• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过多组分健康高中干预预防丹麦高中生压力——首次随访时的效果。

Preventing Stress among High School Students in Denmark through the Multicomponent Healthy High School Intervention-The Effectiveness at First Follow-Up.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031754.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20031754
PMID:36767122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914335/
Abstract

Stress is a widespread phenomenon and young people especially are experiencing high levels of stress. School-related factors are the most frequently self-reported stressors among adolescents, but few interventions have targeted the school environment. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Healthy High School (HHS) intervention on stress at a 9-month follow-up. The study included 5201 first-year high school students (~16 years) in Denmark. Participating schools were randomized into the HHS intervention (N = 15) or control group (N = 15). Baseline measurements were conducted in August 2016 and the follow-up was conducted in May 2017. The intervention was designed to promote well-being (primary outcome) by focusing on physical activity, meals, sleep, sense of security, and stress (secondary outcomes). The intervention comprised: structural initiatives at the school level; a teaching material; peer-led innovation workshops; and a smartphone app. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure stress. Intervention effects on perceived stress were estimated using an intention-to-treat approach with multiple imputations of missing data and multilevel general linear regression modelling. A total of 4577 students answered the baseline questionnaire. No statistically significant difference was found in stress between students at intervention and control schools at the follow-up (mean score: 16.7 versus 16.7, adjusted b = 0.42, 95% CI: -0.16;1.00). The HHS Study is one of the first large randomized controlled trials targeting school environmental stressors. Potential implementation failures and the failures of the program theory are discussed.

