• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于动态响应数据的裂纹扩展预测的机器学习算法适用性分析。

Suitability Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Crack Growth Prediction Based on Dynamic Response Data.

机构信息

School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;23(3):1074. doi: 10.3390/s23031074.

DOI:10.3390/s23031074
PMID:36772118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9921187/
Abstract

Machine learning has the potential to enhance damage detection and prediction in materials science. Machine learning also has the ability to produce highly reliable and accurate representations, which can improve the detection and prediction of damage compared to the traditional knowledge-based approaches. These approaches can be used for a wide range of applications, including material design; predicting material properties; identifying hidden relationships; and classifying microstructures, defects, and damage. However, researchers must carefully consider the appropriateness of various machine learning algorithms, based on the available data, material being studied, and desired knowledge outcomes. In addition, the interpretability of certain machine learning models can be a limitation in materials science, as it may be difficult to understand the reasoning behind predictions. This paper aims to make novel contributions to the field of material engineering by analyzing the compatibility of dynamic response data from various material structures with prominent machine learning approaches. The purpose of this is to help researchers choose models that are both effective and understandable, while also enhancing their understanding of the model's predictions. To achieve this, this paper analyzed the requirements and characteristics of commonly used machine learning algorithms for crack propagation in materials. This analysis assisted the authors in selecting machine learning algorithms (K nearest neighbor, Ridge, and Lasso regression) to evaluate the dynamic response of aluminum and ABS materials, using experimental data from previous studies to train the models. The results showed that natural frequency was the most significant predictor for ABS material, while temperature, natural frequency, and amplitude were the most important predictors for aluminum. Crack location along samples had no significant impact on either material. Future work could involve applying the discussed techniques to a wider range of materials under dynamic loading conditions.

