Suppr超能文献

赋值-对照图:因果推断研究设计的可视化辅助工具

Assignment-Control Plots: A Visual Companion for Causal Inference Study Design.

作者信息

Aikens Rachael C, Baiocchi Michael

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University.

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University.

出版信息

Am Stat. 2023;77(1):72-84. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2051605. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

Abstract

An important step for any causal inference study design is understanding the distribution of the subjects in terms of measured baseline covariates. However, not all baseline variation is equally important. We propose a set of visualizations that reduce the space of measured covariates into two components of baseline variation important to the design of an observational causal inference study: a propensity score summarizing baseline variation associated with treatment assignment, and prognostic score summarizing baseline variation associated with the untreated potential outcome. These and variations thereof visualize study design trade-offs and illustrate core methodological concepts in causal inference. As a practical demonstration, we apply assignment-control plots to a hypothetical study of cardiothoracic surgery. To demonstrate how these plots can be used to illustrate nuanced concepts, we use them to visualize unmeasured confounding and to consider the relationship between propensity scores and instrumental variables. While the family of visualization tools for studies of causality is relatively sparse, simple visual tools can be an asset to education, application, and methods development.

摘要

对于任何因果推断研究设计而言,重要的一步是根据测量的基线协变量了解研究对象的分布情况。然而,并非所有基线变异都同等重要。我们提出了一组可视化方法,将测量的协变量空间缩减为对观察性因果推断研究设计重要的两个基线变异成分:一个倾向得分,总结与治疗分配相关的基线变异;一个预后得分,总结与未治疗潜在结果相关的基线变异。这些及其变体可视化了研究设计的权衡,并阐明了因果推断中的核心方法概念。作为一个实际演示,我们将分配-对照图应用于一个心胸外科的假设研究。为了展示这些图如何用于阐明细微的概念,我们用它们来可视化未测量的混杂因素,并考虑倾向得分与工具变量之间的关系。虽然用于因果关系研究的可视化工具种类相对较少,但简单的可视化工具对教育、应用和方法开发可能是一项资产。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ed/9916271/72ca2562d2ae/nihms-1798421-f0001.jpg

相似文献

10
Bayesian causal inference: a critical review.贝叶斯因果推断:批判性回顾。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 May 15;381(2247):20220153. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0153. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

5
Sex and mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft.冠状动脉搭桥术相关的性别与死亡率
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(Suppl 18):S2157-S2159. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.149.
9
Near/far matching: a study design approach to instrumental variables.近/远匹配:一种工具变量的研究设计方法。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2012 Dec;12(4):237-253. doi: 10.1007/s10742-012-0091-0. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验