• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在常规临床治疗中对有或无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病或心力衰竭病史的老年患者的心血管疗效。

Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Older Patients in Routine Clinical Care With or Without History of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases or Heart Failure.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA.

University of North Carolina at Chapel HillSchool of Medicine Chapel Hill NC.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e022376. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022376. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.022376
PMID:35132865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245812/
Abstract

Background Randomized trials demonstrate the cardioprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). We evaluated their relative cardiovascular effectiveness in routine care populations with a broad spectrum of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) or heart failure (HF). Methods and Results We identified Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2017, aged >65 years, initiating SGLT2i (n=24 747) or GLP-1RA (n=22 596) after a 1-year baseline. On the basis of diagnoses during baseline, we classified patients into: (1) no HF or CVD, (2) HF but no CVD, (3) no HF but CVD, and (4) both HF and CVD. We identified hospitalized HF and atherosclerotic CVD outcomes from drug initiation until treatment changes, death, or disenrollment. We estimated propensity score-weighted 2-year risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences, accounting for measured confounding, informative censoring, and competing risk. In patients with no CVD or HF, SGLT2i reduced the hospitalized HF risk compared with GLP-1RA (propensity score-weighted RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96). The association was strongest in those who had HF but no CVD (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85). The combined myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality outcome risk was slightly higher for SGLT2i compared with GLP-1RA in those without CVD or HF (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56). The association was favorable toward SGLT2i in subgroups with a history of HF. Conclusions SGLT2i reduced the cardiovascular risk versus GLP-1RA in patients with a history of HF but no CVD. Atherosclerotic CVD events were less frequent with GLP-1RA in those without prior CVD or HF.

摘要

背景

随机试验证明钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)具有心脏保护作用。我们评估了它们在具有广泛动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(CVD)或心力衰竭(HF)病史的常规护理人群中的相对心血管有效性。

方法和结果

我们从 2013 年至 2017 年确定了 Medicare 受益人,年龄>65 岁,在基线后 1 年内开始使用 SGLT2i(n=24747)或 GLP-1RA(n=22596)。根据基线期间的诊断,我们将患者分为:(1)无 HF 或 CVD,(2)HF 但无 CVD,(3)无 HF 但有 CVD,(4)HF 和 CVD 均有。我们从药物起始到治疗改变、死亡或退出登记,确定了住院 HF 和动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 结局。我们估计了倾向评分加权的 2 年风险比(RR)和风险差异,考虑了测量的混杂因素、信息性删失和竞争风险。在无 CVD 或 HF 的患者中,与 GLP-1RA 相比,SGLT2i 降低了住院 HF 的风险(倾向评分加权 RR,0.65;95%CI,0.43-0.96)。在 HF 但无 CVD 的患者中,该关联最强(RR,0.48;95%CI,0.25-0.85)。在无 CVD 或 HF 的患者中,与 GLP-1RA 相比,SGLT2i 的心肌梗死、中风和死亡率风险略高(RR,1.31;95%CI,1.09-1.56)。在有 HF 病史的亚组中,SGLT2i 的结果更为有利。