摘要

机器学习在材料科学中的损伤检测和预测方面具有巨大的潜力。机器学习还具有生成高度可靠和准确表示的能力,与传统的基于知识的方法相比,可以提高损伤的检测和预测能力。这些方法可应用于广泛的领域,包括材料设计、预测材料性能、识别隐藏关系以及对微观结构、缺陷和损伤进行分类。然而,研究人员必须根据可用数据、研究的材料和所需的知识成果,仔细考虑各种机器学习算法的适用性。此外,某些机器学习模型的可解释性可能是材料科学中的一个限制,因为可能难以理解预测背后的推理。本文旨在通过分析来自各种材料结构的动态响应数据与突出的机器学习方法的兼容性,为材料工程领域做出新的贡献。目的是帮助研究人员选择既有效又易于理解的模型,同时增强对模型预测的理解。为此,本文分析了常用机器学习算法在材料裂纹扩展中的要求和特点。该分析帮助作者选择了机器学习算法(K 最近邻、岭回归和 Lasso 回归)来评估铝和 ABS 材料的动态响应,使用以前研究的实验数据来训练模型。结果表明,固有频率是 ABS 材料的最重要预测因子,而温度、固有频率和振幅是铝的最重要预测因子。裂纹位置对两种材料均无显著影响。未来的工作可以涉及在更广泛的动态加载条件下应用所讨论的技术来研究更多的材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/77d110eaa6b6/sensors-23-01074-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/0e76cbb3e331/sensors-23-01074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/8a2dc7cd48ca/sensors-23-01074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/daf082ef7414/sensors-23-01074-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/eea2a6943299/sensors-23-01074-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/ca1af0772f77/sensors-23-01074-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/89dc7bf650e8/sensors-23-01074-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/fc898263330b/sensors-23-01074-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/86b31250cf3f/sensors-23-01074-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/4dac90f93520/sensors-23-01074-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/4278022de2f8/sensors-23-01074-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/77d110eaa6b6/sensors-23-01074-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/0e76cbb3e331/sensors-23-01074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/8a2dc7cd48ca/sensors-23-01074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/daf082ef7414/sensors-23-01074-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/eea2a6943299/sensors-23-01074-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/ca1af0772f77/sensors-23-01074-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/89dc7bf650e8/sensors-23-01074-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/fc898263330b/sensors-23-01074-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/86b31250cf3f/sensors-23-01074-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/4dac90f93520/sensors-23-01074-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/4278022de2f8/sensors-23-01074-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f2e/9921187/77d110eaa6b6/sensors-23-01074-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Suitability Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Crack Growth Prediction Based on Dynamic Response Data.基于动态响应数据的裂纹扩展预测的机器学习算法适用性分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;23(3):1074. doi: 10.3390/s23031074.
2
A Machine Learning Approach to Model Interdependencies between Dynamic Response and Crack Propagation.一种用于模拟动态响应与裂纹扩展之间相互关系的机器学习方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 30;20(23):6847. doi: 10.3390/s20236847.
3
Automated Prediction of Crack Propagation Using H2O AutoML.使用H2O自动机器学习技术自动预测裂纹扩展
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;23(20):8419. doi: 10.3390/s23208419.
4
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Teaching a Machine to Feel Postoperative Pain: Combining High-Dimensional Clinical Data with Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast Acute Postoperative Pain.教机器感知术后疼痛:将高维临床数据与机器学习算法相结合以预测急性术后疼痛。
Pain Med. 2015 Jul;16(7):1386-401. doi: 10.1111/pme.12713. Epub 2015 May 29.
6
Seasonal prediction of daily PM concentrations with interpretable machine learning: a case study of Beijing, China.基于可解释机器学习的日 PM 浓度季节性预测:以中国北京为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):45821-45836. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18913-9. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation.基于机器学习的疲劳裂纹扩展计算算法的比较研究
Materials (Basel). 2017 May 18;10(5):543. doi: 10.3390/ma10050543.
8
Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.我们是否需要不同的机器学习算法来进行定量构效关系建模?对 16 种机器学习算法在 14 个定量构效关系数据集上的综合评估。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Jul 20;22(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa321.
9
Predictive Abilities of Machine Learning Techniques May Be Limited by Dataset Characteristics: Insights From the UNOS Database.机器学习技术的预测能力可能受到数据集特征的限制:来自 UNOS 数据库的见解。
J Card Fail. 2019 Jun;25(6):479-483. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Active learning for prediction of tensile properties for material extrusion additive manufacturing.活性学习在材料挤压增材制造拉伸性能预测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 15;13(1):11460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38527-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing decision making framework on built-up site suitability assessment for urban regeneration in the industrial cities of Eastern India.为印度东部工业城市的城市更新制定关于建成区场地适宜性评估的决策框架。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 17;15(1):5708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90408-2.
2
Automated Prediction of Crack Propagation Using H2O AutoML.使用H2O自动机器学习技术自动预测裂纹扩展
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;23(20):8419. doi: 10.3390/s23208419.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdependencies between Dynamic Response and Crack Growth in a 3D-Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Cantilever Beam under Thermo-Mechanical Loads.热机械载荷作用下3D打印丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)悬臂梁动态响应与裂纹扩展之间的相互依存关系
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;14(5):982. doi: 10.3390/polym14050982.
2
A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials.复合材料加工过程中回归模型预测性能的比较分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 6;14(21):6689. doi: 10.3390/ma14216689.
3
A Machine Learning Approach to Model Interdependencies between Dynamic Response and Crack Propagation.
一种用于模拟动态响应与裂纹扩展之间相互关系的机器学习方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 30;20(23):6847. doi: 10.3390/s20236847.
4
Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Auto Classification of Smartphone Measured Bridge Vibration Data.基于深度学习的智能手机测量桥梁振动数据实时自动分类
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 9;20(9):2710. doi: 10.3390/s20092710.
5
Multi-feature Fusion and Damage Identification of Large Generator Stator Insulation Based on Lamb Wave Detection and SVM Method.基于兰姆波检测和支持向量机方法的大型发电机定子绝缘多特征融合与损伤识别
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 29;19(17):3733. doi: 10.3390/s19173733.