• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较中年健康受试者上肢运动的各种平滑度指标。

Comparison of Various Smoothness Metrics for Upper Limb Movements in Middle-Aged Healthy Subjects.

机构信息

UR 7377 BIOTN, Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), F-94000 Créteil, France.

AP-HP, Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, Unité de Neurorééducation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, F-94000 Créteil, France.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;23(3):1158. doi: 10.3390/s23031158.

DOI:10.3390/s23031158
PMID:36772197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9919347/
Abstract

BACKGOUND

Metrics for movement smoothness include the number of zero-crossings on the acceleration profile (N0C), the log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ), the normalized averaged rectified jerk (NARJ) and the spectral arc length (SPARC). Sensitivity to the handedness and movement type of these four metrics was compared and correlations with other kinematic parameters were explored in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy participants underwent 3D upper limb motion analysis during two sets of pointing movements on each side. They performed forward- and backward-pointing movements at a self-selected speed to a target located ahead at shoulder height and at 90% arm length, with and without a three-second pause between forward and backward movements. Kinematics were collected, and smoothness metrics were computed.

RESULTS

LDLJ, NARJ and N0C found backward movements to be smoother, while SPARC found the opposite. Inter- and intra-subject coefficients of variation were lowest for SPARC. LDLJ, NARJ and N0C were correlated with each other and with movement time, unlike SPARC.

CONCLUSION

There are major differences between smoothness metrics measured in the temporal domain (N0C, LDLJ, NARJ), which depend on movement time, and those measured in the frequency domain, the SPARC, which gave results opposite to the other metrics when comparing backward and forward movements.

摘要

背景

运动平滑度的度量指标包括加速度曲线的过零点数量(N0C)、无量纲对数冲击(LDLJ)、归一化平均校正冲击(NARJ)和频谱弧长(SPARC)。本研究比较了这四个指标对手性和运动类型的敏感性,并在健康受试者中探索了它们与其他运动学参数的相关性。

方法

32 名健康参与者在两侧进行了两组指向运动的 3D 上肢运动分析。他们以自选择的速度向位于肩高和 90%臂长处的目标进行向前和向后的指向运动,在向前和向后运动之间有 3 秒的停顿。收集运动学数据,并计算平滑度指标。

结果

LDLJ、NARJ 和 N0C 发现向后运动更平滑,而 SPARC 则发现相反的结果。SPARC 的个体间和个体内变异系数最低。LDLJ、NARJ 和 N0C 彼此相关,与运动时间相关,而 SPARC 则不然。

