• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国试点碳市场是否导致碳泄漏?来自化工、建材和金属行业的新证据。

Does China's Pilot Carbon Market Cause Carbon Leakage? New Evidence from the Chemical, Building Material, and Metal Industries.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.

The Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031853.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20031853
PMID:36767226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915306/
Abstract

The carbon market is an effective market for reducing greenhouse gas emissions; however, the existence of carbon leakage affects the emissions reduction effect of the carbon market. Using the multiregional input-output (MRIO) model and the difference-in-differences (DID) methodology, this study examined whether the chemical, building materials, or metals industries in China's pilot carbon market have caused carbon leakage, the extent of the carbon leakage, and the areas to which the industries with carbon leakage have transferred their carbon emissions. The results showed that the pilot carbon market caused carbon leakage in the chemical, building materials, and metal industries. The building materials industry had the most serious carbon leakage, followed by the chemical industry, and the metal industry was the weakest. In addition, regardless of the industry, most of the areas affected by carbon leakage were concentrated in regions with relatively backward economic development and weak in-place environmental regulations, such as in the central and western regions. Compared with the other pilot areas, Guangdong was the area most likely to be affected by carbon leakage from other pilot areas. This study provides new evidence for the existence of carbon leakage in China's pilot carbon market from an industrial perspective.

摘要

碳市场是减少温室气体排放的有效市场;然而,碳泄漏的存在影响了碳市场的减排效果。本研究采用多区域投入产出(MRIO)模型和双重差分(DID)方法,检验了中国试点碳市场中的化工、建筑材料或金属行业是否造成了碳泄漏、碳泄漏的程度以及碳泄漏行业转移其碳排放的地区。结果表明,试点碳市场导致化工、建筑材料和金属行业出现碳泄漏。建筑材料行业的碳泄漏最为严重,其次是化工行业,金属行业最弱。此外,无论行业如何,受碳泄漏影响的地区大多集中在经济发展相对落后、就地环境法规薄弱的地区,如中西部地区。与其他试点地区相比,广东是最有可能受到其他试点地区碳泄漏影响的地区。本研究从产业角度为中国试点碳市场存在碳泄漏提供了新证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/b8f00d23b8d5/ijerph-20-01853-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/a7aa48455f15/ijerph-20-01853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/de59b15af22a/ijerph-20-01853-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/60d129f77dcf/ijerph-20-01853-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/308a3b9afe7a/ijerph-20-01853-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/c5634018e107/ijerph-20-01853-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/66e9d45270f4/ijerph-20-01853-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/75e3d6231219/ijerph-20-01853-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/f34938c0ff68/ijerph-20-01853-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/b8f00d23b8d5/ijerph-20-01853-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/a7aa48455f15/ijerph-20-01853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/de59b15af22a/ijerph-20-01853-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/60d129f77dcf/ijerph-20-01853-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/308a3b9afe7a/ijerph-20-01853-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/c5634018e107/ijerph-20-01853-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/66e9d45270f4/ijerph-20-01853-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/75e3d6231219/ijerph-20-01853-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/f34938c0ff68/ijerph-20-01853-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fb/9915306/b8f00d23b8d5/ijerph-20-01853-g009a.jpg

相似文献

1
Does China's Pilot Carbon Market Cause Carbon Leakage? New Evidence from the Chemical, Building Material, and Metal Industries.中国试点碳市场是否导致碳泄漏?来自化工、建材和金属行业的新证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031853.
2
Energy-related carbon emissions and structural emissions reduction of China's construction industry: the perspective of input-output analysis.中国建筑业的能源相关碳排放与结构减排:投入产出分析的视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):39515-39527. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17604-1. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China's Pilot Emission Trading Scheme.排放交易是否能提高碳生产力?来自中国试点排放交易计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155522.
4
China's pilot emissions trading schemes and competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the provincial industrial sub-sectors.中国的试点排放交易计划与竞争力:省级工业子行业的实证分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Mar 15;258:109997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109997. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
The priority of industrial sector coverage in China's national emission trading system: an application of the LASSO model.中国国家排放交易体系中工业部门覆盖范围的优先次序:LASSO 模型的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(1):594-608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30681-8. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Migration of manufacturing industries and transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: empirical evidence from China and Thailand.制造业迁移与贸易中隐含的碳排放转移:来自中国和泰国的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):25037-25049. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14674-z. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
The Impact of Waste Paper Recycling on the Carbon Emissions from China's Paper Industry.废纸回收对中国造纸业碳排放的影响。
Environ Manage. 2021 May;67(5):811-821. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01417-y. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Emission reductions, industrial competitiveness, and spillover effects under China's regional emission trading systems: Evidence from the iron and steel sector.中国区域排放交易体系下的减排、产业竞争力和溢出效应:来自钢铁行业的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118481. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118481. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
9
Is the "pollution haven hypothesis" valid for China's carbon trading system? A re-examination based on inter-provincial carbon emission transfer.“污染避难所假说”在中国碳交易体系中是否成立?基于省际碳排放转移的再检验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):40110-40122. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18737-7. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
The long term effects of carbon trading markets in China: Evidence from energy intensive industries.中国碳交易市场的长期影响:来自能源密集型产业的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 1):150311. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150311. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of carbon leakage under regionally differentiated climate policies.区域差异化气候政策下的碳泄漏问题综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 15;782:146765. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146765. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach.排放交易如何降低中国的碳强度?基于分解法和双重差分法的探究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.303. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China.
碳排放权交易计划能否产生波特效应?来自中国试点地区的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:565-577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.395. Epub 2018 Oct 30.