Millan Mario, Leboeuf-Yde Charlotte, Budgell Brian, Amorim Michel-Ange
EA 4532 CIAMS, UFR STAPS, University Paris-Sud, Paris, France.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Aug 10;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-26.
Although there is evidence that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) can reduce pain, the mechanisms involved are not well established. There is a need to review the scientific literature to establish the evidence-base for the reduction of pain following SMT.
To determine if SMT can reduce experimentally induced pain, and if so, if the effect is i) only at the level of the treated spinal segment, ii) broader but in the same general region as SMT is performed, or iii) systemic.
A systematic critical literature review.
A systematic search was performed for experimental studies on healthy volunteers and people without chronic syndromes, in which the immediate effect of SMT was tested. Articles selected were reviewed blindly by two authors. A summary quality score was calculated to indicate level of manuscript quality. Outcome was considered positive if the pain-reducing effect was statistically significant. Separate evidence tables were constructed with information relevant to each research question. Results were interpreted taking into account their manuscript quality.
Twenty-two articles were included, describing 43 experiments, primarily on pain produced by pressure (n = 27) or temperature (n = 9). Their quality was generally moderate. A hypoalgesic effect was shown in 19/27 experiments on pressure pain, produced by pressure in 3/9 on pain produced by temperature and in 6/7 tests on pain induced by other measures. Second pain provoked by temperature seems to respond to SMT but not first pain. Most studies revealed a local or regional hypoalgesic effect whereas a systematic effect was unclear. Manipulation of a "restricted motion segment" ("manipulable lesion") seemed not to be essential to analgesia. In relation to outcome, there was no discernible difference between studies with higher vs. lower quality scores.
These results indicate that SMT has a direct local/regional hypoalgesic effect on experimental pain for some types of stimuli. Further research is needed to determine i) if there is also a systemic effect, ii) the exact mechanisms by which SMT attenuates pain, and iii) whether this response is clinically significant.
尽管有证据表明脊柱推拿疗法(SMT)可减轻疼痛,但其中涉及的机制尚未完全明确。有必要回顾科学文献以确立SMT后疼痛减轻的证据基础。
确定SMT是否能减轻实验性诱发的疼痛,若能减轻,其效果是:i)仅在接受治疗的脊柱节段水平;ii)更广泛但在与进行SMT相同的大致区域;或iii)全身性的。
系统的批判性文献综述。
对关于健康志愿者和无慢性综合征人群的实验研究进行系统检索,其中测试了SMT的即时效果。由两位作者对所选文章进行盲审。计算总结质量得分以表明手稿质量水平。如果疼痛减轻效果具有统计学意义,则结果被视为阳性。构建单独的证据表,其中包含与每个研究问题相关的信息。结合手稿质量对结果进行解释。
纳入22篇文章,描述了43项实验,主要针对由压力(n = 27)或温度(n = 9)产生的疼痛。其质量总体中等。在19/27项关于压力疼痛的实验中显示出痛觉减退效应,在3/9项关于温度产生的疼痛实验中由压力产生,在6/7项关于其他措施诱发的疼痛测试中也有此效应。温度诱发的继发性疼痛似乎对SMT有反应,但原发性疼痛无反应。大多数研究显示局部或区域痛觉减退效应,而全身性效应尚不清楚。对“活动受限节段”(“可推拿病变”)的推拿似乎对镇痛并非必不可少。就结果而言,质量得分较高与较低的研究之间没有明显差异。
这些结果表明,对于某些类型的刺激,SMT对实验性疼痛具有直接的局部/区域痛觉减退效应。需要进一步研究以确定:i)是否也存在全身性效应;ii)SMT减轻疼痛的确切机制;iii)这种反应在临床上是否具有重要意义。