Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC Business School, HD LAB-Healthcare Datascience, LAB LIUC University Carlo Cattaneo, 21053 Castellanza, Italy.
Department of Oncology, ULSS 8 Berica Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;20(3):2107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032107.
Metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) represents an economic and societal burden worldwide. The present study has two aims. Firstly, it evaluates the benefits and the added value of the introduction of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in the Italian clinical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles with respect to the other available treatment options (represented by the best supportive care (BSC) and FOLFIRI (5-FU, irinotecan, and leucovorin) regimens). Secondly, it assesses the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, focusing on third- and fourth-line treatments. For the achievement of the above objective, a health technology assessment study was conducted in 2021, assuming the NHS perspective within a 3-month time horizon. The literature reported a better efficacy of FTD/TPI with respect to both BSC and FOLFIRI regimens. From an economic perspective, despite the additional economic resources that would be required, the investment could positively impact the overall survival rate for the patients treated with the FTD/TPI strategy. However, the innovative molecule would lead to a decrease in hospital accesses devoted to chemotherapy infusion, ranging from a minimum of 34% to a maximum of 44%, strictly dependent on FTD/TPI penetration rate, with a consequent opportunity to take on a greater number of oncological patients requiring drug administration for the treatment of any other cancer diseases. According to experts' opinions, lower perceptions of FTD/TPI emerged concerning equity aspects, whereas it would improve both individuals' and caregivers' quality of life. In conclusion, the results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to the introduction of FTD/TPI regarding the coverage of an important unmet medical need of patients with metastatic gastric cancer who were refractory to at least two prior therapies, with important advantages for patients and hospitals, thus optimizing the clinical pathway of such frail patients.
转移性胃癌(mGC)在全球范围内给经济和社会带来了负担。本研究有两个目的。首先,评估在意大利临床实践中引入替匹嘧啶氟尿苷(FTD/TPI)的益处和附加值,确定与其他可用治疗选择(代表最佳支持治疗(BSC)和 FOLFIRI(5-FU、伊立替康和亚叶酸)方案)相比的比较疗效和安全性概况。其次,评估对医院和患者的潜在经济和组织优势,重点关注三线和四线治疗。为了实现上述目标,在 2021 年进行了一项卫生技术评估研究,在 3 个月的时间范围内从 NHS 的角度出发。文献报道 FTD/TPI 相对于 BSC 和 FOLFIRI 方案具有更好的疗效。从经济角度来看,尽管需要额外的经济资源,但投资可能会对接受 FTD/TPI 治疗策略的患者的总生存率产生积极影响。然而,这种创新药物会导致用于化疗输注的医院就诊次数减少,范围从最低 34%到最高 44%,这严格取决于 FTD/TPI 的渗透率,因此有机会接收更多需要药物治疗的肿瘤患者,以治疗任何其他癌症疾病。根据专家的意见,FTD/TPI 在公平性方面的看法较低,而它将提高个体和护理人员的生活质量。总之,研究结果表明,在满足转移性胃癌患者的重要未满足医疗需求方面,引入 FTD/TPI 具有战略意义,这些患者对至少两种先前的治疗方案均耐药,对患者和医院都有重要优势,从而优化了此类脆弱患者的临床路径。