Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Hebei, China.
J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Mar;156:103819. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103819. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Previous studies of intrauterine infusion therapy in recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients have shown conflicting results, and there is a lack of head-to-head horizontal comparisons between different drugs. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of four intrauterine infusion drugs, including human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), in improving pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients through the network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of preimplantation intrauterine infusion for RIF were searched in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and CINAHL. Meanwhile, relevant data were extracted and Stata 15.0 software was applied to statistical analysis. A total of 21 studies with a sample size of 2917 cases were included in this study. Clinical pregnancy rate network meta-analysis showed that, intrauterine infusion of all four drugs is significantly better than the blank and placebo groups, while only PRP could significantly increase live birth rate compared with the blank and placebo groups. The SUCRA plots of clinical pregnancy and live birth rates showed a higher ranking of PRP and PBMCs. Early abortion intervention analysis found that only G-CSF is significantly better than the blank and placebo groups, and the SUCRA plot of G-CSF showed the highest ranking. All these findings confirmed that all four intrauterine infusion drugs can improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients to varying degrees, with PRP being the most effective. Further prospective, large-scale and high-quality RCTs are still necessary to determine the exact subgroups of benefit for the different drugs.
先前关于复发性植入失败(RIF)患者宫腔内输注治疗的研究结果存在争议,并且缺乏不同药物之间的头对头水平比较。本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估四种宫腔内输注药物,包括人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)、粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)和自体富血小板血浆(PRP),对 RIF 患者改善妊娠结局的有效性。在 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Medline 和 CINAHL 中搜索了关于植入前宫腔内输注治疗 RIF 的随机对照试验(RCT)。同时提取相关数据,并应用 Stata 15.0 软件进行统计分析。本研究共纳入 21 项研究,样本量为 2917 例。临床妊娠率网络荟萃分析显示,四种药物宫腔内输注均明显优于空白和安慰剂组,而只有 PRP 与空白和安慰剂组相比,能明显提高活产率。临床妊娠和活产率的 SUCRA 图显示 PRP 和 PBMCs 的排名较高。早期流产干预分析发现,只有 G-CSF 明显优于空白和安慰剂组,G-CSF 的 SUCRA 图显示排名最高。所有这些发现都证实,四种宫腔内输注药物均可在不同程度上改善 RIF 患者的妊娠结局,其中 PRP 最为有效。仍需要前瞻性、大规模和高质量的 RCT 来确定不同药物的确切获益亚组。