Urology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Science, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 22;24(3):2185. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032185.
In the United States, prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. CaP is predominantly indolent at diagnosis, with a small fraction (25-30%) representing an aggressive subtype (Gleason score 7-10) that is prone to metastatic progression. This fact, coupled with the criticism surrounding the role of prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer screening, demonstrates the current need for a biomarker(s) that can identify clinically significant CaP and avoid unnecessary biopsy procedures and psychological implications of being diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Although several diagnostic biomarkers are available to clinicians, very few comparative trials have been performed to assess the clinical effectiveness of these biomarkers. It is of note, however, that a majority of these clinical trials have been over-represented by men of Caucasian origin, despite the fact that African American men have a 1.7 times higher incidence and 2.1 times higher rate of mortality from prostate cancer. Biomarkers for CaP diagnosis based on the tissue of origin include urine-based gene expression assays (PCA3, Select MDx, ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore, Mi-Prostate Score, PCA3-PCGEM1 gene panel), blood-based protein biomarkers (4K, PHI), and tissue-based DNA biomarker (Confirm MDx). Another potential direction that has emerged to aid in the CaP diagnosis include multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), which in conjunction with clinically validated biomarkers may provide a better approach to predict clinically significant CaP at diagnosis. In this review, we discuss some of the adjunctive biomarker tests along with newer imaging modalities that are currently available to help clinicians decide which patients are at risk of having high-grade CaP on prostate biopsy with the emphasis on clinical utility of the tests across African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men.
在美国,前列腺癌(CaP)仍然是男性癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。CaP 在诊断时主要是惰性的,只有一小部分(25-30%)代表侵袭性亚型(Gleason 评分 7-10),容易发生转移进展。这一事实,加上围绕前列腺特异性抗原在前列腺癌筛查中的作用的批评,表明目前需要一种(多种)生物标志物,可以识别临床上有意义的 CaP,并避免不必要的活检程序和被诊断为低危前列腺癌的心理影响。尽管有几种诊断生物标志物可供临床医生使用,但很少有比较试验来评估这些生物标志物的临床效果。然而,值得注意的是,这些临床试验大多数都是由白种人男性代表的,尽管事实上,非洲裔美国男性的前列腺癌发病率高出 1.7 倍,死亡率高出 2.1 倍。基于起源组织的 CaP 诊断生物标志物包括基于尿液的基因表达检测(PCA3、Select MDx、ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore、Mi-Prostate Score、PCA3-PCGEM1 基因检测)、基于血液的蛋白质生物标志物(4K、PHI)和基于组织的 DNA 生物标志物(Confirm MDx)。另一个出现的潜在方向是辅助 CaP 诊断,包括多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI),与经过临床验证的生物标志物结合使用,可能为在诊断时预测临床上有意义的 CaP 提供更好的方法。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了一些辅助生物标志物检测以及目前可用的新成像方式,这些方式可以帮助临床医生决定哪些患者在前列腺活检中患有高级别 CaP 的风险较高,重点是这些检测在非洲裔美国(AA)和白种人(CA)男性中的临床应用。