Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Dry needling is one of the most common treatments for this condition. In this study the immediate and delayed effects of superficial dry needling (SDN) and deep dry needling (DDN) on upper trapezius muscle function and patients' pain and disability was evaluated.
In this quasi-experimental study, 47 women with active MTrPs were randomly divided into SDN and DDN groups and received one session treatment. Pain and disability were assessed before and one week after intervention with visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Muscle activity was assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) before, immediately and one week after intervention.
Both groups showed significant decrease in VAS (p < 0.001) and NDI (p < 0.001) after one week, however no significant difference were found between the groups (p > 0.05). A significant increase in sEMG activity was observed only in DDN group after one week (p < 0.007), but there were no significant differences in sEMG activity in SDN group after intervention and between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Both SDN and DDN could be effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with active MTrPs of upper trapezius muscle. Regarding muscle function DDN seems to be more effective. So that based on evaluation of the therapist in some cases with not significant muscle dysfunction SDN as a gentle and less invasive method could be used but for long term effectiveness and in those with significant muscle dysfunction DDN could be used.
干针疗法是治疗这种疾病最常用的方法之一。在这项研究中,评估了浅层干针疗法(SDN)和深层干针疗法(DDN)对上斜方肌功能以及患者疼痛和残疾的即时和延迟影响。
在这项准实验研究中,47 名患有活动性肌筋膜触发点的女性被随机分为 SDN 和 DDN 组,并接受一次治疗。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷在干预前和干预后一周评估疼痛和残疾。在干预前、干预即刻和干预后一周评估肌肉活动,采用表面肌电图(sEMG)。
两组在干预后一周均显示 VAS(p<0.001)和 NDI(p<0.001)显著降低,但两组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。仅在 DDN 组在干预后一周观察到 sEMG 活性显著增加(p<0.007),但 SDN 组在干预后和两组之间 sEMG 活性无显著差异(p>0.05)。
SDN 和 DDN 均可有效减轻上斜方肌活动性肌筋膜触发点患者的疼痛和残疾。就肌肉功能而言,DDN 似乎更有效。因此,根据治疗师的评估,在某些肌肉功能没有明显障碍的情况下,SDN 可以作为一种温和、侵入性较小的方法使用,但对于长期效果和那些有明显肌肉功能障碍的患者,DDN 可以使用。