Skoda Réka, Nemes Attila, Bárczi György, Vágó Hajnalka, Ruzsa Zoltán, Édes István F, Oláh Attila, Kosztin Annamária, Dinya Elek, Merkely Béla, Becker Dávid
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):917. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030917.
Due to the lifelong nature of diabetes mellitus (DM), it has been demonstrated to have significant effects on patients' morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to assess the effects of DM on the clinical outcome and survival in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the relationship of DM to the type of the MI and to left ventricular (LV) and renal functions. A total of 12,270 patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) were revascularized at our Institution between 2005 and 2013. In this pool of patients, 4388 subjects had DM, while 7018 cases had no DM. In both STEMI and NSTEMI, the 30-day and 1-year survival were worse in diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetic cases. In the patients with DM, NSTEMI showed worse prognosis within 1-year than STEMI similarly to non-diabetic subjects. Regarding survival, the presence of DM seemed to be more important than the type of MI. Regardless of the presence of DM, reduced LV function was a maleficent prognostic sign and DM significantly reduced the prognosis both in case of reduced and normal LV function. Survival is primarily affected by LV function, rather than DM. Worse renal function is associated with worse 30-day and 1-year survival in both cases with and without DM. Considering different renal functions, the presence of DM worsens both short- and long-term survival. Survival is primarily affected by renal function, rather than DM. The results from a high-volume PCI center confirm significant the negative prognostic impact of DM on survival in MI patients. DM is a more important prognostic factor than the type of the MI. However, survival is primarily affected by LV and renal functions, rather than DM. These results could highlight our attention on the importance of recent DM treatment with new drugs including SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 antagonists with beneficial effects on survival.
由于糖尿病(DM)具有终身性,已证明其对患者的发病率和死亡率有重大影响。本研究旨在评估DM对因心肌梗死(MI)接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的临床结局和生存率的影响,并探讨DM与MI类型以及左心室(LV)和肾功能之间的关系。2005年至2013年期间,共有12270例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者在本机构接受了血运重建治疗。在这组患者中,4388例患有DM,而7018例没有DM。在STEMI和NSTEMI患者中,糖尿病患者的30天和1年生存率均低于非糖尿病患者。在患有DM的患者中,与非糖尿病患者类似,NSTEMI在1年内的预后比STEMI更差。关于生存率,DM的存在似乎比MI类型更重要。无论是否存在DM,左心室功能降低都是不良预后指标,并且在左心室功能降低和正常的情况下,DM都会显著降低预后。生存率主要受左心室功能影响,而非DM。在有DM和无DM的情况下,肾功能较差均与30天和1年生存率较差相关。考虑到不同的肾功能,DM的存在会使短期和长期生存率均恶化。生存率主要受肾功能影响,而非DM。来自一个大容量PCI中心的结果证实了DM对MI患者生存率具有显著的负面预后影响。DM是比MI类型更重要的预后因素。然而,生存率主要受左心室和肾功能影响,而非DM。这些结果可能会使我们更加关注近期使用包括钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)拮抗剂在内的新药治疗DM对生存率有益的重要性。