Pueringer John, Brennan Matthew, Weinsheim Travis, Sataloff Robert T
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Northeast Atlanta ENT, Suwanee, Georgia, USA.
J Voice. 2025 Jul;39(4):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Unilateral vocal fold paresis or paralysis (UVFP) is a condition for which radiographic evaluation and laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) are valuable to evaluate severity of injury and direct treatment plans. Despite extensive research involving findings suggestive of UVFP with radiographic imaging, no study has attempted to determine which findings suggestive of UVFP on imaging are clinically significant and suggest a need for intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the severity of vocal fold paresis/paralysis affects the likelihood of encountering radiographic findings suggestive of UVFP. We also aimed to determine which findings suggestive of UVFP on imaging were clinically significant and were associated with surgical intervention.
A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who had been diagnosed with unilateral vocal fold paresis or paralysis and had been evaluated by CT scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging and laryngeal electromyography (EMG) between the dates of January 1, 2017 and January 9, 2018. Fisher's exact testing with Monte Carlo Simulation was utilized to determine statistical significance of identified relationships. Univariate analysis was conducted to assess for individual relationships between imaging results and the potential predictor variables. Chi square analysis was conducted with the various categorical variables to assess for any potential relationships to imaging results. Statistical significance was determined utilizing chi square analysis.
After data collection, 130 patients were included in the study population. Of the 112 patients with documented MRI results, 17% had a reported imaging abnormality suggestive of true vocal fold paresis or paralysis (VFP). Of the 71 patients with documented CT Neck results, 15.4% had an abnormality potentially concerning for true VFP. The average decrease in recruitment of the right and left SLN was 23.8% and 26.1%, respectively. The average decrease in recruitment of the right and left RLN was 37.3% and 57.78%, respectively. Seventy four percent of patients who exhibited abnormal MRI were found to have isolated SLN weakness, and 21% of patients were found to have a combined SLN and ipsilateral RLN weakness. In patients with abnormal CT scans 45% were found to have isolated SLN weakness, and 35% were found to have a combined SLN and RLN weakness. MRI imaging again failed to display any significant degree of paresis. However, abnormal CT results displayed severe CN X paresis in 36.84% vs 1.96% in normal scans. The chance of an abnormal MRI and CT result was 2.78 and 5.55 times greater, respectively, for each increase in the degree of severity of CN X paresis. When looking at the ability of imaging to predict the chance of a patient undergoing surgery, 34.8% of patients with an abnormal MRI underwent surgery compared to just 14.61% of those with normal scans. For CT scans, 35% of patients with an abnormal scan underwent surgery, compared with only 15.69% with normal imaging. When pooled, over 33% of patients with any abnormal imaging underwent a laryngeal procedure compared to 13% of patients with normal imaging.
There is a relationship between severity of vocal fold paresis found on laryngeal EMG and likelihood of detection on imaging. While CT was more likely to find characteristics of UVFP than MRI, patients who had an abnormal finding on either modality were more likely to undergo surgical intervention. These findings highlight the importance of early referral of patients with abnormal laryngeal imaging to an otolaryngologist for evaluation and possible intervention.
单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)是一种通过影像学评估和喉肌电图(LEMG)来评估损伤严重程度并指导治疗方案的疾病。尽管已有大量研究通过影像学检查提示UVFP,但尚无研究试图确定影像学上提示UVFP的哪些表现具有临床意义并提示需要干预。本研究的目的是评估声带麻痹/瘫痪的严重程度是否会影响出现提示UVFP的影像学表现的可能性。我们还旨在确定影像学上提示UVFP的哪些表现具有临床意义并与手术干预相关。
对2017年1月1日至2018年1月9日期间被诊断为单侧声带麻痹且接受过CT扫描和/或磁共振成像及喉肌电图(EMG)检查的患者进行回顾性病历审查。采用费舍尔精确检验和蒙特卡罗模拟来确定所确定关系的统计学意义。进行单因素分析以评估影像学结果与潜在预测变量之间的个体关系。对各种分类变量进行卡方分析以评估与影像学结果的任何潜在关系。采用卡方分析确定统计学意义。
数据收集后,130名患者纳入研究人群。在有MRI结果记录的112名患者中,17%报告有提示真性声带麻痹或瘫痪(VFP)的影像学异常。在有CT颈部结果记录的71名患者中,15.4%有潜在的真性VFP异常。右侧和左侧喉上神经(SLN)募集的平均减少分别为23.8%和26.1%。右侧和左侧喉返神经(RLN)募集的平均减少分别为37.3%和57.78%。74% MRI表现异常的患者被发现有孤立的SLN无力,21%的患者被发现有SLN和同侧RLN联合无力。在CT扫描异常的患者中,45%被发现有孤立的SLN无力,35%被发现有SLN和RLN联合无力。MRI成像再次未能显示任何明显程度的麻痹。然而,异常CT结果显示严重的迷走神经(CN X)麻痹在异常扫描中占36.84%,而正常扫描中为1.96%。随着CN X麻痹严重程度每增加一级,MRI和CT结果异常的可能性分别增加2.78倍和5.55倍。在观察影像学预测患者接受手术可能性的能力时,MRI异常的患者中有34.8%接受了手术,而扫描正常的患者中只有14.61%接受了手术。对于CT扫描,扫描异常的患者中有35%接受了手术,而影像学正常的患者中只有15.69%接受了手术。汇总后,任何影像学异常的患者中有超过33%接受了喉部手术,而影像学正常的患者中这一比例为13%。
喉肌电图发现的声带麻痹严重程度与影像学检测的可能性之间存在关联。虽然CT比MRI更有可能发现UVFP的特征,但两种检查方式中任何一种有异常发现的患者更有可能接受手术干预。这些发现突出了将喉部影像学异常的患者早期转诊给耳鼻喉科医生进行评估和可能干预的重要性。