• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者使用造口袋全环过滤器的性能和认知——两项随机交叉试验

Evaluating the Performance and Perception of a Stoma Bag Full-Circle Filter in People with a Colostomy or an Ileostomy-Two Randomized Crossover Trials.

作者信息

Virgin-Elliston Tracey, Nonboe Pernille, Boisen Esben Bo, Koblauch Henrik

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London SW10 9NH, UK.

Coloplast A/S, Holtedam 1-3, DK-3050 Humlebæk, Denmark.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(3):369. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030369.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11030369
PMID:36766947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914626/
Abstract

Stoma bag filter-related issues, such as ballooning (the bag filling with gas), remain highly prevalent among users. The full-circle filter was purposely designed to reduce ballooning through the inclusion of a unique, full-circle pre-filter. Two similar randomized crossover trials were conducted to compare the performance of the full-circle filter with a dual filter in adults with a colostomy (n = 20) or an ileostomy (n = 20). The frequency of ballooning was significantly lower with the full-circle filter versus the dual filter in participants with a colostomy ( < 0.0007) and in participants with an ileostomy ( < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of other issues (pancaking, odor problems, and ostomy solution discretion) between the filters. On average, participants with an ileostomy wore ostomy solutions with the full-circle filter for 3.3 h longer than ostomy solutions with the dual filter ( < 0.0001); wear-time in users with a colostomy was comparable between the filters. Considering the lack of published research on stoma bag filters and the high prevalence of filter-related issues, these data provide important information for health care practitioners who support people living with a stoma.

摘要

造口袋过滤器相关问题,如膨胀(袋子充满气体),在使用者中仍然非常普遍。全环过滤器特意设计通过包含独特的全环预过滤器来减少膨胀。进行了两项类似的随机交叉试验,以比较全环过滤器与双过滤器在结肠造口术成人(n = 20)或回肠造口术成人(n = 20)中的性能。在结肠造口术参与者中(< 0.0007)以及在回肠造口术参与者中(< 0.0001),使用全环过滤器时膨胀的频率明显低于使用双过滤器时。在过滤器之间,其他问题(压扁、气味问题和造口溶液渗漏)的频率未观察到显著差异。平均而言,回肠造口术参与者使用全环过滤器佩戴造口用品的时间比使用双过滤器时长3.3小时(< 0.0001);结肠造口术使用者中两种过滤器的佩戴时间相当。鉴于缺乏关于造口袋过滤器的已发表研究以及过滤器相关问题的高发生率,这些数据为支持造口患者的医护人员提供了重要信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/2d522b99a51c/healthcare-11-00369-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/de7a51a7ca59/healthcare-11-00369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/9cb1b0f94afc/healthcare-11-00369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/bc030eae62a6/healthcare-11-00369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/f04ac0bbd3ba/healthcare-11-00369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/2d522b99a51c/healthcare-11-00369-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/de7a51a7ca59/healthcare-11-00369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/9cb1b0f94afc/healthcare-11-00369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/bc030eae62a6/healthcare-11-00369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/f04ac0bbd3ba/healthcare-11-00369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a2/9914626/2d522b99a51c/healthcare-11-00369-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Performance and Perception of a Stoma Bag Full-Circle Filter in People with a Colostomy or an Ileostomy-Two Randomized Crossover Trials.评估结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者使用造口袋全环过滤器的性能和认知——两项随机交叉试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(3):369. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030369.
2
Ostomy bag management: comparative study of a new one-piece closed bag.造口袋管理:新型一体式封闭造口袋的对比研究
Br J Nurs. 2007;16(2):95-6, 98-101. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.2.22767.
3
Considering the benefits of a new stoma appliance: a clinical trial.新型造口器具的益处研究:一项临床试验
Br J Nurs. 2015 Dec 10;24(22):S12, S14-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup22.S12.
4
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study.巴西结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者造口生活质量问卷的跨文化适应与验证:一项横断面研究
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 May;63(5):34-41.
5
The Prevalence of Ostomy-related Complications 1 Year After Ostomy Surgery: A Prospective, Descriptive, Clinical Study.造口术后1年造口相关并发症的发生率:一项前瞻性、描述性临床研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Oct;62(10):34-48.
6
Perception of leakage: data from the Ostomy Life Study 2019.渗漏感知:2019 年造口生活研究的数据。
Br J Nurs. 2021 Dec 9;30(22):S4-S12. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.22.S4.
7
Preoperative stoma site marking for fecal diversions (ileostomy and colostomy): position statement of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada.术前造口定位用于粪便转流(回肠造口术和结肠造口术):加拿大结直肠外科医师学会和加拿大伤口、造口和失禁护理护士协会的立场声明。
Can J Surg. 2022 May 25;65(3):E359-E363. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022320. Print 2022 May-Jun.
8
A comparative study of two-piece ostomy appliances.两件式造口器具的比较研究。
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(9):530, 532, 534 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.9.42255.
9
Intestinal diversion (colostomy or ileostomy) in patients with severe bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后出现严重肠道功能障碍患者的肠道改道(结肠造口术或回肠造口术)
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Mar-Apr;35(2):159-66. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000313638.29623.40.
10
Correlating the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Score and the SF-36 to a proposed Ostomy Function Index in patients with a stoma.将粪便失禁生活质量评分和SF-36与拟议的造口术功能指数在造口患者中进行相关性分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Dec;52(12):68-74.

本文引用的文献

1
Sleep Quality and Factors Affecting Sleep in Individuals With an Intestinal Ostomy: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.肠造口患者的睡眠质量及影响因素:一项描述性横断面研究。
Wound Manag Prev. 2022 May;68(5):28-36. doi: 10.25270/wmp.2022.5.2836.
2
Predicting life with a permanent end colostomy: A prospective study on function, bother and acceptance.预测永久性末端回肠造口患者的生活:一项关于功能、困扰和接受度的前瞻性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2681-2689. doi: 10.1111/codi.15842. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
Fool's gold? Why blinded trials are not always best.
愚人金?为何盲法试验并非总是最佳选择。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 21;368:l6228. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6228.
4
Factors influencing health-related quality of life of those in the Netherlands living with an ostomy.
Br J Nurs. 2019 Dec 12;28(22):S10-S17. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.22.S10.
5
International Consensus Results: Development of Practice Guidelines for Assessment of Peristomal Body and Stoma Profiles, Patient Engagement, and Patient Follow-up.国际共识结果:制定评估造口周围身体和造口轮廓、患者参与和患者随访的实践指南。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 Nov/Dec;46(6):497-504. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000599.
6
Ongoing ostomy self-care challenges of long-term rectal cancer survivors.长期直肠癌幸存者的造口自我护理持续挑战。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3933-3939. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4268-0. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Research priorities about stoma-related quality of life from the perspective of people with a stoma: A pilot survey.造口相关生活质量研究重点:基于造口患者视角的初步调查。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1421-1427. doi: 10.1111/hex.12585. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.造口术问卷(Ostomy-Q):一种评估与造口器具相关结果的工具的开发及心理测量学验证
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(1):12-22.
9
JAMA PATIENT PAGE. Stomas.
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):2032. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0202.
10
Ostomy-related problems and their impact on quality of life of colorectal cancer ostomates: a systematic review.造口相关问题及其对结直肠癌造口患者生活质量的影响:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1050-3. Epub 2015 Jun 30.