Suppr超能文献

极早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的早期表面活性剂治疗

Early Surfactant Therapy for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Very Preterm Infants.

作者信息

Cucerea Manuela, Moscalu Mihaela, Moldovan Elena, Santa Reka, Gall Zsuzsanna, Suciu Laura Mihaela, Simon Marta

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):439. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030439.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is currently considered that early initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, using a less invasive exogenous surfactant administration and avoiding mechanical ventilation as much as possible to minimize lung damage, may reduce mortality and/or the risk of morbidities in preterm infants. The aim of our study was to quantify our experience and compare different strategies of surfactant administration, to investigate which method is associated with less morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 preterm infants with early rescue surfactant administration for respiratory distress syndrome were included in the study. The infants were treated in an academic, Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit over a 3-year period between 1 December 2018 and 1 December 2021. Patients were separated into three groups: those with standard surfactant administration; those with Less Invasive Surfactant Administration-LISA; and those with Intubation Surfactant Administration Extubation-INSURE. As a primary outcome, we followed the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 h, while the secondary outcomes were major neonatal morbidities and death before discharge.

RESULTS

The surfactant administration method was significantly associated with the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h after the procedure ( < 0.001). LISA group infants needed less MV (OR = 0.538, = 0.019) than INSURE group infants. We found less morbidities (OR = 0.492, = 0.015) and deaths before discharge (OR = 0.640, = 0.035) in the LISA group compared with the INSURE group. The analysis of morbidities found in infants who were given the surfactant by the LISA method compared with the INSURE method showed lower incidence of pneumothorax (3.9% vs. 8.8%), intraventricular hemorrhage (17.3% vs. 23.5%), intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 and 4 (3.9% vs. 5.9%), sepsis/probable sepsis (11.5% vs. 17.7%) retinopathy of prematurity (16.7% vs. 26.7%) and deaths (3.9% vs. 5.9%). There were no significant differences between groups in frequencies of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis and patent ductus arteriosus.

CONCLUSIONS

Less invasive surfactant administration methods seem to have advantages regarding early need for mechanical ventilation, decreasing morbidities and death rate. In our opinion, the LISA procedure may be a good choice in spontaneously breathing infants regardless of gestational age.

摘要

背景

目前认为,尽早开始鼻持续气道正压通气,采用侵入性较小的外源性表面活性剂给药方式,并尽可能避免机械通气以减少肺损伤,可能会降低早产儿的死亡率和/或发病风险。我们研究的目的是量化我们的经验并比较不同的表面活性剂给药策略,以研究哪种方法与较低的发病率相关。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入135例因呼吸窘迫综合征早期接受挽救性表面活性剂治疗的早产儿。这些婴儿于2018年12月1日至2021年12月1日的3年期间在一家学术性三级新生儿重症监护病房接受治疗。患者被分为三组:接受标准表面活性剂给药的患者;接受微创表面活性剂给药-LISA的患者;以及接受插管表面活性剂给药后拔管-INSURE的患者。作为主要结局,我们追踪了72小时内插管和机械通气的需求,而次要结局是主要的新生儿发病率和出院前死亡情况。

结果

表面活性剂给药方法与术后72小时内机械通气的需求显著相关(<0.001)。LISA组婴儿比INSURE组婴儿需要的机械通气更少(OR = 0.538,= 0.019)。与INSURE组相比,我们发现LISA组的发病率(OR = 0.492,= 0.015)和出院前死亡率(OR = 0.640,= 0.035)更低。对采用LISA方法与INSURE方法给予表面活性剂的婴儿中发现的发病率分析显示,气胸(3.9%对8.8%)、脑室内出血(17.3%对23.5%)、3级和4级脑室内出血(3.9%对5.9%)、败血症/可能的败血症(11.5%对17.7%)、早产儿视网膜病变(16.7%对26.7%)和死亡(3.9%对5.9%)的发生率较低。各组在支气管肺发育不良、坏死性小肠结肠炎和动脉导管未闭的发生率方面无显著差异。

结论

侵入性较小的表面活性剂给药方法在早期机械通气需求、降低发病率和死亡率方面似乎具有优势。我们认为,无论胎龄如何,LISA操作对于自主呼吸的婴儿可能是一个不错的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0791/9914192/b42ecd71013b/healthcare-11-00439-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验