结论

在时域(N0C、LDLJ、NARJ)测量的平滑度指标与运动时间有关,而在频域(SPARC)测量的平滑度指标则有很大的差异,当比较向后和向前运动时,SPARC 的结果与其他指标相反。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/8e80ecfa9a72/sensors-23-01158-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/a89653841321/sensors-23-01158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/38b655d3a57e/sensors-23-01158-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/0201f94977cb/sensors-23-01158-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/8e80ecfa9a72/sensors-23-01158-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/a89653841321/sensors-23-01158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/38b655d3a57e/sensors-23-01158-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/0201f94977cb/sensors-23-01158-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675c/9919347/8e80ecfa9a72/sensors-23-01158-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Various Smoothness Metrics for Upper Limb Movements in Middle-Aged Healthy Subjects.比较中年健康受试者上肢运动的各种平滑度指标。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;23(3):1158. doi: 10.3390/s23031158.
2
Measurement properties of movement smoothness metrics for upper limb reaching movements in people with moderate to severe subacute stroke.上肢运动流畅性度量在中重度亚急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动中的测量性能。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 May 29;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01382-1.
3
Estimating Movement Smoothness From Inertial Measurement Units.通过惯性测量单元估计运动平滑度
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 14;8:558771. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.558771. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluation of Gait Smoothness in Patients with Stroke Undergoing Rehabilitation: Comparison between Two Metrics.评估脑卒中患者康复治疗中的步态平滑度:两种指标的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;19(20):13440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013440.
5
Smoothness metrics for reaching performance after stroke. Part 1: which one to choose?脑卒中后恢复运动功能的平滑度评估指标。第 1 部分:应该选择哪一个?
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Oct 26;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00949-6.
6
Characterization of stroke-related upper limb motor impairments across various upper limb activities by use of kinematic core set measures.运用运动学核心集测量指标对各种上肢活动中的脑卒中相关上肢运动功能障碍进行特征描述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jan 12;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00979-0.
7
Motion Smoothness Metrics for Cannulation Skill Assessment: What Factors Matter?用于插管技能评估的运动平滑度指标:哪些因素至关重要?
Front Robot AI. 2021 Apr 16;8:625003. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.625003. eCollection 2021.
8
Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.脑卒中患者接受 3 个月的机器人辅助上肢训练后,上肢指向任务运动学的改善模式。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Oct 13;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0315-1.
9
Movement smoothness during a functional mobility task in subjects with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait - an analysis using inertial measurement units.帕金森病患者在进行功能性移动任务时的运动平稳性和冻结步态——使用惯性测量单元进行的分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Sep 5;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0579-8.
10
Comparison of upper limb kinematics in two activities of daily living with different handling requirements.比较两种日常活动中上肢运动学的差异,这两种活动对操作有不同的要求。
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Aug;72:102632. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102632. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of intelligent robotic-assisted training system combined with repetitive facilitative exercise on upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.智能机器人辅助训练系统结合重复性促进训练对脑卒中后上肢运动功能的有效性:一项随机对照试验
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 3;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01234-y.
2
The effect of gravity on hand spatio-temporal kinematic features during functional movements.重力对功能性运动过程中手部时空运动学特征的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0310192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310192. eCollection 2024.
3
Measurement properties of movement smoothness metrics for upper limb reaching movements in people with moderate to severe subacute stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Chopstick operation training with the left non-dominant hand.用非优势左手进行筷子操作训练。
Transl Neurosci. 2021 Oct 22;12(1):385-395. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2020-0189. eCollection 2021 Jan 1.
2
Smoothness metrics for reaching performance after stroke. Part 1: which one to choose?脑卒中后恢复运动功能的平滑度评估指标。第 1 部分:应该选择哪一个?
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Oct 26;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00949-6.
3
Smoothness metric during reach-to-grasp after stroke: part 2. longitudinal association with motor impairment.
上肢运动流畅性度量在中重度亚急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动中的测量性能。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 May 29;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01382-1.
4
Assessing Spatiotemporal and Quality Alterations in Paretic Upper Limb Movements after Stroke in Routine Care: Proposal and Validation of a Protocol Using IMUs versus MoCap.在常规护理中评估脑卒中后瘫痪上肢运动的时空和质量变化:使用 IMU 与 MoCap 评估的方案建议和验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;23(17):7427. doi: 10.3390/s23177427.
脑卒中后抓握过程中的平滑度度量:第 2 部分。与运动障碍的纵向关联。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Sep 24;18(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00937-w.
4
How many trials are needed in kinematic analysis of reach-to-grasp?-A study of the drinking task in persons with stroke and non-disabled controls.抓握运动分析中需要进行多少次试验?—一项对脑卒中患者和非残疾对照者饮水任务的研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jun 15;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00895-3.
5
Emerging concepts on bradykinesia in non-parkinsonian conditions.非帕金森病患者运动徐缓的新兴概念。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jul;28(7):2403-2422. doi: 10.1111/ene.14851. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Reliability of upper limb movement quality metrics during everyday tasks.日常任务中上肢运动质量指标的可靠性。
Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Systematic Review on Kinematic Assessments of Upper Limb Movements After Stroke.系统评价脑卒中后上肢运动的运动学评估。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):718-727. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023531.
8
Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments.使用三维运动捕捉技术对有和无上肢损伤人群饮水任务的运动学分析
J Vis Exp. 2018 Mar 28(133):57228. doi: 10.3791/57228.
9
Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.脑卒中患者接受 3 个月的机器人辅助上肢训练后,上肢指向任务运动学的改善模式。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Oct 13;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0315-1.
10
Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) for the Treatment of Hemiparesis in Adults With Upper Limb Spasticity Previously Treated With Botulinum Toxin: Subanalysis From a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.阿巴司琼毒素 A(Dysport)治疗既往接受肉毒毒素治疗的成人上肢痉挛性偏瘫的疗效和安全性:来自一项 3 期随机对照试验的亚分析。
PM R. 2017 Dec;9(12):1181-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 16.