI) demonstrated a correlation coefficient (k) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87). The percentage for the PI-RR score of 3 was 6.6% for reader one, 14.5% for reader two, and 2.6% for reader three.
this study confirmed the good accuracy of mpMRI in the detection of local recurrence of PCa and the good reproducibility of PI-RR score among all readers, confirming it to be a promising tool for the standardization of the assessment of patients with BCR.
接受治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)患者中,27%-53%会出现生化复发(BCR);MRI在这种情况下的作用仍存在争议。2021年,一个专家小组提出了“前列腺影像-复发报告”(PI-RR)评分,旨在规范报告。我们研究的目的是评估PI-RR评分系统在不同专业水平读者中的可重复性。
在这项单中心回顾性观察研究中,两名放射科医生和一名放射科住院医师分析了2017年1月至2022年1月期间接受MRI检查且出现BCR的患者的图像。获得了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。计算了观察者间的一致性。估计PI-RR评分为3的百分比,以了解读者报告的不确定检查的比例。
我们的研究共纳入76例患者:8例先前接受过放疗,68例接受过手术。准确性范围为75%-80%,敏感性为68.4%-71.1%,特异性为81.6%-89.5%,PPV为78.8%-87.1%,NPV为72.1%-75.6%。使用二元评估(PI-RR≥3为阳性mpMRI)的读者间一致性显示相关系数(k)为0.74(95%CI:0.62-0.87)。读者一的PI-RR评分为3的百分比为6.6%,读者二为14.5%,读者三为2.6%。
本研究证实了mpMRI在检测PCa局部复发方面具有良好的准确性,且PI-RR评分在所有读者中具有良好的可重复性,证实其是评估BCR患者的标准化的有前景的工具。