Potts Courtney, Kealy Carmen, McNulty Jamie M, Madrid-Cagigal Alba, Wilson Thomas, Mulvenna Maurice D, O'Neill Siobhan, Donohoe Gary, Barry Margaret M
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Health Promotion Research Centre, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe - University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 9;27:e72892. doi: 10.2196/72892.
Digital mental health interventions for young people offer a promising avenue for promoting mental well-being and addressing mental health issues in this population.
This scoping review aims to explore the range of digital mental health interventions available for young people aged 16-25 years, with a particular focus on digital tool types, modalities, delivery formats, target populations, and study retention rates.
The scoping review was conducted in 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsychInfo). Studies were included if they were published from 2019 to 2024 in English, reported on a population of young people aged 16-25 years, and included validated mental health or well-being outcome measures. All types of digital interventions from promotion and prevention to treatment of mental health were included.
After screening 13,306 articles, 145 articles were included in the final review. The findings reveal a diverse landscape of studies, equally focusing on the prevention and promotion of mental health and the treatment of mental ill health, most commonly using cognitive behavioral therapy (63/145, 43.4%). The most common digital tools were apps (51/135, 37.8%), web-based resources (45/135, 33.3%), and websites (19/135, 14.1%). The results highlight the over emphasis on convenience sampling (140/145, 96.6%), with participants mainly recruited from universities or colleges, and a lack of representation from marginalized groups, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth; those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds; and those who are neurodivergent. Moreover, the focus on anxiety and depression leaves other mental health conditions underrepresented. Retention rates ranged from 16% to 100% and averaged 66% across all studies.
There is a need for more research on mental health promotion and prevention measures among those aged younger than 25 years as young people are at increased risk of mental health issues. This includes exploring different intervention approaches and modalities beyond cognitive behavioral therapy and ensuring inclusivity in study populations. Standardizing intervention durations and incorporating long-term follow-up data could provide valuable insights into the efficacy and effectiveness of digital interventions. Future studies should aim for greater inclusivity, ensuring representation from marginalized groups to address the diverse mental health needs of young people effectively. By adopting these approaches, digital mental health interventions can become more accessible, engaging, and impactful for young people worldwide.
针对年轻人的数字心理健康干预为促进该人群的心理健康和解决心理健康问题提供了一条有前景的途径。
本范围综述旨在探索适用于16至25岁年轻人的数字心理健康干预措施的范围,特别关注数字工具类型、模式、交付形式、目标人群和研究保留率。
在6个数据库(PubMed、科学网、Scopus、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和PsychInfo)中进行范围综述。纳入2019年至2024年以英文发表、报告了16至25岁年轻人群体且包括经过验证的心理健康或幸福感结果测量的研究。包括从促进和预防到心理健康治疗的所有类型的数字干预。
在筛选了13306篇文章后,145篇文章被纳入最终综述。研究结果揭示了一个多样化的研究格局,同样关注心理健康的预防和促进以及精神疾病的治疗,最常用的是认知行为疗法(63/145,43.4%)。最常见的数字工具是应用程序(51/135,37.8%)、基于网络的资源(45/135,33.3%)和网站(19/135,14.1%)。结果突出了对便利抽样的过度强调(140/145,96.6%),参与者主要从大学招募,边缘化群体缺乏代表性,包括女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年;来自社会经济贫困背景的人;以及神经发育异常的人。此外,对焦虑和抑郁的关注使得其他心理健康状况的代表性不足。保留率从16%到100%不等,所有研究的平均保留率为66%。
由于年轻人心理健康问题的风险增加,需要对25岁以下人群的心理健康促进和预防措施进行更多研究。这包括探索认知行为疗法之外的不同干预方法和模式,并确保研究人群的包容性。标准化干预持续时间并纳入长期随访数据可以为数字干预的疗效和有效性提供有价值的见解。未来的研究应旨在提高包容性,确保边缘化群体的代表性,以有效满足年轻人多样化的心理健康需求。通过采用这些方法,数字心理健康干预可以对全球年轻人变得更容易获得、更具吸引力且更有影响力。