结论

在有 HF 病史但无 CVD 的患者中,SGLT2i 降低了心血管风险,与 GLP-1RA 相比。在没有先前 CVD 或 HF 的患者中,GLP-1RA 的动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 事件发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/c44f23076b35/JAH3-11-e022376-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/1d4ffd1aca3c/JAH3-11-e022376-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/b312127e9136/JAH3-11-e022376-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/43d8f0eee248/JAH3-11-e022376-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/e422558cb1b8/JAH3-11-e022376-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/ea7c52482051/JAH3-11-e022376-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/c44f23076b35/JAH3-11-e022376-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/1d4ffd1aca3c/JAH3-11-e022376-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/b312127e9136/JAH3-11-e022376-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/43d8f0eee248/JAH3-11-e022376-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/e422558cb1b8/JAH3-11-e022376-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/ea7c52482051/JAH3-11-e022376-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be47/9245812/c44f23076b35/JAH3-11-e022376-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Older Patients in Routine Clinical Care With or Without History of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases or Heart Failure.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在常规临床治疗中对有或无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病或心力衰竭病史的老年患者的心血管疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e022376. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022376. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Cardiorenal effectiveness of empagliflozin vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: final-year results from the EMPRISE study.恩格列净与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对心肾的疗效:来自 EMPRISE 研究的最终年度结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 8;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02150-0.
3
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂用于心血管疾病患者:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD013650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2.
4
Primary Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events After Adding Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors or Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Compared With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Cohort Study in Veterans With Diabetes.与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂相比,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂添加后心血管事件的初次发生:一项糖尿病退伍军人队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jun;176(6):751-760. doi: 10.7326/M22-2751. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP4 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂在射血分数降低和保留的心衰患者中的心血管结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Mar 10;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01784-w.
6
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Risk of Hospitalization.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与住院风险。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;165:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.11.013. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
7
All-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and with combination therapy in people with type 2 diabetes.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂及其联合治疗在 2 型糖尿病患者中的全因死亡率和心血管结局。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Oct;25(10):2897-2909. doi: 10.1111/dom.15185. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
The efficacy and safety of novel classes of glucose-lowering drugs for cardiovascular outcomes: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.新型降糖药物对心血管结局的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的网状Meta分析
Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2676-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05529-w. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
9
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在老年患者中的比较有效性和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):826-835. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1464. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
10
Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Addition of SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas to Baseline GLP-1RA Therapy.在 GLP-1RA 治疗基础上加用 SGLT2 抑制剂与磺脲类药物相比,2 型糖尿病患者发生心血管结局的风险。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):770-779. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047965. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂在老年2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 26;16:1486655. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1486655. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering drugs in elderly with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation cohort study.新型降糖药物对老年2型糖尿病患者心血管疗效的比较:一项目标试验模拟队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 21;82:103162. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103162. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction.恩格列净治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1451-1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在老年患者中的比较有效性和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):826-835. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1464. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Emulating Randomized Clinical Trials With Nonrandomized Real-World Evidence Studies: First Results From the RCT DUPLICATE Initiative.
Comparing Insulin Against Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on 5-Year Incident Heart Failure Risk for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Evidence Study Using Insurance Claims.
比较胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者5年新发心力衰竭风险的影响:一项基于保险理赔数据的真实世界证据研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Oct 22;9:e58137. doi: 10.2196/58137.
4
High-dimensional Iterative Causal Forest (hdiCF) for Subgroup Identification Using Health Care Claims Data.使用医疗保健理赔数据进行亚组识别的高维迭代因果森林(hdiCF)
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae322.
5
Comparative safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nursing homes.养老院中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的比较安全性和心血管效果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3403-3417. doi: 10.1111/dom.15682. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Cardiorenal effectiveness of empagliflozin vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: final-year results from the EMPRISE study.恩格列净与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对心肾的疗效:来自 EMPRISE 研究的最终年度结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 8;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02150-0.
7
Cardiovascular Outcomes of α-Blockers vs 5-α Reductase Inhibitors for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.α-受体阻滞剂与 5-α 还原酶抑制剂治疗良性前列腺增生的心血管结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343299. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43299.
8
Iterative Causal Forest: A Novel Algorithm for Subgroup Identification.迭代因果森林:一种新的亚组识别算法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 May 7;193(5):764-776. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad219.
9
Treatment effect heterogeneity following type 2 diabetes treatment with GLP1-receptor agonists and SGLT2-inhibitors: a systematic review.使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病后的治疗效果异质性:一项系统评价
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):131. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00359-w.
10
Reporting of Observational Studies Explicitly Aiming to Emulate Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review.旨在模拟随机试验的观察性研究报告:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2336023. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36023.
基于真实世界证据的非随机研究模拟随机对照试验:RCT DUPLICATE 计划的初步结果。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):1002-1013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051718. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes by race, ethnicity, and region: A meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件的影响:按种族、民族和地区进行的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23489. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023489.
5
Comparison of the effects of 10 GLP-1 RA and SGLT2 inhibitor interventions on cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis of large randomized trials.比较 10 种 GLP-1RA 和 SGLT2 抑制剂干预措施对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管、死亡率和肾脏结局的影响:大型随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Apr;15(2):208-211. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure.恩格列净治疗心力衰竭的心血管和肾脏结局。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.2020年2型糖尿病患者降低心血管风险新型疗法专家共识决策路径:美国心脏病学会解决方案集监督委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;76(9):1117-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.037. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in real-life.在真实世界中,接受 SGLT-2 抑制剂与 GLP-1 受体激动剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001451.
9
Risk of cardiovascular events and death associated with initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors: an analysis from the CVD-REAL 2 multinational cohort study.与起始使用 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂与心血管事件和死亡风险的相关性:来自 CVD-REAL 2 多国队列研究的分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jul;8(7):606-615. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30130-3.
10
A causal framework for classical statistical estimands in failure-time settings with competing events.具有竞争事件的失效时间设置中经典统计估计量的因果框架。
Stat Med. 2020 Apr 15;39(8):1199-1236. doi: 10.1002/sim.8471. Epub 2020 Jan 27.