• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独自分娩:COVID-19 大流行期间无分娩伴侣或其他陪伴者的围产期结局。

Laboring Alone: Perinatal Outcomes during Childbirth without a Birth Partner or Other Companion during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032614.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032614
PMID:36767981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916022/
Abstract

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020, the government of the Czech Republic issued a nationwide ban on visitors to maternity wards. We studied whether the absence of a close person during labor due to this ban impacted perinatal indicators. This study was performed using an administrative observational questionnaire focused on absolute frequencies of events sent to maternity facilities across the Czech Republic. Completed answers were received from 33 facilities covering 4805 births during the study period in 2019 and 4514 births in 2020. The differences in individual parameters were tested using Pearson's chi-squared homogeneity test. There were no significant differences between the two periods in spontaneous pre-term births ( = 0.522) or in the number of cesarean sections ( = 0.536). No significant changes were seen in either local or systemic analgesia. Data showed a significantly shorter ( = 0.026) first stage of labor in 2020 compared to 2019, while there was no significant difference ( = 0.673) in the second stage of labor. There was no statistically significant difference found for newborn perinatal adaptation. There were also no significant differences in intrapartum maternal injuries. Overall, we found no significant differences in basic perinatal indicators during the first wave of COVID-19 in 2020 compared to 2019. Although the absence of a close person may cause stress for the laboring women, it does not impair objective clinical outcomes.

摘要

在 2020 年春季 COVID-19 大流行的第一波期间,捷克共和国政府发布了一项全国性禁令,禁止访客进入产房。我们研究了由于该禁令导致分娩期间没有亲人陪伴是否会影响围产期指标。这项研究使用了一项行政观察性问卷进行,该问卷侧重于发送给捷克共和国各地妇产医院的事件的绝对频率。在 2019 年研究期间,33 家医院完成了调查,共收到 4805 例分娩和 2020 年的 4514 例分娩的完整答复。使用 Pearson's chi-squared 同质性检验测试了各个参数之间的差异。两个时期之间自发性早产( = 0.522)或剖宫产数量( = 0.536)均无显著差异。局部或全身镇痛也没有明显变化。数据显示,2020 年第一产程明显缩短( = 0.026),而第二产程无明显差异( = 0.673)。新生儿围产期适应情况无统计学差异。产时产妇损伤也无显著差异。总体而言,与 2019 年相比,2020 年 COVID-19 大流行的第一波期间基本围产期指标没有显著差异。尽管亲人不在场可能会给产妇带来压力,但这并不会损害客观的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ab/9916022/145427ccf2c3/ijerph-20-02614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ab/9916022/145427ccf2c3/ijerph-20-02614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ab/9916022/145427ccf2c3/ijerph-20-02614-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Laboring Alone: Perinatal Outcomes during Childbirth without a Birth Partner or Other Companion during the COVID-19 Pandemic.独自分娩:COVID-19 大流行期间无分娩伴侣或其他陪伴者的围产期结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032614.
2
Obstetric interventions and pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: A nationwide cohort study.在英格兰,COVID-19 大流行期间的产科干预措施和妊娠结局:一项全国性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 10;19(1):e1003884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003884. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on labor and childbirth care practices in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.COVID-19 大流行对巴西劳动力和分娩护理实践的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 3;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05358-2.
4
[Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].[2013年10月至2014年9月期间维索基纳地区围产期护理满意度]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Dec;80(6):426-35.
5
Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.北美医院中护士作为分娩支持提供者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Sep 18;288(11):1373-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1373.
6
Differences in obstetric healthcare utilization and delivery complications before and after the COVID-19 pandemic - a retrospective study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行前后产科医疗保健利用情况及分娩并发症的差异——一项回顾性研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):7194-7199. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1946506. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Turkey.COVID-19 大流行对围产期结局的影响:来自土耳其的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04349-5.
8
CCT: continuous care trial - a randomized controlled trial of the provision of continuous care during labor by maternity care assistants in the Netherlands.CCT:连续护理试验-荷兰母婴保健助理在分娩期间提供连续护理的随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03336-6.
9
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women.一项前瞻性研究,旨在探讨心理因素和睡眠对卑诗省低危孕妇产科干预、分娩方式和新生儿结局的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Aug 3;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-78.

本文引用的文献

1
Concerns about transmission, changed services and place of birth in the early COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey among Danish pregnant women. The COVIDPregDK study.对 COVID-19 大流行早期传播、服务改变和分娩地点的担忧:丹麦孕妇的全国性调查。COVIDPregDK 研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04108-6.
2
Experiences of Women Who Gave Birth in US Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间在美国医院分娩的女性的经历
J Patient Exp. 2021 Jan 12;8:2374373520981492. doi: 10.1177/2374373520981492. eCollection 2021.
3
Perceived social support and prenatal wellbeing; The mediating effects of loneliness and repetitive negative thinking on anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.
感知到的社会支持与产前幸福感;孤独感和重复性消极思维在新冠疫情期间对焦虑和抑郁的中介作用。
Women Birth. 2022 May;35(3):232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
The COVID-19 Pandemic Can Impact Perinatal Mental Health and the Health of the Offspring.新冠疫情会影响围产期心理健康及子代健康。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;10(11):162. doi: 10.3390/bs10110162.
5
Women's perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences: a qualitative thematic analysis of a national survey of pregnant women in the United Kingdom.女性对 COVID-19 的认知及其医疗保健体验:对英国全国孕妇进行的一项定性主题分析调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03283-2.
6
Concerns of women regarding pregnancy and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间女性对怀孕和分娩的担忧。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Sep 24;103(12):2578-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.031.
7
Increase in prevalence of current mental disorders in the context of COVID-19: analysis of repeated nationwide cross-sectional surveys.新冠疫情背景下当前精神障碍患病率的增加:重复全国性横断面调查分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Sep 29;29:e173. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000888.
8
Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review.在新冠疫情大流行期间对女性造成不成比例影响的健康风险和结果:综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113364. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113364. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
9
Vulnerability and resilience to pandemic-related stress among U.S. women pregnant at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.美国 COVID-19 大流行初期怀孕女性对大流行相关压力的脆弱性和适应力。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113348. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113348. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
10
Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown.丹麦 COVID-19 封锁期间的早产率。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Jan;106(1):93-95. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319990. Epub 2020 Aug 11.