Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health (DASH Center), School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Tobacco use among gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals is disproportionately higher than among heterosexual individuals. Identifying the mechanisms behind these differences can inform prevention and cessation efforts aimed at advancing health equity. Internalizing and externalizing symptoms as mediators of tobacco (re)uptake among sexual minority individuals was examined.
Waves 4 and 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2016-2019) study were analyzed in 2022. Adolescents aged ≥14 and adults years not using tobacco at Wave 4 (n=21,676) were included. Wave 4 sexual identity was categorized as heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, or something else. Associations of sexual identity with (re)uptake of cigarette use, E-cigarette use, and polytobacco use at Wave 5 were assessed, along with possible mediation of these associations by Wave 4‒internalizing and ‒externalizing symptoms.
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms predicted tobacco (re)uptake regardless of sexual identity, particularly for female individuals. Gay/lesbian females (AOR=2.26; 95% CI=1.14, 4.48) and bisexual females (AOR=1.36; 95% CI=1.06, 1.74) had greater odds of E-cigarette (re)uptake than heterosexual females. High internalizing and externalizing symptoms accounted for over one third of the difference in E-cigarette (re)uptake among bisexual compared with that among heterosexual females. Males who reported sexual identity as something-else had lower odds of cigarette (re)uptake than heterosexual males (AOR=0.19; 95% CI=0.06, 0.66); this association was not mediated by internalizing and externalizing symptoms.
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms uniquely contribute to E-cigarette (re)uptake among bisexual females. Strategies that reduce sexual minority stressors and resulting psychological distress may help to reduce tobacco use disparities.
男同性恋、女同性恋和双性恋者的烟草使用比例明显高于异性恋者。确定这些差异背后的机制可以为旨在促进健康公平的预防和戒烟工作提供信息。本研究检验了性少数群体中内化和外化症状作为烟草(重新)摄入的中介。
2022 年分析了 2016-2019 年人群烟草评估(Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health,PATH)研究的第 4 波和第 5 波数据。纳入第 4 波时年龄≥14 岁且未使用烟草的成年人(n=21676)。第 4 波时的性身份被分为异性恋、男同性恋/女同性恋、双性恋或其他。评估性身份与第 5 波时香烟使用、电子烟使用和多烟草使用的(重新)摄入的关联,以及第 4 波时内化和外化症状对这些关联的可能中介作用。
无论性身份如何,内化和外化症状都预测了烟草(重新)摄入,特别是对女性个体。男同性恋/女同性恋女性(AOR=2.26;95%CI=1.14,4.48)和双性恋女性(AOR=1.36;95%CI=1.06,1.74)比异性恋女性更有可能重新使用电子烟。高内化和外化症状解释了双性恋女性与异性恋女性之间电子烟(重新)摄入差异的三分之一以上。报告性身份为其他的男性与异性恋男性相比,香烟(重新)摄入的可能性较低(AOR=0.19;95%CI=0.06,0.66);这种关联不受内化和外化症状的影响。
内化和外化症状独特地导致双性恋女性重新使用电子烟。减少性少数群体压力源和由此产生的心理困扰的策略可能有助于减少烟草使用的差异。