• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

造口术问卷(Ostomy-Q):一种评估与造口器具相关结果的工具的开发及心理测量学验证

The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.

作者信息

Nafees Beenish, Rasmussen Mikkel, LLoyd Andrew

机构信息

ICON plc, UK.

Coloplast A/S, Denmark.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(1):12-22.

PMID:28112646
Abstract

Using an ostomy appliance can affect many aspects of a person's health-related quality of life (HRQL). A 2-part, descrip- tive study was designed to develop and validate an instrument to assess quality-of-life outcomes related to ostomy ap- pliance use. Study inclusion/exclusion criteria stipulated participants should be 18 to 85 years of age, have an ileostomy or colostomy, used an appliance for a minimum of 3 months without assistance, and able to complete an online survey. All participants provided sociodemographic and clinical information. In phase 1, a literature search was conducted and existing instruments used to measure HRQL in persons with an ostomy were assessed. Subsequently, the Ostomy-Q, a 23-item, Likert-response type questionnaire, divided into 4 domains (Discreetness, Comfort, Confidence, and Social Life), was developed based on published evidence and existing ostomy-related HRQL tools. Seven (7) participants re- cruited from a manufacturer user panel took part in exploratory/cognitive qualitative interviews to refine the new quality- of-life questionnaire. In phase 2, the instrument was tested to assess item variability and conceptual structure, item-total correlation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity, and minimal important difference (MID) in an online validation study among 200 participants from the manufacturer's user panel (equally divided by gender, 125 [62.5%] >50 years old, 128 [64%] with an ileostomy). This exercise also included completion of the Stoma Quality of Life Question- naire and 2 domains from the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 to assess convergent validity. Eighty-two (82) participants recompleted these study instruments 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. Sociodemographic and clinical data were assessed using descriptive statistics; Cronbach's alpha was used for internal consistency (minimum 0.70), principle component analysis for item variability/conceptual structure, and item-total correlation; intraclass correlation coefficient was used for test-retest reliability; and standard error of measurement was applied to MID. All domains demonstrated good internal consistency (between 0.69 and 0.78). All scales showed stability, with a minimum intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.743 (P <.001). The Ostomy-Q showed good convergent validity with other instruments to which it was compared (P <.01). In this study, the Ostomy-Q was found to be a reliable and valid outcome measure that can enhance understanding of the impact of ostomy appliances on users. Some items for social relationships and discreetness may need more exploring in the future with other patient groups.

摘要

使用造口器具会影响一个人健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的多个方面。一项分为两部分的描述性研究旨在开发并验证一种工具,以评估与使用造口器具相关的生活质量结果。研究纳入/排除标准规定,参与者年龄应在18至85岁之间,有回肠造口术或结肠造口术,在无协助的情况下使用器具至少3个月,并且能够完成在线调查。所有参与者均提供了社会人口统计学和临床信息。在第一阶段,进行了文献检索,并评估了用于测量造口术患者HRQL的现有工具。随后,基于已发表的证据和现有的与造口相关的HRQL工具,开发了Ostomy-Q,这是一份包含23个条目的李克特式问卷,分为4个领域(隐秘性、舒适度、自信心和社交生活)。从制造商用户面板招募的7名参与者参加了探索性/认知性定性访谈,以完善新的生活质量问卷。在第二阶段,在制造商用户面板的200名参与者(按性别平均分配,125名[62.5%]年龄>50岁,128名[64%]有回肠造口术)中进行了一项在线验证研究,以测试该工具的项目变异性和概念结构、项目与总分的相关性、内部一致性、重测信度、敏感性和最小重要差异(MID)。这项工作还包括完成造口生活质量问卷以及Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23中的2个领域,以评估收敛效度。82名参与者在2周后重新完成了这些研究工具,以评估重测信度。使用描述性统计评估社会人口统计学和临床数据;使用Cronbach's alpha评估内部一致性(最小值为0.70),使用主成分分析评估项目变异性/概念结构以及项目与总分的相关性;使用组内相关系数评估重测信度;并将测量标准误应用于MID。所有领域均显示出良好的内部一致性(在0.69至0.78之间)。所有量表均显示出稳定性,组内相关系数最小值为0.743(P<.001)。与其他被比较的工具相比,Ostomy-Q显示出良好的收敛效度(P<.01)。在本研究中,发现Ostomy-Q是一种可靠且有效的结果测量工具,可增强对造口器具对使用者影响的理解。未来可能需要与其他患者群体进一步探讨一些关于社会关系和隐秘性的条目。

相似文献

1
The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.造口术问卷(Ostomy-Q):一种评估与造口器具相关结果的工具的开发及心理测量学验证
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(1):12-22.
2
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study.巴西结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者造口生活质量问卷的跨文化适应与验证:一项横断面研究
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 May;63(5):34-41.
3
The ostomy leak impact tool: development and validation of a new patient-reported tool to measure the burden of leakage in ostomy device users.造口漏影响工具:一种新的患者报告工具的开发和验证,用于测量造口装置使用者漏液负担
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 14;16(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1054-0.
4
A Descriptive Study Assessing Quality of Life for Adults With a Permanent Ostomy and the Influence of Preoperative Stoma Site Marking.一项评估永久性造口术成年患者生活质量及术前造口部位标记影响的描述性研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 May;62(5):14-24.
5
A Prospective, Explorative Study to Assess Adjustment 1 Year After Ostomy Surgery Among Swedish Patients.一项评估瑞典造口术患者术后1年调整情况的前瞻性探索性研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Jun;64(6):12-22.
6
A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study Among Chinese Patients to Identify Factors that Affect Psychosocial Adjustment to an Enterostomy.一项针对中国患者的描述性横断面研究,以确定影响对肠造口术心理社会适应的因素。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Jul;64(7):8-17.
7
Development and Validation of an Instrument Measuring Self-Care in Persons With a Fecal Ostomy.粪造口患者自我护理测量工具的开发与验证
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;45(4):335-340. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000444.
8
Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire.间歇性自我导尿问卷的编制及心理测量学验证。
Clin Ther. 2012 Dec;34(12):2302-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
9
The Ostomy Adjustment Scale: translation into Norwegian language with validation and reliability testing.造口调整量表:翻译成挪威语并进行效度和信度测试。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;41(4):357-64. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000041.
10
Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy.结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者生活质量问卷的编制与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 12;3:62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Living with an ostomy: A needs assessment in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.造口患者的生活:儿童炎症性肠病的需求评估
Health Care Transit. 2024 Aug 30;2:100069. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100069. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and pilot testing of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptoms of parastomal hernia.开发并初步测试一种患者报告结局测量工具,用于评估造口旁疝症状。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb;26(2):364-370. doi: 10.1111/codi.16850. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
Psychometric validation of the Ostomy Skin Tool 2.0.Ostomy Skin Tool 2.0 的心理计量学验证。
PeerJ. 2023 Dec 18;11:e16685. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16685. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluating the Performance and Perception of a Stoma Bag Full-Circle Filter in People with a Colostomy or an Ileostomy-Two Randomized Crossover Trials.评估结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者使用造口袋全环过滤器的性能和认知——两项随机交叉试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(3):369. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030369.
5
Patient reported outcome measures assessing quality of life in patients with an intestinal stoma: A systematic review.患者报告结局测量评估肠造口患者的生活质量:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;24(10):1128-1139. doi: 10.1111/codi.16202. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
The ostomy leak impact tool: development and validation of a new patient-reported tool to measure the burden of leakage in ostomy device users.造口漏影响工具:一种新的患者报告工具的开发和验证,用于测量造口装置使用者漏液负担
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 14;16(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1054-0.