Zhu Yejing, Wang Enxin, Zhao Shoujie, Han Dandan, Zhao Yan, Chen Hui, Zhu Jun, Han Tenghui, Bai Yang, Lou Yanju, Zhang Yongchao, Yang Man, Zuo Luo, Fan Jiahao, Chen Xing, Jia Jia, Wu Wenbin, Ren Weirong, Bai Tingting, Ma Shouzheng, Xu Fenghua, Tang Yuxin, Han Ying, Zhao Junlong, Qi Xingshun, Li Jing, Du Xilin, Chen Dongfeng, Liu Lei
Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Fourth Military Medical University), Xi'an, China.
Department of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;12:983554. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.983554. eCollection 2022.
Hepatoma arterial-embolization prognostic (HAP) series scores have been proposed for prognostic prediction in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, their prognostic value in TACE plus sorafenib (TACE-S) remains unknown. Here, we aim to evaluate their prognostic performance in such conditions and identify the best model for this combination therapy.
Between January 2012 and December 2018, consecutive patients with uHCC receiving TACE-S were recruited from 15 tertiary hospitals in China. Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the prognostic values of baseline factors and every scoring system. Their prognostic performance and discriminatory performance were evaluated and confirmed in subgroup analyses.
A total of 404 patients were enrolled. In the whole cohort, the median follow-up period was 44.2 (interquartile range (IQR), 33.2-60.7) months, the median overall survival (OS) time was 13.2 months, and 336 (83.2%) patients died at the end of the follow-up period. According to multivariate analyses, HAP series scores were independent prognostic indicators of OS. In addition, the C-index, Akaike information criterion (AIC) values, and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) indicated that modified HAP (mHAP)-III had the best predictive performance. Furthermore, the results remained consistent in most subsets of patients.
HAP series scores exhibited good predictive ability in uHCC patients accepting TACE-S, and the mHAP-III score was found to be superior to the other HAP series scores in predicting OS. Future prospective high-quality studies should be conducted to confirm our results and help with treatment decision-making.
肝癌动脉栓塞预后(HAP)系列评分已被提出用于接受经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)患者的预后预测。然而,它们在TACE联合索拉非尼(TACE-S)治疗中的预后价值尚不清楚。在此,我们旨在评估它们在此种情况下的预后性能,并确定这种联合治疗的最佳模型。
2012年1月至2018年12月期间,在中国15家三级医院招募了连续接受TACE-S治疗的uHCC患者。采用Cox回归分析来研究基线因素和每个评分系统的预后价值。在亚组分析中评估并确认了它们的预后性能和鉴别性能。
共纳入404例患者。在整个队列中,中位随访期为44.2(四分位间距(IQR),33.2 - 60.7)个月,中位总生存期(OS)为13.2个月,336例(83.2%)患者在随访期末死亡。根据多变量分析,HAP系列评分是OS的独立预后指标。此外,C指数、赤池信息准则(AIC)值和时间依赖性受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)表明改良HAP(mHAP)-III具有最佳预测性能。此外,在大多数患者亚组中结果保持一致。
HAP系列评分在接受TACE-S治疗的uHCC患者中表现出良好的预测能力,并且发现mHAP-III评分在预测OS方面优于其他HAP系列评分。未来应进行前瞻性高质量研究以证实我们的结果并有助于治疗决策。