• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察性研究的试点设计:巧妙运用丰富数据。

A pilot design for observational studies: Using abundant data thoughtfully.

作者信息

Aikens Rachael C, Greaves Dylan, Baiocchi Michael

机构信息

Program in Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2020 Dec 30;39(30):4821-4840. doi: 10.1002/sim.8754. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8754
PMID:33015867
Abstract

Observational studies often benefit from an abundance of observational units. This can lead to studies that-while challenged by issues of internal validity-have inferences derived from sample sizes substantially larger than randomized controlled trials. But is the information provided by an observational unit best used in the analysis phase? We propose the use of a "pilot design," in which observations are expended in the design phase of the study, and the posttreatment information from these observations is used to improve study design. In modern observational studies, which are data rich but control poor, pilot designs can be used to gain information about the structure of posttreatment variation. This information can then be used to improve instrumental variable designs, propensity score matching, doubly robust estimation, and other observational study designs. We illustrate one version of a pilot design, which aims to reduce within-set heterogeneity and improve performance in sensitivity analyses. This version of a pilot design expends observational units during the design phase to fit a prognostic model, avoiding concerns of overfitting. In addition, it enables the construction of "assignment-control plots," which visualize the relationship between propensity and prognostic scores. We first show some examples of these plots, then we demonstrate in a simulation setting how this alternative use of the observations can lead to gains in terms of both treatment effect estimation and sensitivity analyses of unobserved confounding.

摘要

观察性研究通常受益于大量的观察单位。这可能导致一些研究,尽管受到内部有效性问题的挑战,但从样本量得出的推论比随机对照试验大得多。但是,观察单位提供的信息在分析阶段得到最佳利用了吗?我们建议使用“试点设计”,即在研究的设计阶段投入观察,然后利用这些观察的治疗后信息来改进研究设计。在现代观察性研究中,数据丰富但对照不足,试点设计可用于获取有关治疗后变异结构的信息。然后,这些信息可用于改进工具变量设计、倾向得分匹配、双重稳健估计和其他观察性研究设计。我们展示了一种试点设计版本,其目的是减少组内异质性并提高敏感性分析的性能。这种试点设计版本在设计阶段投入观察单位以拟合预后模型,避免了过度拟合的担忧。此外,它能够构建“分配 - 对照图”,直观显示倾向得分和预后得分之间的关系。我们首先展示这些图的一些示例,然后在模拟环境中证明这种对观察的另类使用如何在治疗效果估计和未观察到的混杂因素的敏感性分析方面带来收益。

相似文献

1
A pilot design for observational studies: Using abundant data thoughtfully.观察性研究的试点设计:巧妙运用丰富数据。
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 30;39(30):4821-4840. doi: 10.1002/sim.8754. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Assignment-Control Plots: A Visual Companion for Causal Inference Study Design.赋值-对照图:因果推断研究设计的可视化辅助工具
Am Stat. 2023;77(1):72-84. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2051605. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.关于倾向得分和预后得分在估计对治疗对象的平均治疗效果中的联合应用:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 10;33(20):3488-508. doi: 10.1002/sim.6030. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.用于高维混杂因素调整的双稳健匹配估计量。
Biometrics. 2018 Dec;74(4):1171-1179. doi: 10.1111/biom.12887. Epub 2018 May 11.
5
Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.使用大型观测数据集评估因果治疗效果估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0858-x.
6
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
[Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].[用于在观察性研究中实现协变量平衡的倾向评分方法]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
8
stratamatch: Prognostic Score Stratification Using a Pilot Design.分层匹配:使用试点设计的预后评分分层
R J. 2021 Jun;13(1):614-630. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2021-063.
9
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
The search for causal inferences: using propensity scores post hoc to reduce estimation error with nonexperimental research.因果推断的探索:事后使用倾向得分以减少非实验性研究中的估计误差。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Mar;39(2):246-57. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst143. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing evaluation metrics to measure the US national institute of health plans to enhance diverse perspectives: a protocol for a consensus-based study.制定评估指标以衡量美国国立卫生研究院增强多元观点的计划:一项基于共识的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e087739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087739.
2
Prioritizing Variables for Observational Study Design using the Joint Variable Importance Plot.使用联合变量重要性图对观察性研究设计中的变量进行优先级排序。
Am Stat. 2024;78(3):318-326. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2303419. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Quantitative bias analysis in practice: review of software for regression with unmeasured confounding.
实际中的定量偏倚分析:对存在未测量混杂的回归分析软件的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 4;23(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01906-8.
4
Addressing food insecurity and chronic conditions in community health centres: protocol of a quasi-experimental evaluation of Recipe4Health.解决社区健康中心的粮食不安全和慢性疾病问题:Recipe4Health 的准实验评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e068585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068585.
5
Assignment-Control Plots: A Visual Companion for Causal Inference Study Design.赋值-对照图:因果推断研究设计的可视化辅助工具
Am Stat. 2023;77(1):72-84. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2051605. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Practical recommendations on double score matching for estimating causal effects.关于双评分匹配法估计因果效应的实用建议。
Stat Med. 2022 Apr 15;41(8):1421-1445. doi: 10.1002/sim.9289. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
7
Four Cycles of Etoposide plus Cisplatin for Patients with Good-Risk Advanced Germ Cell Tumors.四周期依托泊苷联合顺铂治疗低危晚期生殖细胞肿瘤
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):483-491. doi: 10.1002/onco.13719. Epub 2021 Mar 12.