Gelikman David G, Kenigsberg Alexander P, Mee Law Yan, Yilmaz Enis C, Harmon Stephanie A, Parikh Sahil H, Hyman Jason A, Huth Hannah, Koller Christopher R, Nethala Daniel, Hesswani Charles, Merino Maria J, Gurram Sandeep, Choyke Peter L, Wood Bradford J, Pinto Peter A, Turkbey Baris
Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Mar 4;62:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.012. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Focal therapy (FT) is increasingly recognized as a promising approach for managing localized prostate cancer (PCa), notably reducing treatment-related morbidities. However, post-treatment anatomical changes present significant challenges for surveillance using current imaging techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement and efficacy of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on post-FT multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who underwent primary FT for localized csPCa between 2013 and 2023, followed by post-FT mpMRI and a prostate biopsy. Two expert genitourinary radiologists retrospectively evaluated post-FT mpMRI using PI-FAB. The key measures included inter-reader agreement of PI-FAB scores, assessed by quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa (), and the system's efficacy in predicting in-field recurrence of csPCa, with a PI-FAB score cutoff of 3. Additional diagnostic metrics including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were also evaluated.
Scans from 38 patients were analyzed, revealing a moderate level of agreement in PI-FAB scoring ( = 0.56). Both radiologists achieved sensitivity of 93% in detecting csPCa, although specificity, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracy varied.
The PI-FAB scoring system exhibited high sensitivity with moderate inter-reader agreement in detecting in-field recurrence of csPCa. Despite promising results, its low specificity and PPV necessitate further refinement. These findings underscore the need for larger studies to validate the clinical utility of PI-FAB, potentially aiding in standardizing post-treatment surveillance.
Focal therapy has emerged as a promising approach for managing localized prostate cancer, but limitations in current imaging techniques present significant challenges for post-treatment surveillance. The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system showed high sensitivity for detecting in-field recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer. However, its low specificity and positive predictive value necessitate further refinement. Larger, more comprehensive studies are needed to fully validate its clinical utility.
聚焦治疗(FT)越来越被认为是一种治疗局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的有前景的方法,尤其能显著降低治疗相关的发病率。然而,治疗后的解剖结构变化给使用当前成像技术进行监测带来了重大挑战。本研究旨在评估聚焦消融后前列腺成像(PI-FAB)评分系统在FT后多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)上检测临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)时的阅片者间一致性和效能。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2013年至2023年间因局限性csPCa接受初次FT治疗,随后接受FT后mpMRI检查和前列腺活检的患者。两名泌尿生殖系统放射学专家使用PI-FAB对FT后mpMRI进行回顾性评估。关键指标包括PI-FAB评分的阅片者间一致性,采用二次加权科恩kappa系数()评估,以及该系统预测csPCa野内复发的效能,PI-FAB评分临界值为3。还评估了其他诊断指标,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性。
分析了38例患者的扫描结果,显示PI-FAB评分的一致性处于中等水平(=0.56)。两位放射科医生在检测csPCa时的敏感性均达到93%,尽管特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性有所不同。
PI-FAB评分系统在检测csPCa野内复发时表现出高敏感性和中等阅片者间一致性。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但其低特异性和PPV需要进一步完善。这些发现强调需要进行更大规模的研究来验证PI-FAB的临床实用性,这可能有助于规范治疗后监测。
聚焦治疗已成为治疗局限性前列腺癌的一种有前景的方法,但当前成像技术的局限性给治疗后监测带来了重大挑战。聚焦消融后前列腺成像(PI-FAB)评分系统在检测临床显著前列腺癌野内复发方面显示出高敏感性。然而,其低特异性和阳性预测值需要进一步完善。需要更大规模、更全面的研究来充分验证其临床实用性。