摘要

压力是一种普遍存在的现象,尤其是年轻人正经历着高压力。学业相关因素是青少年中最常报告的压力源,但很少有干预措施针对学校环境。本研究在 9 个月的随访中评估了健康高中(HHS)干预对压力的有效性。该研究纳入了丹麦 5201 名一年级高中生(约 16 岁)。参与学校被随机分为 HHS 干预组(N = 15)和对照组(N = 15)。基线测量于 2016 年 8 月进行,随访于 2017 年 5 月进行。该干预旨在通过关注体育活动、膳食、睡眠、安全感和压力(次要结果)来促进幸福感(主要结果)。干预措施包括:学校层面的结构性举措;教材;同伴主导的创新研讨会;和智能手机应用程序。使用 10 项感知压力量表来衡量压力。使用意向治疗方法和缺失数据的多重插补以及多层次一般线性回归模型来估计干预对感知压力的影响。共有 4577 名学生回答了基线问卷。在随访时,干预组和对照组学生的压力之间没有发现统计学上的显著差异(平均得分:16.7 与 16.7,调整 b = 0.42,95%CI:-0.16;1.00)。HHS 研究是首批针对学校环境压力源的大型随机对照试验之一。讨论了潜在的实施失败和项目理论的失败。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07d/9914335/e62e483fc15e/ijerph-20-01754-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07d/9914335/e62e483fc15e/ijerph-20-01754-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07d/9914335/e62e483fc15e/ijerph-20-01754-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Preventing Stress among High School Students in Denmark through the Multicomponent Healthy High School Intervention-The Effectiveness at First Follow-Up.通过多组分健康高中干预预防丹麦高中生压力——首次随访时的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031754.
2
Study protocol of the Healthy High School study: a school-based intervention to improve well-being among high school students in Denmark.《健康高中研究方案》:一项丹麦基于学校的干预措施,旨在改善高中生的幸福感。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8194-y.
3
Effect of the multicomponent healthy high school intervention on meal frequency and eating habits among high school students in Denmark: a cluster randomized controlled trial.丹麦多成分健康高中干预对高中生膳食频率和饮食习惯的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Feb 4;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01228-2.
4
What characterizes schools and students participating in health promoting school-based intervention studies? Findings from the healthy high school study.参与以学校为基础的健康促进干预研究的学校和学生有哪些特点?来自健康高中研究的结果。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 15;23:101491. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101491. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Intervention effects on adolescent physical activity in the multicomponent SPACE study: a cluster randomized controlled trial.多组分SPACE研究中干预对青少年身体活动的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099369. eCollection 2014.
6
Effectiveness of peer-based healthy living lesson plans on anthropometric measures and physical activity in elementary school students: a cluster randomized trial.同伴健康生活教案对小学生人体测量指标和身体活动的影响:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Apr;168(4):330-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3688.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: A cluster randomised controlled trial.促进英国青少年增加身体活动的 GoActive 干预措施的有效性和成本效益:一项集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 23;17(7):e1003210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003210. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
The West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted obesity prevention intervention programme targeted at children aged 6-7 years.西米德兰兹地区积极生活方式与儿童在校健康饮食研究(WAVES):一项针对 6-7 岁儿童的多方面肥胖预防干预计划的临床有效性和成本效益的集群随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(8):1-608. doi: 10.3310/hta22080.
9
Effects of a settings-based intervention to promote student wellbeing and reduce smoking in vocational schools: A non-randomized controlled study.一项基于学校环境的干预措施对促进职业学校学生健康及减少吸烟的影响:一项非随机对照研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jul;161:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Peer mentors' role in school-based health promotion: qualitative findings from the Young & Active study.同伴导师在学校健康促进中的作用:来自“年轻与活跃”研究的定性发现。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab089.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People Aged 16-25 Years: Scoping Review.针对16至25岁年轻人的数字心理健康干预措施:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 9;27:e72892. doi: 10.2196/72892.
2
Evidence and Gap Map of Whole-School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health-Promoting Schools Framework: An evidence and gap map.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全学校干预措施的证据与差距图:健康促进学校框架内的计划组成部分映射:一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;21(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What characterizes schools and students participating in health promoting school-based intervention studies? Findings from the healthy high school study.参与以学校为基础的健康促进干预研究的学校和学生有哪些特点?来自健康高中研究的结果。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 15;23:101491. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101491. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The effects of school-based interventions on physiological stress in adolescents: A meta-analysis.基于学校的干预措施对青少年生理应激的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Stress Health. 2022 Apr;38(2):187-209. doi: 10.1002/smi.3081. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Implementation of initiatives to prevent student stress: process evaluation findings from the Healthy High School study.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Whole-school Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence.
促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全校干预措施有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):271-289. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02135-6. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
4
Teaching methods for critical thinking in health education of children up to high school: A scoping review.高中以下儿童健康教育中批判性思维的教学方法:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307094. eCollection 2024.
预防学生压力举措的实施:健康高中研究的过程评估结果。
Health Educ Res. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):195-215. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaa003.
4
Can Schools Reduce Adolescent Psychological Stress? A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of School-Based Intervention Programs.学校能否减轻青少年的心理压力?基于学校的干预项目有效性的多层次元分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jun;49(6):1127-1145. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01201-5. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Study protocol of the Healthy High School study: a school-based intervention to improve well-being among high school students in Denmark.《健康高中研究方案》:一项丹麦基于学校的干预措施,旨在改善高中生的幸福感。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8194-y.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of School-Based Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Prevention Programs for Adolescents.基于学校的青少年压力、焦虑和抑郁预防计划的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Sep;48(9):1668-1685. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01085-0. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Examining subgroup effects by socioeconomic status of public health interventions targeting multiple risk behaviour in adolescence.探讨针对青少年多种危险行为的公共卫生干预措施的社会经济地位亚组效应。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6042-0.
8
School Demands and Coping Resources-Associations with Multiple Measures of Stress in Mid-Adolescent Girls and Boys.学校要求与应对资源——与青少年中期男女生多种压力测量指标的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 29;15(10):2143. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102143.
9
Chronic Stress in Adolescents and Its Neurobiological and Psychopathological Consequences: An RDoC Perspective.青少年慢性应激及其神经生物学和精神病理学后果:基于研究领域标准(RDoC)的视角
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 Jan-Dec;1. doi: 10.1177/2470547017715645. Epub 2017 Jun 18.
10
Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used.评估行为改变技术在健康相关行为中的有效性:方法的综述评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx019.