Syrgiamiotis Charilaos, Krekoukias Georgios, Gkouzioti Katerina, Hebron Clair
Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne BN20 7UR, UK.
Laboratory of Advanced Physiotherapy, Physiotherapy Department, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica (UNIWA), 12243 Athens, Greece.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;13(3):544. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030544.
Physiotherapists commonly use mobilizations for treating patients with thoracic spine pain (TSP). There is evidence to suggest that spinal mobilizations can decrease pain. Different doses of mobilization treatment are applied, however there is a paucity of evidence on the influence of these dosage parameters. The effect of different forces of treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in the hypoalgesic effect of high and low force thoracic mobilizations. This single-blinded, randomized, within-subject, repeated measures, cross-over design recruited 28 asymptomatic participants. Participants received the experimental conditions of high (200 N) and low force (30 N) mobilizations to T6 at least 48 h apart. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were measured before and immediately after each experimental intervention at three different standardized sites. The results demonstrated that high force thoracic mobilizations caused a significant increase in PPT measures compared to low force mobilizations. This effect was detected at all PPT sites. This study suggests that high force thoracic PA mobilizations cause a significantly greater hypoalgesic response in asymptomatic participants than low force thoracic mobilizations. The hypoalgesic response seems to be elicited not only locally at the site of the intervention, but in a widespread manner.
物理治疗师通常使用松动术来治疗胸椎疼痛(TSP)患者。有证据表明脊柱松动术可以减轻疼痛。虽然应用了不同剂量的松动术治疗,但关于这些剂量参数的影响的证据却很少。不同治疗力度的效果仍然未知。本研究旨在调查高力度和低力度胸椎松动术的痛觉减退效果是否存在差异。这项单盲、随机、受试者内重复测量的交叉设计招募了28名无症状参与者。参与者接受高力度(200 N)和低力度(30 N)对T6的松动术实验条件,间隔至少48小时。在每次实验干预前和干预后立即在三个不同的标准化部位测量压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)。结果表明,与低力度松动术相比,高力度胸椎松动术使PPT测量值显著增加。在所有PPT测量部位均检测到这种效果。本研究表明,在无症状参与者中,高力度胸椎后关节松动术比低力度胸椎松动术引起的痛觉减退反应明显更大。痛觉减退反应似乎不仅在干预部位局部引发,而且是以广泛的方式引发。