• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免费在线决策工具,帮助家长为其子女的慢性健康状况做出决策:环境扫描。

Free Online Decision Tools to Support Parents Making Decisions About Their Children's Chronic Health Condition: An Environmental Scan.

机构信息

Discipline of Genetic Counselling, University of Technology Sydney (T Wilkin, A Stott, A McEwen, and E Turbitt), Ultimo, NSW, Australia.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health (JL Lin), Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2023 Jul;23(5):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2023.02.002
PMID:36775123
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11047007/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical decisions parents make on their children's behalf can be challenging. Free online decision support tools are created to help parents faced with these decisions.

OBJECTIVE

We used an environmental scan to identify free, online tools that support parents in making decisions about their children's chronic health condition. We described the tools and assessed their potential to harm, content, development process, readability, and whether their use changed decision makers' knowledge and alignment of their preferences with their final decision.

DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY

Decision aid repositories, Google searches, and key informants identified decision support tools. Eligible tools were freely available online and for parents of children with chronic health conditions.

APPRAISAL METHODS

Two reviewers independently assessed the tools' quality based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Tool readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease test.

RESULTS

From 21 free, online decision support tools, 14 (67%) provided sufficient detail for making a specific decision (IPDAS qualifying criteria). None sufficiently met IPDAS certification criteria necessary to reduce the possibility of patient harms when using the tool. Three (14%) were fairly easy or easy to read. Of those evaluated by developers (n = 6), 2 improved knowledge and 4 improved alignment of preferences with the available options.

LIMITATIONS

Google searches and key informant sources are not replicable.

CONCLUSIONS

Free, online decision support tools for parents of children with chronic health conditions are of variable quality, most are difficult to read, and there is limited evidence their use achieves intended outcomes.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered with Open Science Framework 20 July 2021(AEST) osf.io/b94yj.

摘要

背景

父母为子女做出医疗决策可能颇具挑战性。免费的在线决策支持工具旨在帮助面临这些决策的父母。

目的

我们采用环境扫描法,识别出支持父母为子女的慢性健康状况做出决策的免费在线工具。我们描述了这些工具,并评估了它们对父母造成伤害的可能性、内容、开发过程、可读性,以及它们的使用是否改变了决策者的知识和偏好与最终决策的一致性。

数据来源和纳入标准

决策辅助工具库、谷歌搜索和关键知情人确定了决策支持工具。符合条件的工具是免费在线提供的,适用于患有慢性健康状况的儿童的父母。

评估方法

两名评审员根据国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)独立评估工具的质量。使用 Flesch 阅读舒适度测试评估工具的可读性。

结果

从 21 种免费的在线决策支持工具中,有 14 种(67%)提供了足够的细节以做出具体决策(符合 IPDAS 资格标准)。没有一种工具完全符合 IPDAS 认证标准,无法降低使用工具时患者受到伤害的可能性。有 3 种(14%)的工具容易或相当容易阅读。在对 6 种由开发者评估的工具中,有 2 种提高了知识水平,4 种提高了偏好与可用选项的一致性。

局限性

谷歌搜索和关键知情人来源不可复制。

结论

针对患有慢性健康状况的儿童的父母的免费在线决策支持工具质量参差不齐,大多数可读性较差,而且其使用是否达到预期效果的证据有限。

注册号

于 2021 年 7 月 20 日(AEST)在开放科学框架注册osf.io/b94yj。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b3/11047007/7a9bd7171161/nihms-1981563-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b3/11047007/7a9bd7171161/nihms-1981563-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b3/11047007/7a9bd7171161/nihms-1981563-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Free Online Decision Tools to Support Parents Making Decisions About Their Children's Chronic Health Condition: An Environmental Scan.免费在线决策工具,帮助家长为其子女的慢性健康状况做出决策:环境扫描。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Jul;23(5):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
2
A systematic review of online resources to support patient decision-making for full-thickness rectal prolapse surgery.全层直肠前突手术患者决策支持的在线资源系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1708-7. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.用于原发性心血管疾病预防的在线决策辅助工具:系统检索、质量评估及对健康素养低的患者的适用性
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025173.
4
Quality of patient decision aids to support the public making COVID-19 decisions: An online environmental scan.支持公众做出 COVID-19 决策的患者决策辅助工具质量:一项在线环境扫描。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107797. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107797. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
Decision aids that support decisions about prenatal testing for Down syndrome: an environmental scan.支持唐氏综合征产前检测决策的决策辅助工具:一项环境扫描。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Sep 24;15:76. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0199-6.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
8
Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.用于辅助局部晚期和复发性直肠癌患者决策的互联网信息质量
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e382-e391. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Serious Choices: A Protocol for an Environmental Scan of Patient Decision Aids for Seriously Ill People at Risk of Death Facing Choices about Life-Sustaining Treatments.严肃选择:一项针对面临生命维持治疗选择的病危濒死患者的决策辅助工具的环境扫描的协议。
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0268-2.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents.为家长开发的气管切开术决策支持视频及其可接受性测试
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 24;7:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100412. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0.国际患者决策辅助工具标准(IPDAS)协作组织:证据更新2.0
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):729-733. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211035681. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
Parental decision making about clinical trial enrollment: A survey of parents of children with Fragile X syndrome.家长对临床试验入组的决策:脆性 X 综合征患儿家长的调查。
Health Psychol. 2020 Dec;39(12):1070-1077. doi: 10.1037/hea0001038.
3
Online Health Information Seeking by Parents for Their Children: Systematic Review and Agenda for Further Research.
家长为子女在线搜索健康信息:系统评价及进一步研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e19985. doi: 10.2196/19985.
4
Parent Perspectives in Shared Decision-Making for Children With Medical Complexity.患有复杂疾病儿童共同决策中的家长观点
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Nov-Dec;20(8):1101-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
A scoping review and assessment of essential elements of shared decision-making of parent-involved interventions in child and adolescent mental health.一项关于儿童和青少年心理健康中家长参与干预的共同决策基本要素的范围审查和评估。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;30(9):1319-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01530-7. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study.针对考虑1型糖尿病胰岛素给药方式的青少年及其父母,使用患者决策辅助工具进行决策指导:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1898-4.
7
Parental Conflict, Regret, and Short-term Impact on Quality of Life in Tracheostomy Decision-Making.父母冲突、遗憾及其对气管切开术决策短期生活质量的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):136-142. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002109.
8
The evolution of regret: decision-making for parents of children with cancer.后悔的演变:癌症患儿父母的决策制定。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1215-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04933-8. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk.当我们为他人做决策时,我们的风险偏好会改变吗?涉及风险的自我-他人决策差异的元分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0216566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216566. eCollection 2019.
10
Availability and readability of patient education materials for deprescribing: An environmental scan.药物减量患者教育材料的可及性和可读性:环境扫描。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;85(7):1396-1406. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13912. Epub 2019 May 7.