• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较浅层和深层干针治疗上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点的即刻和延迟效果。

Comparison of immediate and delayed effects of superficial and deep dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.003
PMID:36775504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dry needling is one of the most common treatments for this condition. In this study the immediate and delayed effects of superficial dry needling (SDN) and deep dry needling (DDN) on upper trapezius muscle function and patients' pain and disability was evaluated.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, 47 women with active MTrPs were randomly divided into SDN and DDN groups and received one session treatment. Pain and disability were assessed before and one week after intervention with visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Muscle activity was assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) before, immediately and one week after intervention.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant decrease in VAS (p < 0.001) and NDI (p < 0.001) after one week, however no significant difference were found between the groups (p > 0.05). A significant increase in sEMG activity was observed only in DDN group after one week (p < 0.007), but there were no significant differences in sEMG activity in SDN group after intervention and between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both SDN and DDN could be effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with active MTrPs of upper trapezius muscle. Regarding muscle function DDN seems to be more effective. So that based on evaluation of the therapist in some cases with not significant muscle dysfunction SDN as a gentle and less invasive method could be used but for long term effectiveness and in those with significant muscle dysfunction DDN could be used.

摘要

背景

干针疗法是治疗这种疾病最常用的方法之一。在这项研究中,评估了浅层干针疗法(SDN)和深层干针疗法(DDN)对上斜方肌功能以及患者疼痛和残疾的即时和延迟影响。

方法

在这项准实验研究中,47 名患有活动性肌筋膜触发点的女性被随机分为 SDN 和 DDN 组,并接受一次治疗。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷在干预前和干预后一周评估疼痛和残疾。在干预前、干预即刻和干预后一周评估肌肉活动,采用表面肌电图(sEMG)。

结果

两组在干预后一周均显示 VAS(p<0.001)和 NDI(p<0.001)显著降低,但两组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。仅在 DDN 组在干预后一周观察到 sEMG 活性显著增加(p<0.007),但 SDN 组在干预后和两组之间 sEMG 活性无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

SDN 和 DDN 均可有效减轻上斜方肌活动性肌筋膜触发点患者的疼痛和残疾。就肌肉功能而言,DDN 似乎更有效。因此,根据治疗师的评估,在某些肌肉功能没有明显障碍的情况下,SDN 可以作为一种温和、侵入性较小的方法使用,但对于长期效果和那些有明显肌肉功能障碍的患者,DDN 可以使用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of immediate and delayed effects of superficial and deep dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.比较浅层和深层干针治疗上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点的即刻和延迟效果。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
2
Dry needling in active or latent trigger point in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.干针治疗颈部疼痛患者活动或潜伏触发点:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 24;12(1):3188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07063-0.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness between dry needling with and without needle retention in myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle: A randomized comparative trial.比较在斜方肌肌筋膜触发点中进行干针治疗与留针治疗的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(6):1247-1255. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210177.
4
Postneedling Soreness and Tenderness After Different Dosages of Dry Needling of an Active Myofascial Trigger Point in Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.颈部疼痛患者不同剂量干针疗法针刺活跃肌筋膜触发点后的针后酸痛和压痛:一项随机对照试验
PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1311-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Randomized Trial on Comparison of the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points.随机对照试验比较体外冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗肌筋膜触发点的疗效。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):677-684. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001173.
6
Efficacy of dry needling in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders related to the masseter muscle.干针疗法对与咬肌相关的肌筋膜性颞下颌关节紊乱症患者的疗效。
Cranio. 2020 Sep;38(5):305-311. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2018.1526848. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Comparison of pressure release, phonophoresis and dry needling in treatment of latent myofascial trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.压力释放、离子导入疗法与干针疗法治疗上斜方肌潜在肌筋膜触发点的比较
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(4):587-594. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181302.
8
Day of peak pain reduction by a single session of dry needling in the upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: A 14 daily follow-up study.单次干针治疗上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点对疼痛缓解的峰值时间:14 天每日随访研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
The effects of shock wave and dry needling on active trigger points of upper trapezius muscle in patients with non-specific neck pain: A randomized clinical trial.冲击波和干针疗法对非特异性颈部疼痛患者上斜方肌活性触发点的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):811-818. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181289.
10
Electromyographic Assessment of the Efficacy of Deep Dry Needling versus the Ischemic Compression Technique in Gastrocnemius of Medium-Distance Triathletes.对中长跑运动员腓肠肌深部干针与缺血性压迫技术疗效的肌电图评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;21(9):2906. doi: 10.3390/s21092906.

引用本文的文献

1
Dry needling as an adjunct treatment to multimodal rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair surgery: a preliminary, randomized sham-controlled trial.肩袖修复术后干针疗法作为多模式康复方案的辅助治疗:一项初步的随机假对照试验。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Dec 5;32(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00555-y.
2
Research Trends in Dry Needling for Neck Pain Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis.用于颈部疼痛治疗的干针疗法研究趋势:一项文献计量分析
J Chiropr Humanit. 2024 Oct 1;31:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2024.02.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.