Suppr超能文献

三种正畸后清洁程序后的 3D 扫描牙釉质分析:一种新型压电工具的体外试验。

Enamel Analysis by 3D Scanning after Three Orthodontic Clean-Up Procedures: An In-Vitro Test of a New Piezoelectric Tool.

机构信息

Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Department of Oral Surgery, Tor Vergata University, 00100 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2516. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032516.

Abstract

(1) Background: To assess the clinical safety and efficacy of a new piezoelectric instrument for orthodontic clean-up; (2) Methods: An in-vitro comparative study on 75 teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons compared the tested method (Treatment 1) with two other procedures: One step finisher and polisher (Inverted cone One gloss Shofu Dental, Kyoto, Japan) (Treatment 2) and twelve-fluted tungsten carbide bur (123-603-00, Dentaurum, Pforzheim, Germany) and Sof-Lex discs Pop-On XT Kit (3M ESPE) (Treatment 3), with n:25 samples in each group. Clinical safety (enamel volume loss) and effectiveness (residual adhesive volume) were assessed using the structured light 3D scanner Atos Compact Scan (GOM GmbH) together with the support of Atos Professional software. The surfaces were scanned three times to assess: (i) the volume of the residual adhesive (RAV) after bracket removal; (ii) the volume of the relative residual adhesive () after the clean-up procedure; (iii) volume of the enamel loss (EVL); (3) Results: The mean RAV (mm) was 0.239 ± 0.337; 0.069 ± 0.124, 0.120 ± 0.193 and the mean EVL (mm) was 0.1870 ± 0.177, 0.187 ± 0.299 and 0.290 ± 0.205, for treatment 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The distribution was asymmetrical between groups in both cases; (4) Conclusions: The tested instrument proved to be effective and safe for post-orthodontic clean-up. With the increasing use of invisible aligners, the possibility of using an ergonomic and fast instrument is of benefit to both patient and practitioner.

摘要

(1)背景:评估一种新的用于正畸清洁的压电仪器的临床安全性和有效性;(2)方法:对 75 颗因正畸原因拔除的牙齿进行了体外对比研究,将受试方法(治疗 1)与另外两种方法进行了比较:一步精整抛光器(Inverted cone One gloss Shofu Dental,京都,日本)(治疗 2)和十二槽碳化钨车针(123-603-00,登特伦,普福尔茨海姆,德国)和 Sof-Lex 抛光片 Pop-On XT 试剂盒(3M ESPE)(治疗 3),每组 25 个样本。使用结构光 3D 扫描仪 Atos Compact Scan(GOM GmbH)和 Atos Professional 软件评估临床安全性(釉质体积损失)和有效性(残留粘结剂体积)。对表面进行了三次扫描,以评估:(i)去除托槽后残留粘结剂的体积(RAV);(ii)清洁后残留粘结剂的相对体积();(iii)釉质损失的体积(EVL);(3)结果:平均 RAV(mm)分别为 0.239 ± 0.337;0.069 ± 0.124,0.120 ± 0.193 和平均 EVL(mm)分别为 0.1870 ± 0.177,0.187 ± 0.299 和 0.290 ± 0.205,分别为治疗 1、2 和 3。在这两种情况下,组间分布均不对称;(4)结论:经测试的仪器在正畸后清洁中证明是有效和安全的。随着隐形矫治器的使用越来越多,使用一种符合人体工程学且快速的仪器对患者和医生都有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c89/9915299/b0c5ad455512/ijerph-20-02516-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验