Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者抗阻训练的强度差异:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Intensity Differences of Resistance Training for Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Fan Tenglong, Lin Man-Hsu, Kim Kijin

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.

Department of Sport Marketing, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):440. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030440.

Abstract

Resistance training is used as adjunctive therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the treatment effects of different intensities of resistance training in terms of glycemia, lipids, blood pressure, adaptations, and body measurements. A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), EBSCO (Elton B. Stephens Company) host, Cochrane Library, WOS (Web of Science), and Scopus databases with a cut-off date of April 2022, and reference lists of relevant reviews were also consulted. The literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. RoB2 (Risk of bias 2) tools were used for the literature quality assessment, the exercise intensity was categorized as medium-low intensity and high intensity, and the meta subgroup analysis was performed using R Version. A fixed or random effects model was selected for within-group analysis based on the heterogeneity test, and a random effects model was used for the analysis of differences between subgroups. A total of 36 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1491 participants. It was found that resistance training significantly improved HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin), fasting blood glucose, TG (triglycerides), TC (total cholesterol), and LDL (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels in patients with T2DM and caused a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure, percent of fat mass, and HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance) indexes. The effects of high and medium-low intensity resistance training on T2DM patients were different in terms of HOMA-IR, maximal oxygen consumption, weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and body mass indexes. Only medium-low intensity resistance training resulted in a decrease in HOMA-IR. In addition to weight (MD = 4.25, 95% CI: [0.27, 8.22], = 0%, = 0.04; MD = -0.33, 95% CI: [-2.05, 1.39], = 0%, = 0.76; between groups = 0.03) and HOMA-IR (MD = 0.11, 95% CI: [-0.40, -0.63], = 0%, = 0.85; MD = -1.09, 95% CI: [-1.83, -0.36], = 87%, = < 0.01; between groups = 0.0085), other indicators did not reach statistical significance in the level of difference within the two subgroups of high intensity and medium-low intensity. The treatment effects (merger effect values) of high intensity resistance training were superior to those of medium-low intensity resistance training in terms of HbA1c, TG, TC, LDL levels and diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, waist circumference, fat mass, and percentage of fat mass. Therefore, high intensity resistance training can be considered to be a better option to assist in the treatment of T2DM and reduce the risk of diabetic complications compared to medium-low intensity resistance training. Only one study reported an adverse event (skeletal muscle injury) associated with resistance training. Although results reflecting the difference in treatment effect between intensity levels reached no statistical significance, the practical importance of the study cannot be ignored.

摘要

抗阻训练被用作2型糖尿病(T2DM)的辅助治疗方法,本研究旨在探讨不同强度抗阻训练在血糖、血脂、血压、适应性和身体测量方面的治疗效果差异。截至2022年4月,我们在PubMed、EMBASE(医学文摘数据库)、EBSCO(埃尔顿·B·斯蒂芬斯公司)主机、Cochrane图书馆、WOS(科学引文索引)和Scopus数据库中进行了全面检索,并查阅了相关综述的参考文献列表。文献筛选和数据提取由两名研究人员独立进行。使用RoB2(偏倚风险2)工具进行文献质量评估,将运动强度分为中低强度和高强度,并使用R版本进行Meta亚组分析。根据异质性检验,选择固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行组内分析,使用随机效应模型分析亚组间差异。共纳入36项随机对照试验,共计1491名参与者。结果发现,抗阻训练显著改善了T2DM患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)水平,并使收缩压、脂肪量百分比和胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)指数显著降低。高强度和中低强度抗阻训练对T2DM患者的影响在HOMA-IR、最大摄氧量、体重、腰臀比和体重指数方面有所不同。只有中低强度抗阻训练导致HOMA-IR降低。除了体重(MD = 4.25,95%CI:[0.27, 8.22],I² = 0%,P = 0.04;MD = -0.33,95%CI:[-2.05, 1.39],I² = 0%,P = 0.76;组间P = 0.03)和HOMA-IR(MD = 0.11,95%CI:[-0.40, -(-0.63)],I² = 0%,P = 0.85;MD = -1.09,95%CI:[-1.83, -0.36],I² = 87%,P = < 0.01;组间P = 0.0085)外,其他指标在高强度和中低强度两个亚组的差异水平上未达到统计学意义。在HbA1c、TG、TC、LDL水平以及舒张压、静息心率、腰围、脂肪量和脂肪量百分比方面,高强度抗阻训练的治疗效果(合并效应值)优于中低强度抗阻训练。因此,与中低强度抗阻训练相比,高强度抗阻训练可被视为辅助治疗T2DM和降低糖尿病并发症风险的更好选择。只有一项研究报告了与抗阻训练相关的不良事件(骨骼肌损伤)。尽管反映强度水平间治疗效果差异的结果未达到统计学意义,但该研究的实际重要性不可忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e15b/9914423/ccec8823da70/healthcare-11-00440-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验